> There are a number of tickets open related to text rendering:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314215
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8145496
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8129014
>
> They have in common that wrapped text is taking the trailing spaces on each
>
> There are a number of tickets open related to text rendering:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314215
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8145496
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8129014
>
> They have in common that wrapped text is taking the trailing spaces on each
>
> There are a number of tickets open related to text rendering:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314215
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8145496
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8129014
>
> They have in common that wrapped text is taking the trailing spaces on each
>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 20:43:33 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> I submitted PR
thank you!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1351#issuecomment-1917861792
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:33:06 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>>> > [JDK-8320912](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320912). I put
>>> > together a fix for that bug but decided not to roll it into this PR.
>>>
>>> Are these two bugs independent? Should JDK-8320912 be resolved first?
>>
>> They
This is a Mac only bug. If the user was in the middle of IM text composition
and clicked on a different node the partially composed text was left in the old
node and the IM window wasn't dismissed. This PR implements the existing
finishInputMethodComposition call so it can commit the text and
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:21:50 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [af7e0571](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/af7e05716711d942df20eb1f807b384810a4a839)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:21:50 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [af7e0571](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/af7e05716711d942df20eb1f807b384810a4a839)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commit being
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[af7e0571](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/af7e05716711d942df20eb1f807b384810a4a839)
from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Michael Strauß on 30 Jan 2024 and
was reviewed
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:53:51 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> `WinApplication` contains mappings of platform-specific preference keys to
> platform-independent keys.
> These keys are incorrect (for example, `Windows.UIColor.ForegroundColor`
> instead of `Windows.UIColor.Foreground`).
>
> This was
Hi John,
the rule that values set from code are less specific than values set
in author and inline styles is probably lifted from the CSS
specification, which says [0]:
"The UA may choose to honor presentational attributes in an HTML
source document. If so, these attributes are translated to the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:53:51 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> `WinApplication` contains mappings of platform-specific preference keys to
> platform-independent keys.
> These keys are incorrect (for example, `Windows.UIColor.ForegroundColor`
> instead of `Windows.UIColor.Foreground`).
>
> This was
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:53:51 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> `WinApplication` contains mappings of platform-specific preference keys to
> platform-independent keys.
> These keys are incorrect (for example, `Windows.UIColor.ForegroundColor`
> instead of `Windows.UIColor.Foreground`).
>
> This was
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:57:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to jfx22u (for 22.0.1).
@johanvos This clean backport needs Maintainer approval in JBS (but not a
Review in the PR). You can either use the "/approve" command or do it directly
in JBS.
-
PR Comment:
Hi Armin,
If I go to https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/ and filter to linux
aarch64, I see both SDK and JMODS for JavaFX 22-ea+16 (latest version,
which is early access). If you're talking about commercial support, I don't
know. Different companies choose what they support.
- Nir
On Tue, Jan
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:21:37 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> The order in which they get resolved doesn't matter.
would it be possible to get
[JDK-8320912](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320912) integrated first
then? It seems the scenario it addresses is narrower, and it will be easier
to
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:56:04 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
> > [JDK-8320912](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320912). I put together
> > a fix for that bug but decided not to roll it into this PR.
>
> Are these two bugs independent? Should JDK-8320912 be resolved first?
They are
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 23:59:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> As noted in the JBS bug, this is a follow-on to
> [JDK-8196011](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8196011) that I discovered
> while testing the fix for
> [JDK-8221261](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8221261) (a deadlock in the
Clean backport to jfx22u (for 22.0.1).
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 40809a3f84d5f9f91b265f455a95d045e5b4f692
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx22u/pull/8/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx22u=8=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322703
Stats: 62
IMO the current CSS priorities are wrong. A value set from code should be
adjacent to an in-line style in terms of precedence. They are both ways of
saying saying “this particular instance should have this value”
Scott
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 8:31 AM, John Hendrikx wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
Yeah, this is a better place for discussion than JBS.
JavaFX has long lacked a real headless test platform, so it will be cool
to see where this goes.
- Is there a JEP/tutorial for the new mode?
It's probably premature, given the early prototype nature...
-- Kevin
On 1/30/2024 8:14 AM,
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:57:22 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> As noted in the JBS bug, this is a follow-on to
>> [JDK-8196011](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8196011) that I discovered
>> while testing the fix for
>> [JDK-8221261](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8221261) (a deadlock in
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:19:48 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> In the Mac glass code the presence of "marked" text (which is tracked in the
>> nsAttrBuffer) signals that an IME is active. In this state the current code
>> assumes that when NSTextInputContext handles a `keyDown:` it will either
>>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:04:10 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote:
>> Martin Fox has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> When IM enabled state changes we dismiss the IM window.
>
> ... and scenarios described in JDK-8088172 and JDK-8089803
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:10:56 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> do you want to be the second reviewer?
will do
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1353#issuecomment-1917335686
Excellent development, Johan, thank you!
I’ve asked a few questions in the ticket
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324941
I suppose I should also do it here:
- How do you get information on a (virtual) screen?
- How would one control how many virtual screens are there?
- Would there be any
This is very cool Johan. I have some questions if you have time to answer:
Do you believe your headless platform POC would allow the use of the
snapshot method for exporting visuals of a scene to a png?
If so do you have any early indications of performance therein? (number of
snapshots per
Hey,
in the past there were releases for the platform linux aarch64. But I
can't find those anymore, neither in maven central, nor on the Gluon
javafx page, which provides prebuild jmods/SDKs. Is this platform not
supported anymore?
Best regards,
Armin Schrenk
--
Armin Schrenk
Skymatic
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:27:32 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
>> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed copyright years of modified files + fixed comments in
>> DMarlinPrismUtils
>
> Tests in
Hi Michael,
I think we first need to decide what the correct behavior is for CSS
properties, as the "bind" solution IMHO is a bug.
The StyleOrigin enum encodes the relative priorities of styles and user
set values, but it is incomplete and not fully enforced. There is
(currently) actually
>
> I'm under the impression that the last available 22+ea maven release,
> which is now almost 3 months old, does not contain the platform preferences
> API
>
You are correct, the new API was added a month after the latest ea build.
Versions 11-21 all had at least 1 ea release per month on
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:08:41 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [c5ab220b](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/c5ab220bbc885f2aa99d8c1d5ed8f1753e39251f)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commit
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:27:32 GMT, Karthik P K wrote:
>> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed copyright years of modified files + fixed comments in
>> DMarlinPrismUtils
>
> Tests in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:08:41 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [c5ab220b](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/c5ab220bbc885f2aa99d8c1d5ed8f1753e39251f)
> from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
>
> The commit
Hello Nir,
I'm not entirely familiar with every ea build, but I'm under the
impression that the last available 22+ea maven release, which is now
almost 3 months old, does not contain the platform preferences API and
also does not contain the kinda important css performance regression fixes.
Hi Christopher,
Looking at Maven Central,
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.openjfx/javafx, JavaFX releases ea
builds there, which I sometimes use myself from Maven/Gradle. Version 21
had 6 ea versions, and 22 has 3. The release cycle is 6 months per final
version (aligned with OpenJDK).
-
Alright I will try out the new ea release once the fix is integrated.
Other than that, everything works fine for me so far with observing
colors using the platform-specific strings.
As a side note, I think the community would have caught this issue
earlier if there were more frequent maven
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[c5ab220b](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/c5ab220bbc885f2aa99d8c1d5ed8f1753e39251f)
from the [openjdk/jfx](https://git.openjdk.org/jfx) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Nir Lisker on 30 Jan 2024 and was
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:56:35 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> Clean Backport
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a247278f
Author:Hima Bindu Meda
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx22u/commit/a247278f9818265e1d012981ea7a6fcc2748185a
Stats: 1297 lines in 161 files
Clean Backport
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 52840a17dee6a92fb9b1f3ff1b314b0ae228b95f
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx22u/pull/7/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx22u=7=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324337
Stats: 1297 lines in 161 files
Hi,
I created a branch in the jfx-sandbox repository for experimenting with a
headless glass platform:
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx-sandbox/tree/johanvos-headless
This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324941 where I suggest
a POC for a Headless platform.
There are a number of
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:29:31 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> Fixed scale=0 in DMarlinPrismUtils + added new test Scale0Test.java
>
> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fixed copyright years of modified files +
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:59:50 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Added a utility method to run code on the FX thread if it's not already, and
> changed the animation methods to use it.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c5ab220b
Author:Nir Lisker
URL:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:29:31 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> Fixed scale=0 in DMarlinPrismUtils + added new test Scale0Test.java
>
> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fixed copyright years of modified files +
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:29:31 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> Fixed scale=0 in DMarlinPrismUtils + added new test Scale0Test.java
>
> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fixed copyright years of modified files +
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:24:52 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Added a utility method to run code on the FX thread if it's not already, and
>> changed the animation methods to use it.
>
> Nir Lisker has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
>
Hi everyone,
I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on the following proposal,
which could increase the expressiveness of the JavaFX Property API:
Problem
---
The JavaFX CSS system applies the following order of precedence to
determine the value of a styleable property (in ascending
47 matches
Mail list logo
