On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 12:00, Ed Trager wrote:
= The dinosaur could also perhaps be put in color -- not sure what
color would be appropriate?
When I was in high school I had a job at the local museum painting their
(life-sized) dinosaur models. The Brontosaurus was Chinese Green.
But, being
Full acronyms as text next to the icon is good, but again, I think you're
putting too much weight on what is surely a very minor part of the page.
With tooltips I wouldn't expect anyone to confuse the MIT license with the
M+ license which we don't support and I have never heard of :)
On 31 Jul
So do we have consensus on these icons with the full acronym as text next to
it?
Only query I have remaining is if we keep all 3 as black or have different
colors?
On 31 Jul 2009, 10:26 AM, Nicolas Spalinger nicolas_spalin...@sil.org
wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote: Full acronyms as text next to
Hi
Dave Crossland wrote:
So do we have consensus on these icons with the full acronym as text
next to it?
I support the idea.
Only query I have remaining is if we keep all 3 as black or have
different colors?
Yes, what happened to the colour idea? Was it seen as unnecessary? Ed's
Nothing else on the site uses colors to distinguish things. It would
make these elements stand out dramatically.
I don't see why tooltips or a mouseover div wouldn't solve this issue
without bulking up the icon.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
So do we have
:hover gives a lot more visual control than tooltips, which invariably
come in golf pants yellow. Given that we can use @font-face pretty
freely, given the audience for the site, this seems like an opportunity.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 12:02 PM, James Weiner wrote:
I agree with Joshua on
Hi, all,
For what it is worth, here's my 2 cents opinion:
= I like having the full acronym as text next to the logo. In this
I believe I concur with Dave and Ben.
= Because I liked the MIT logo with the dinosaur, I made up some
quick-and-dirty samples for OFL and GPL that would match the MIT
Joshua A.C. Newman wrote:
Nothing else on the site uses colors to distinguish things. It would
make these elements stand out dramatically.
I don't see why tooltips or a mouseover div wouldn't solve this issue
without bulking up the icon.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Dave Crossland
Yes, I was thinking about that, too. I don't know if it will work with
these varied licenses.
You can search by rights, even.
-J
On Jul 31, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
CC does a great job with their icons and descriptions.
Joshua Newman Design
401.225.7222
Ben Weiner wrote:
Hello all,
I've been working on the new OFLB listing page and I've got a favour
to ask of you.
We have a logo for the Open Font License. See the 'listing'
screen-grab attached. But there are no logos for the other licenses
(MIT, OFL and GPLv3+font-exception). It would be
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Apart from that only a MIT and a GPL version are required - right?
I can work on those icons this evening.
Those 3 licenses are our 'recommended' or 'core' ones, and I think
that if we host other licensed fonts (again, I forget where we are on
that) they
FYI, there's an existing logo for GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/graphics/license-logos.html
Olivier
Dave Crossland a écrit :
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Apart from that only a MIT and a GPL version are required - right?
I can work on those icons this evening.
Those 3 licenses
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Apart from that only a MIT and a GPL version are required - right?
I can work on those icons this evening.
Those 3 licenses are our 'recommended' or 'core' ones, and I think
that if we host other licensed fonts (again, I forget
2009/7/30 Nicolas Spalinger nicolas_spalin...@sil.org:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Apart from that only a MIT and a GPL version are required - right?
I can work on those icons this evening.
Those 3 licenses are our 'recommended' or 'core' ones, and I think
,,, and such an attractive logo it is!
Who needs a graphic designer?
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Olivier BERTEN wrote:
FYI, there's an existing logo for GPL:
http://www.gnu.org/graphics/license-logos.html
Olivier
Dave Crossland a écrit :
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Hi,
that would be my approach for a temporary solution that fits the size
and purpose.
I'm not really happy with that much text inside a tiny image.
There should be a more complete and flexible approach to present meta
information.
What do you think?
Robert
inline: licences.png
These are nice. Maybe the MIT can be ligated/monogrammed to loosen it
up on the edges?
And what about making the characters oblique to match the covers?
-J
On Jul 30, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
I'm not really
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
As long as we provide descriptive mouse-over explanation with the complete
names (and maybe a link to a page that explains them in detail and with
official logos etc..).
Yes, I'll add this to the TODO so its not lost.
The 'o' and 'g' are aligned to the
2009/7/30 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
Okay, if you keep the orientation and use an oblique then that's good.
like that?
That's what I originally had in mind, yes, spot on.
Maybe make the text a little thicker and then transform it, as its a
little too light I think, especially compared to
(A few hours ago, seeing the first drafts but having to leave my
computer, I've exactly that to do in mind for this night. Back, you've
done it!) — Thanks Robert and thanks Dave!
Pierre
On 31-juil.-09, at 00:05, Robert Martinez wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
I think license should be cut
20 matches
Mail list logo
