Hi Kevin, all,
I agree with this proposal and with the rationale behind it. It provides a
solid foundation for future consistent decisions as well.
- Johan
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:14 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> All,
>
> Even though we build JavaFX binaries with JDK 21 as the boot JDK, the
Based on feedback, I've moved the PR [1] for this enhancement [2] back
to 'rfr'. A Provisional CSR [2] is also ready for review (by one or more
people with a "Reviewer" role in the project).
Thank you.
-- Kevin
[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1370
[2]
+1- Marius
) {
case A -> "a";
case B -> "b";
}
evolving to
enum A { A, B, C };
previously comprehensive switch expression explodes.
-andy
*From: *openjfx-dev on behalf of Kevin
Rushforth
*Date: *Friday, February 16, 2024 at 14:12
*To: *openjfx-dev
*Subject: *Proposal: Bump mini
case B -> "b";
}
evolving to
enum A { A, B, C };
previously comprehensive switch expression explodes.
-andy
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Kevin Rushforth
Date: Friday, February 16, 2024 at 14:12
To: openjfx-dev
Subject: Proposal: Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX 23 to JDK 21
+1
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024, 15:37 John Hendrikx wrote:
> +1
>
> On 16/02/2024 23:11, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Even though we build JavaFX binaries with JDK 21 as the boot JDK, the
> > latest version of JavaFX still runs with JDK 17, although it isn't
> > tested with older JDK
+1
On 16/02/2024 23:11, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
All,
Even though we build JavaFX binaries with JDK 21 as the boot JDK, the
latest version of JavaFX still runs with JDK 17, although it isn't
tested with older JDK versions. In order for JavaFX to be able to use
newer JDK features, such as code
All,
Even though we build JavaFX binaries with JDK 21 as the boot JDK, the
latest version of JavaFX still runs with JDK 17, although it isn't
tested with older JDK versions. In order for JavaFX to be able to use
newer JDK features, such as code snippets (in API docs), record
patterns,
