From: ctc...@hotmail.com
To: qua...@zimbra.com
Subject: RE: ldap query performance issue
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:37:18 +
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:06:51 -0700
From: qua...@zimbra.com
To:
Chris Card wrote:
Any ideas?
Increase the IDL range. This is how I do it:
--- openldap-2.4.35/servers/slapd/back-bdb/idl.h.orig 2011-02-17
16:32:02.598593211 -0800
+++ openldap-2.4.35/servers/slapd/back-bdb/idl.h 2011-02-17
16:32:08.937757993 -0800
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
/* IDL sizes - likely
Hello,
had the same problem years ago and the patch worked for me. As I
understood, this special problem exist in mdb too
(http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201301/msg00185.html)
Thats one reason, because I did not switch till now.
Thanks Meike
2013/5/24 Howard Chu
Sorry for top posting, google web client is hiding always the message
while answering *grrr*
Meike
Meike Stone wrote:
Hello,
had the same problem years ago and the patch worked for me. As I
understood, this special problem exist in mdb too
(http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201301/msg00185.html)
Thats one reason, because I did not switch till now.
Yes, back-mdb uses the same
--On Friday, May 24, 2013 5:38 PM +0200 Meike Stone
meike.st...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
had the same problem years ago and the patch worked for me. As I
understood, this special problem exist in mdb too
(http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201301/msg00185.html)
Thats one
