Michael Ströder wrote:
Today I made a strange observation tested with release 2.4.32 and git-build
RE24 6f33e2c both with same results.
But when requesting to use the authz-DN with which the Samba demon binds the
attribute is not shown which one might consider an ACL issue. Note that
Michael Ströder wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Today I made a strange observation tested with release 2.4.32 and
git-build RE24 6f33e2c both with same results.
But when requesting to use the authz-DN with which the Samba demon
binds the attribute is not shown which one might consider an
harry.j...@arcor.de wrote:
This seems to be a bug:
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi?findid=7495
Any chance to see a fix for this in 2.4.34?
access to
dn.subtree=o=example
attrs=sambaNTPassword
filter=(organizationalStatus=0)
by group=uid=samba_dc,o=example write
As of version 2.4.27, I believe back-sql supports dynamic configuration,
so there's no need to switch to slapd.conf
see http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html :
OpenLDAP 2.4.27 Release (2011/11/24)
Added slapd-sql dynamic config support
Le 17/01/2013 07:11, Ori
Trying to switch to slapd.conf instead of dynamic configuration in
order to test the back-sql backend
As of version 2.4.27, I believe back-sql supports dynamic configuration, so
there's no need to switch to slapd.conf
see http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html :
OpenLDAP
2013/1/12 Meike Stone meike.st...@googlemail.com:
What I see, that slapd had reserved Total: 7350688K
(overcommitted?), but only referenced 4900700K.
Why does slapd reserve so much memory and use it not? Because of this,
I changed the default values for memory overcomittment
from:
Ori Bani wrote:
Trying to switch to slapd.conf instead of dynamic configuration in
order to test the back-sql backend
As of version 2.4.27, I believe back-sql supports dynamic configuration, so
there's no need to switch to slapd.conf
see http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html :
--On Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:23 PM +0100 Meike Stone
meike.st...@googlemail.com wrote:
I was wondering, why it crashed in spite of overcommitting .
The solution sometimes is simple, but far away ;-) ...:
~# ulimit -v
7353440
Ah, yes... This is an idiotic setting I've seen on SLES
--On Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:17 AM -0800 Ori Bani orib...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh! Thanks for the pointer. Anyone know if there's any chance the
documentation is going to be updated? It's over a year later and the
docs (and everything I saw in the list archives) say I must use
slapd.conf
On 01/17/13 17:10 -0200, Bruno Furtado wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
On 01/11/13 17:29 -0200, Bruno Furtado wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
On 01/10/13 12:04 -0200, Bruno Furtado wrote:
Hi Folks!
I'm newbie
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
What is the output of:
slapcat -n0 -s olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config
(remove any passwords or sensitive information)
Increase your debug level to see if you get any more specific information.
On 01/17/13 18:37 -0200, Bruno
11 matches
Mail list logo
