The way I worked around this is to create new groups as groupOfNames
with a single empty member: attribute. It's never caused any problems
with any clients in my experience.
--
Liam Grettonliam.gret...@le.ac.uk
Systems Specialist
Do you use an existing member, or a non-existing dummy?
Liam Gretton liam.gret...@leicester.ac.uk schrieb am 09.12.2013 um 11:12
in
Nachricht 52a5979a.90...@leicester.ac.uk:
The way I worked around this is to create new groups as groupOfNames
with a single empty member: attribute. It's
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:12:42 + Liam Gretton liam.gret...@leicester.ac.uk
wrote
The way I worked around this is to create new groups as groupOfNames
with a single empty member: attribute. It's never caused any problems
with any clients in my experience.
Yes, working around it with
Hi,
We are looking at extending the allowed length of passwords we allow people to
use (the theory being that a short phrase is easier to remember than a shorter,
but arbitrary string of characters). But since we use our ldap server for
authentication to a whole host of online tools,
Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
We are looking at extending the allowed length of passwords we allow people to
use (the theory being that a short phrase is easier to remember than a
shorter, but arbitrary string of characters). But since we use our ldap
server for authentication to a whole host of
