Hi all,
we have an very old openldap running and we need to migrate data to latest
openldap version. I create an ldif but the data in that file are encoded
base64. Is there a trick to disable that? My plan is to export everything
from openldap 2.2 database (lbdb) without base64 encoding so I can
Le 1 nov. 2012 13:52, Pörschke, Gunnar gunnar.poersc...@bvl.bund.de a
écrit :
Hi all,
we have an very old openldap running and we need to migrate data to
latest openldap version. I create an ldif but the data in that file are
encoded base64. Is there a trick to disable that? My plan is to
Ok, I have been running 2.4.32 for some time with no issues. Yesterday, 2
different servers (both part of a 4-way MMR) produced an index add
failure and an index delete failure. I went back over the bdb DB_CONFIG
Settings (listed below) and everything looks nominal to me. Would it just
make more
--On Thursday, November 01, 2012 12:36 PM -0400 Kyle Smith
alacer.cogita...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I have been running 2.4.32 for some time with no issues. Yesterday, 2
different servers (both part of a 4-way MMR) produced an index add
failure and an index delete failure. I went back over the
--On Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:24 PM -0200 Friedrich Locke
friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone aware of any buggy in openldap+bdb related to memory usage?
Have anyone here using this type of backend ? Any problem to report?
No. Yes. No.
I would suggest you provide some more
01.11.2012 20:24, Friedrich Locke пишет:
Is anyone aware of any buggy in openldap+bdb related to memory usage?
Have anyone here using this type of backend ? Any problem to report?
It's leaking. I think. Needs regular restart.
slapd-2.4.23+libdb-4.8.30
slapd-git-a54957b+libdb-4.8.30
--
WBR,
On 11/01/2012 05:24 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Is anyone aware of any buggy in openldap+bdb related to memory usage?
Have anyone here using this type of backend ? Any problem to report?
I guess it would help others if you mentioned the OpenLDAP version you
are referring to. Did check the
Is it possbile to use MMR to my advantage to switch over? For example, take
down 1 of the servers, switch the db config from bdb to mdb, and then
restart with a blank database (with appropriate structure) and have the MMR
take care of backfilling the mdb entries? Then I wouldn't have to export to
--On Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:04 PM -0400 Kyle Smith
alacer.cogita...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possbile to use MMR to my advantage to switch over? For example,
take down 1 of the servers, switch the db config from bdb to mdb, and
then restart with a blank database (with appropriate
--On Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:02 PM +0400 Roman Rybalko
openl...@romanr.name wrote:
01.11.2012 20:24, Friedrich Locke пишет:
Is anyone aware of any buggy in openldap+bdb related to memory usage?
Have anyone here using this type of backend ? Any problem to report?
It's leaking. I think.
01.11.2012 21:34, Quanah Gibson-Mount пишет:
Of course, if you use glibc instead of a decent memory allocator like
tcmalloc, you may see behavior where glibc leaks like a sieve.
Yep, I use glibc, let me try tcmalloc, will report if it leaks, thanks!
--
WBR,
Roman Rybalko
Thanks for the input, Quanah. I really appreciate it.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.comwrote:
--On Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:04 PM -0400 Kyle Smith
alacer.cogita...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possbile to use MMR to my advantage to switch over? For
Roman Rybalko wrote:
01.11.2012 20:24, Friedrich Locke пишет:
Is anyone aware of any buggy in openldap+bdb related to memory usage?
Have anyone here using this type of backend ? Any problem to report?
It's leaking. I think. Needs regular restart.
slapd-2.4.23+libdb-4.8.30
Kyle Smith wrote:
Ok, I have been running 2.4.32 for some time with no issues. Yesterday, 2
different servers (both part of a 4-way MMR) produced an index add failure
and an index delete failure. I went back over the bdb DB_CONFIG Settings
(listed below) and everything looks nominal to me. Would
14 matches
Mail list logo
