Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
I'm trying to stabilize our openldap server farm before going live and
am finding that despite the contextCSN matching between providers and
replicas, the actual content of the server is getting out of sync.
This is most prominent when we are testing our population
On 15/11/2011 17:09, Clément OUDOT wrote:
I did not do it with Kerberos, but achieve it with LDAP behind
saslauthd. See this tutorial:
http://ltb-project.org/wiki/documentation/general/sasl_delegation
Perfect! Thanks. That's worked nicely.
As an aside, I've seen lots of debates here about
Thanks!
For now I wrote a script that compares the contextCSN of the root object,
but I am definitely going to play around with that backend when I get the
chance.
All the best,
Eli
2011/11/14 Michael Ströder mich...@stroeder.com
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
E.S. Rosenberg
Sorry but I did not understand what is your problem.
If you want to write on your 'slave' and want that change propagated to all
your servers, then you should search at slapd.conf manual for the updateref
option.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:08 PM, benoit ldap.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote:
Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
I'm trying to stabilize our openldap server farm before going live and
am finding that despite the contextCSN matching between providers and
replicas, the actual content of the server is getting out of
Hello Matheus,
i don't want to propagate change to the master server and schema: i can't
(no write access permission to it).
I want my slave to continue replicate from the master and to be able to add
new objects and add new attributes to existing one.
thank you
2011/11/16 xsun
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Jeffrey Crawford jeffr...@ucsc.edu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote:
Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
I'm trying to stabilize our openldap server farm before going live and
am finding that despite the contextCSN matching between
Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Howard Chuh...@symas.com wrote:
There are known bugs in syncrepl delete handling. ITS#7052 is probably
relevant here. The fix will be in 2.4.27.
Any idea when it will be released?
The release branch has been ready to go for a few
2011/11/14 Michael Ströder mich...@stroeder.com
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
I was wondering is it possible to set a slapd syncprov consumer to
trigger a script when it receives changes to the db (updates of
specific attributes).
You might want to
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote:
Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Jeffrey Crawfordjeffr...@ucsc.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Howard Chuh...@symas.com wrote:
Jeffrey Crawford wrote:
I'm trying to stabilize our
I think you may actually want is slapo-translucent, Basically it's
aproxy overlay with added local data on top of a bdb or hdb backend
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, benoit ldap.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Matheus,
i don't want to propagate change to the master server and schema: i can't
11 matches
Mail list logo
