Daniel Savard wrote:
Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 23:21 +0100, rey sebastien a écrit :
Hi,
One or two question about certificate compatibility,
I have self signed certificate generated by openSSL, and the official
package of openldap in Ubuntu is compilated with gnutls library. Do you
think this
Le jeu. 09 févr. 2012 23:53:25 CET, Daniel Savard a écrit :
Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 23:21 +0100, rey sebastien a écrit :
Hi,
One or two question about certificate compatibility,
I have self signed certificate generated by openSSL, and the official
package of openldap in Ubuntu is compilated
On 10/2/2012 1:52 μμ, Valentin Bud wrote:
Hello Community,
I am trying to setup LDAP replication using the syncrepl overlay. I am
using Debian Squeeze up to date as of today.
...
I have searched in the schemas for olcSyncProvConfig objectClass but
it is no where to be found. What do you
On Friday, 10 February 2012 01:04:09 Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Getting back to how to speed up restore:
If you do move to slapcat/slapadd, note that tuning slapd as described
in the Guide speeds up slapadd a lot, if you have not already done
that. So does the -q flag to slapadd.
Hi,
I am trying to use CAS-Openldap authentication for a local application. At
this point I am not sure if this error is a CAS problem or Openldap:
This is the error in catalina.out:
WHAT: simple bind failed: ldap1.curry.edu:389; nested exception is
javax.naming.CommunicationException:
Hi,
here the step i begin to make a clean migration between ldap(s) with
different version of gosa schema :
a ) I export all my users from old ldap + old gosa 2.6.2 into a backup
ldif file backup.ldif,
b) I create a new openLdap (last release version) on a server wich run
with all the new
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 5:05 PM +0200 Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
If you checkpoint, and you backup all the database files (including
transaction log files) in the correct order, you should not need to
db_recover (as database recovery can occur at a later time, if it
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 10:18 AM +0100 rey sebastien
reyma...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thanks for answer,
It's really silly to have an official version with GnuTLS if isn't
functionnal :(
GnuTLS is fairly buggy, and also has serious known security issues. GnuTLS
support was added at
Can you show the output of ldapclient list command and the ldif files
you used to add the solaris client to the LDAP server.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:32 PM, curious penguin pepe.the.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have ldap clients on two different OS platforms, Solaris and Linux.
When
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:35:12AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Thursday, 9 February 2012 21:00:36 Brian Reichert wrote:
FWIW: these scripts call out a bunch of reference URLs, that Oracle
has now broken:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2012 01:48:45 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
...
I thought I was very clear on that in my last email. It is not
sufficient. You need to stop slapd and run *db_recover*, which is more
exhaustive than db_checkpoint, if you want to
I am getting the following error when I attempt to add the account objectclass
to an existing LDAP account:
invalid structural object class chain (inetOrgPerson/account)
I read an explanation of which the cliffnote version was an person is a
person, not an account, so the two objectclasses
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 3:18 PM -0600 Andy Carlson
andy.carl...@moody.edu wrote:
While that logic makes sense, I have many accounts on a Sun Directory
instance that have both objectclasses. I am trying to migrate entries
from Sun to an existing OpenLDAP instance, but because of this
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012, at 03:18 PM, Andy Carlson wrote:
I am getting the following error when I attempt to add the
account objectclass to an existing LDAP account:
invalid structural object class chain (inetOrgPerson/account)
I read an explanation of which the cliffnote version was “an
person
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:00:29PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
** Note that the ordering of this is almost completely inflexible.
** In particular:
** (0) must preceed (5)
** (1) must preceed (2) and (3)
** (2) and (3) must preceed (4)
**
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:00:29PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
** Note that the ordering of this is almost completely inflexible.
** In particular:
** (0) must preceed (5)
** (1) must preceed (2) and (3)
**
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 3:32 PM -0500 Brian Reichert
reich...@numachi.com wrote:
Is management of a HDB backend's directory any easier?
back-hdb and back-bdb both use BDB as their data store. There is no
difference in how to handle backups between them.
--Quanah
--
Quanah
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:02:51PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
back-hdb and back-bdb both use BDB as their data store. There is no
difference in how to handle backups between them.
OK, thanks for the clarification...
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
For the records, I did upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4.28, latest stuff. It
doesn't solve anything.
How can I debug this problem? Anything else I can do?
THX
Daniel
Le vendredi 10 février 2012 à 12:59 -0500, Daniel Savard a écrit :
Le jeudi 09 février 2012 à 17:21 -0600, Dan White a écrit :
On
--On Friday, February 10, 2012 6:21 PM -0500 Daniel Savard
dsav...@cids.ca wrote:
For the records, I did upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4.28, latest stuff. It
doesn't solve anything.
If the issue is what version of Kerberos sasl is linked against, upgrading
OpenLDAP isn't going to help you at all.
20 matches
Mail list logo
