Re: OpenLDAP Sandbox on AWS/Eucalyptus

2012-12-09 Thread Howard Chu
Harold Spencer Jr. wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to share a blog I recently published. It shows how to build an OpenLDAP server (from git) on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS in Amazon Web Services and Eucalyptus using cloud-init. Hope you enjoy. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Looks nice, thanks

Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

2012-12-09 Thread Victor Sudakov
Michael Str?der wrote: Michael Str?der wrote: Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send is a good old rule. If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the client. I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the

Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

2012-12-09 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, December 10, 2012 8:59 AM +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: Michael Str?der wrote: Michael Str?der wrote: Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send is a good old rule. If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the

Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

2012-12-09 Thread Victor Sudakov
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Michael Str?der wrote: Michael Str?der wrote: Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send is a good old rule. If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the client. I still don't understand what's so

Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

2012-12-09 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:49 AM +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: You have lost me. The bad Outlook request is not about filtering, it's about sorting (ordering). It is ordering that is denied by the server. There is nothing about ordering in the link you have given.

Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

2012-12-09 Thread Philip Guenther
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote: You have lost me. The bad Outlook request is not about filtering, it's about sorting (ordering). It is ordering that is denied by the server. There is nothing about ordering in the link you have given. Let's look back at the message you're replying