Vikas Parashar wrote:
Yes, that should be. Because, you are using two structural class from
different chain.
Instead of account class, please use extensibleObject.
Using 'extensibleObject' is really bad practice.
Hint: One can easily define custom structural object classes adding the
Thanks Michael,
But instead of changing existing class, i think, it will be better if we
create a custom auxiliary class.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Michael Ströder mich...@stroeder.comwrote:
Vikas Parashar wrote:
Yes, that should be. Because, you are using two structural class from
Hi All,
I'm running openldap 2.4.36 on centos 6.3, 64 bit.
I'm finally trying out MDB as a replacement for BDB in our openldap setup, and
I've noticed that I'm getting MDB_BAD_VALSIZE errors when adding some DNs,
which could be added without error when using BDB as the backend:
52e9170b =
Chris Card wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running openldap 2.4.36 on centos 6.3, 64 bit.
I'm finally trying out MDB as a replacement for BDB in our openldap setup, and
I've noticed that I'm getting MDB_BAD_VALSIZE errors when adding some DNs,
which could be added without error when using BDB as the
While running our app (which seemed to be running slow on this last job), I
ended up receiving an rc:87 on a commit, which my app couldn't recover
from. I have verified that I have free disk space, free RAM.
Upon restart, after the db was opened, the first process started and
quickly reported an
Howard Chu wrote:
Subject: Re: MDB_BAD_VALSIZE error
Chris Card wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running openldap 2.4.36 on centos 6.3, 64 bit.
I'm finally trying out MDB as a replacement for BDB in our openldap setup,
and I've noticed that I'm getting MDB_BAD_VALSIZE errors when adding some
DNs,
Chris Card wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Subject: Re: MDB_BAD_VALSIZE error
Chris Card wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running openldap 2.4.36 on centos 6.3, 64 bit.
I'm finally trying out MDB as a replacement for BDB in our openldap setup, and
I've noticed that I'm getting MDB_BAD_VALSIZE errors when
Howard Chu wrote:
Chris Card wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Subject: Re: MDB_BAD_VALSIZE error
Chris Card wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running openldap 2.4.36 on centos 6.3, 64 bit.
I'm finally trying out MDB as a replacement for BDB in our openldap setup,
and I've noticed that I'm getting
On 2014-01-29 18:23, Chris Card wrote:
Can MDB_MAXKEYSIZE be increased?
(...)
In 2.4.36 the comment is:
* We require that keys all fit onto a regular page. This limit
* could be raised a bit further if needed; to something just
* under #MDB_PAGESIZE /
When we first deployed openldap a decade or so ago, we implemented regular
syncrepl rather than delta syncrepl because at the time the latter did not
support mirror mode. As part of a project to implement the password policy
overlay, we plan to switch to delta syncrepl to make the replication of
On 2014-01-29 16:58, Alain wrote:
While running our app (which seemed to be running slow on this last
job), I ended up receiving an rc:87 on a commit, which my app couldn't
recover from. I have verified that I have free disk space, free RAM.
Error numbers are OS-dependent. What's errno 87?
On 2014-01-29 23:10, Alain wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Hallvard Breien Furuseth
h.b.furus...@usit.uio.no wrote:
On 2014-01-29 16:58, Alain wrote:
While running our app (which seemed to be running slow on this last
job), I ended up receiving an rc:87 on a commit, which my app
12 matches
Mail list logo
