Q: empty groups (groupOfNames, member)

2013-12-06 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I had a problem with empty groups: object class groupOfNames has a MUST member attribute, so you cannot create an empty group. I consider this to be a bug in the object class definition, specifically as groupOfNames is structural, and not auxillary. So in SLES empty (POSIX) groups are

Antw: RE: OPENLDAP HANGS DAILY

2013-12-06 Thread Ulrich Windl
The original problem might have to do (I'm not sure) with mixing 32- and 64bit libraries, maybe? Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com schrieb am 05.12.2013 um 20:18 in Nachricht 75CAF0202FA5FCD98F0DD18E@quanah-mac.local: You can quickly upgrade if you use the LTB packages... Which are more

Re: Q: empty groups (groupOfNames, member)

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Ströder
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:49:45 +0100 Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote I had a problem with empty groups: object class groupOfNames has a MUST member attribute, so you cannot create an empty group. I consider this to be a bug in the object class definition, specifically as

Re: Q: empty groups (groupOfNames, member)

2013-12-06 Thread Howard Chu
Ulrich Windl wrote: Hi! I had a problem with empty groups: You and everyone else in the world. A quick search would turn up hundreds of posts on this topic. object class groupOfNames has a MUST member attribute, so you cannot create an empty group. I consider this to be a bug in the

Upgrading from Ubuntu-packaged 2.4.28 to self-built 2.4.38

2013-12-06 Thread Philip Colmer
Our current implementation of OpenLDAP is Ubuntu 12.04 running version 2.4.28 which has been installed as a package. To upgrade to 2.4.38, it looks like I need to remove that package and then install my own built binaries. Has anyone gone through this process before and got any tips/notes to

RE: Antw: RE: OPENLDAP HANGS DAILY

2013-12-06 Thread Borresen, John - 0442 - MITLL
I looked back through my original notes, and it was compiled with the 64-bit libraries (even ran ldd on slapd to double-check). Looking at the links, and the libraries something was changed in Feb 2013 (so, I wasn't the culprit as I was not here then). What I did as fix (no, not the best

Re: Upgrading from Ubuntu-packaged 2.4.28 to self-built 2.4.38

2013-12-06 Thread espeake
Phillip, I have done the exact same thing. And you can control where data is at through your configuration files. As far as the other directories that change, you definitely want to use folders other than what the distro version uses. That way you do not overwrite files that other systems may

Re: Upgrading from Ubuntu-packaged 2.4.28 to self-built 2.4.38

2013-12-06 Thread Ryan Tandy
On 13-12-06 03:39 AM, Philip Colmer wrote: Our current implementation of OpenLDAP is Ubuntu 12.04 running version 2.4.28 which has been installed as a package. To upgrade to 2.4.38, it looks like I need to remove that package and then install my own built binaries. The LTB project recently