-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I hope I am on the right list for the problem I am experiencing.
We have two subnets
192.168.196.
192.168.222.
Our main LDAP servers run in 192.168.196. and are load-balanced by
round-robin DNS.
The 192.168.196. network is exhausted, so we
Hi!
Did you read the bind manual pages about sortlist?
Ulrich
Dennis Leeuw d.le...@umcutrecht.nl schrieb am 18.02.2014 um 10:33 in
Nachricht 530328f0.4090...@umcutrecht.nl:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I hope I am on the right list for the problem I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ulrich,
No I hadn't, didn't even know it existed. But reading up on it it
seems a server side configuration we do not have.
Running the getent several times on a host shows nice round-robin
behaviour, so my guess it is somewhere in the
Dennis Leeuw d.le...@umcutrecht.nl schrieb am 18.02.2014 um 12:24 in
Nachricht 530342de.2040...@umcutrecht.nl:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ulrich,
No I hadn't, didn't even know it existed. But reading up on it it
seems a server side configuration we do not have.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Urlich,
Did some more tests on more servers... and it seems that getent is
more static then I thought. Where 'host' nicely shows round-robin
behaviour, 'getent' does not.
Dennis
On 02/18/2014 12:09 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Did you read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/2014 12:09 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Did you read the bind manual pages about sortlist?
The official Bind 9 reference guide says:
The client resolver code should rearrange the RRs
as appropriate, that is, using any addresses on the
2014-02-18 12:50 GMT+01:00 Suresh Prajapati er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com:
Hi ,
We are migrating our infrastructure from Sun Solaris to AWS. So as a part
of migration we need to do the transition from Sun Directory Server to
OpenLDAP.
I exported the user database in ldif file from Sun LDAP.
h...@symas.com said:
In other words, may a txn span multiple dbis?
Of course. Where in the quoted doc is it ever implied otherwise?
Sorry, I was thinking about two separate things at the same time when I
wrote this, this one is not related to the quoted doc. Thanks for answering
anyway.
Hi Clément,
Thanks for your kind reply. I agree with you , that this migration is not a
one day project.
I've spent almost one week to do this but could not able to, hence the
mailing list :)
I've tried using the one liners listed in the page you have mentioned , but
there are lots of errors
for
h...@symas.com said:
Martin Lucina wrote:
mar...@lucina.net said:
The only thing which is somewhat unusual is that I use musl libc
(http://www.musl-libc.org/). However I also use this on my x86_64 dev boxes
and everything works fine.
I'm currently building an eglibc toolchain for MIPS just
mar...@lucina.net said:
current thread: t@1
=[1] mdb_txn_renew0(0x2fa88, 0x0, 0x, 0x0, 0x2f9f8, 0x2fa88), at
0x12ea4
[2] mdb_txn_begin(0xc, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffbff9bc, 0x2fa88, 0x2f9f8), at 0x1425c
[3] main(0x2f638, 0xffbff9bc, 0xffbffa34, 0x2f55c, 0x2f9f0, 0xee), at
0x1ded8
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/2014 01:37 PM, George Ross wrote:
Did some more tests on more servers... and it seems that getent
is more static then I thought. Where 'host' nicely shows
round-robin behaviour, 'getent' does not.
man 5 gai.conf perhaps?
Thanks!
All,
The long weekend didn't help...still at a loss. Question...
If the olcServerIDs look like, on all three servers:
olcServerID: 1 ldap://mm-server1.example.ldap
olcServerID: 2 ldap://mm-server2.example.ldap
olcServerID: 3 ldap://mm-server3.example.ldap
Should the Replica IDs (rid) in the
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Martin Lucina wrote:
mar...@lucina.net said:
current thread: t@1
=[1] mdb_txn_renew0(0x2fa88, 0x0, 0x, 0x0, 0x2f9f8, 0x2fa88), at
0x12ea4
[2] mdb_txn_begin(0xc, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffbff9bc, 0x2fa88, 0x2f9f8), at 0x1425c
[3] main(0x2f638, 0xffbff9bc, 0xffbffa34,
To the members of the mailing list,
Upon a test search I'm getting the following error:
$ ldapsearch -LLL -v -z none -x -e 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 -h bugsbunny.bar
-p -b ou=foo,o=bar -D uid=xxx,ou=foo,o=bar -w
((objectClass=groupOfUniqueNames)(displayname=*)) displayname
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:11 AM -0800 Auteria W. Winzer Jr.
wwin...@yahoo.com wrote:
To the members of the mailing list,
Upon a test search I'm getting the following error:
$ ldapsearch -LLL -v -z none -x -e 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 -h
bugsbunny.bar -p -b ou=foo,o=bar -D
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Auteria W. Winzer Jr. wrote:
To the members of the mailing list,
Upon a test search I'm getting the following error:
$ ldapsearch -LLL -v -z none -x -e 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 -h bugsbunny.bar -p -b ou=foo,o=bar -D
uid=xxx,ou=foo,o=bar -w
Quanah,
I should've been more detailed. The search isn't against an OpenLDAP instance.
It's against Oracle/Sun Directory Server 5.2 Patch_6.
Best Regards,
Auteria Winzer Jr.
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com
To: Auteria W. Winzer Jr.
Quanah,
The supported control does exists:
supportedcontrol: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 (VLV Request)
Regards,
Auteria Winzer Jr.
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com
To: Auteria W. Winzer Jr. wwin...@yahoo.com; openldap-technical@openldap.org
Sent:
HI All
I want a list of valid attributes for specific objectClass e.g.
I have a user abc with the dn of this user is
cn=Abc User,ou=accounts,dc=mydom,dc=com
the abc user has these object classes
posixAccount
shadowAccount
OrginizatinalPerson
yubikeyUser
now I want to get the valid schema
Will I need the -e
2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 since in the example below the attribute type I want
to use is -E sss=displayname, or will I still need the -e
option to correspond with the -E options?
Best Regards,Auteria Winzer Jr.
From: Aaron Richton
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Auteria W. Winzer Jr. wrote:
Will I need the -e 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 since in the example below the attribute type I want to use is
-E sss=displayname, or will I still need the -e option to correspond with the -E
options?
The ldapsearch(1) man page describes the
Martin Lucina wrote:
rich...@nbcs.rutgers.edu said:
Rebuilt with the Sun compilers to get proper debug info, the faulting
instruction is the same as the one in GCC:
signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address) in mdb_env_pick_meta at line 3349 in file
mdb.c
3349 return
Based on that output it looks like you're running the one-liners on the
Solaris box. You'll instead want to run them on the Ubuntu box, I suspect
you'll have much better luck with the syntax errors you're seeing.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Suresh Prajapati
er.sureshprajap...@gmail.com
phpldapadmin seems to do this when adding new attributes to an existing
entry (will only list the attributes valid for the objectclasses the entry
contains). You might want to check the source to see how they do it.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Umar Draz unix...@gmail.com wrote:
HI All
I
Umar Draz unix...@gmail.com schrieb am 18.02.2014 um 20:43 in Nachricht
caakre73be3w2ocwrpiadbza7compj0fq_ebplnpnlfu7gxu...@mail.gmail.com:
HI All
I want a list of valid attributes for specific objectClass e.g.
In Perl, you could use $schema-may($oc) to get the optionaly attributes for
Auteria W. Winzer Jr. wwin...@yahoo.com schrieb am 18.02.2014 um 21:00
in
Nachricht 1392753658.57245.yahoomail...@web181601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com:
Aaron,
The URL http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ldapext-ldapv3-vlv-09 can't be
found, yet I was able to access the 2nd link from the
27 matches
Mail list logo
