Re: AccessLog behaviour

2011-02-05 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Just to share experience with the community, my problem was related to idlcachesize, that was (relatively) too small for the dimension of my db. I augmented that value to a very larger value and performances increases very much. Just to give a concrete example of what I'm saying, my purge job

AccessLog behaviour

2011-02-03 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi all, I would like to know the internal behaviour of slapo-accesslog. I would like to have accesslog with a data retention of 10 days. In my ldap usage scenario this retention produce an accesslog db of quite 10GB of data. Things are working quite fine, but when the log db contains data older

Re: AccessLog behaviour

2011-02-03 Thread Howard Chu
Marco Pizzoli wrote: Hi all, I would like to know the internal behaviour of slapo-accesslog. Read the slapo-accesslog(5) manpage. Re-read the logpurge description and don't skip any of it. I would like to have accesslog with a data retention of 10 days. In my ldap usage scenario this

Re: AccessLog behaviour

2011-02-03 Thread Marco Pizzoli
Hi Howard, probably you are addressing me to this part: When using a log database that supports ordered indexing on generalizedTime attributes, specifying an eq index on the* reqStart* attribute will greatly benefit the performance of the purge operation. My accesslog db is back-hdb and I have