Re: Documentation

2016-04-30 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Saturday, April 30, 2016 3:21 PM -0700 Daniel Howard wrote: On Apr 30, 2016 1:03 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" wrote: --On Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:41 AM -0700 Daniel Howard wrote: My recent experience is OpenLDAP on

Re: Documentation

2016-04-30 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:41 AM -0700 Daniel Howard wrote: My recent experience is OpenLDAP on Ubuntu. I thought I would go with OpenLDAP's guide because they should know better, but the quick start was for older versions or something and hadn't been updated.

Re: Documentation

2016-04-30 Thread Howard Chu
Daniel Howard wrote: My recent experience is OpenLDAP on Ubuntu. I thought I would go with OpenLDAP's guide because they should know better, but the quick start was for older versions or something and hadn't been updated. I like documentation systems that allow for user feedback, comments, or

Re: Documentation

2016-04-30 Thread Daniel Howard
My recent experience is OpenLDAP on Ubuntu. I thought I would go with OpenLDAP's guide because they should know better, but the quick start was for older versions or something and hadn't been updated. I like documentation systems that allow for user feedback, comments, or patches via github. If

Re: Documentation

2016-04-30 Thread Gavin Henry
> > I guess what I'm trying to say, from my mobile phone, is if the documentation were more "agile" in engaging the community for identifying issues and taking in corrections, we may all be happier. > Some great feedback. Maybe we could host something like gitlab for this. Will have a chat on