Nick,
Nick Milas schrieb (28.04.2012 21:06 Uhr):
On 1/3/2012 6:32 μμ, Marc Patermann wrote:
from a provider with pre 2.4.30 (from Feb. 21st) and four consumers
with exact the same config (checked by md5sum), two with 2.4.26, one
with pre 2.4.29 and one with the same pre 2.4.30 version, I
On 1/3/2012 6:32 μμ, Marc Patermann wrote:
from a provider with pre 2.4.30 (from Feb. 21st) and four consumers
with exact the same config (checked by md5sum), two with 2.4.26, one
with pre 2.4.29 and one with the same pre 2.4.30 version, I get this:
...
Because even two server with the
Howard Chu wrote:
Marc Patermann wrote:
There are reverted commits in git (ITS#7162). Should a build again with
current git status?
Yes, build with current git.
Should we take this as a call to have a test round?
Ciao, Michael.
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Marc Patermann wrote:
There are reverted commits in git (ITS#7162). Should a build again with
current git status?
Yes, build with current git.
Should we take this as a call to have a test round?
Eh. I would look at the RE24 CHANGES file and see if
Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
Marc Patermann wrote:
There are reverted commits in git (ITS#7162). Should a build again with
current git status?
Yes, build with current git.
Should we take this as a call to have a test round?
Eh. I would look at the RE24
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:25:22 Marc Patermann wrote:
Howard,
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 14:22 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 12:08 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think
Buchan,
Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:
commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
Author: Howard Chu h...@openldap.org
Date: Sun Feb 12 21:07:25 2012 -0800
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:41:40 Marc Patermann wrote:
Buchan,
Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:
commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
Author: Howard
Buchan,
Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 12:48 Uhr):
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:41:40 Marc Patermann wrote:
Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:
commit
On 2/2/12 8:19 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:46 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro:openldap-git elecharny$ git archive
--format=tar --remote=git-master.openldap.org:~git/git/openldap.git
On 2/1/12 7:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:40 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
mich...@stroeder.com wrote:
Nick Milas wrote:
On 1/2/2012 12:19 μμ, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Any direction on how to test the build and to check out the branch in
order to run the
--On Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:46 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro:openldap-git elecharny$ git archive
--format=tar --remote=git-master.openldap.org:~git/git/openldap.git
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 openldap-2.4.26.tar
Permission denied
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:19:30 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:46 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro:openldap-git elecharny$ git archive
--format=tar
--On Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:41 PM +0100 Hallvard B Furuseth
h.b.furus...@usit.uio.no wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:19:30 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:46 AM +0100 Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
As for git archive --remote=git://git.openldap.org/openldap.git,
man git-daemon says this requires 'git config daemon.uploadarch
true'.
Requires it on the daemon side, that is.
--
Hallvard
On 31/1/2012 10:16 μμ, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
If you'd like to test it, that would certainly help make its release
be more towards the near future than the far future.
Thanks Quanah,
I would surely like to test it. However, I haven't got a clue on
building the software and our systems
On 1/31/12 9:16 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:58 PM +0200 Nick Milas
n...@eurobjects.com wrote:
On 31/1/2012 6:35 μμ, Marc Patermann wrote:
an additional fix will be in 2.4.29
Is there an anticipated (even approximate) release date for 2.4.29?
We never
Hi all,
last time I answered Quanah's testing call I simply downloaded the tgz from
gitweb and then compiled as usual.
This is the link I can find on gitweb:
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/heads/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4;sf=tgz
Hope this helps
Marco
On 1/2/2012 2:45 μμ, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
last time I answered Quanah's testing call I simply downloaded the tgz
from gitweb and then compiled as usual.
This is the link I can find on gitweb:
Nick Milas schrieb (01.02.2012 11:03 Uhr):
On 31/1/2012 10:16 μμ, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
If you'd like to test it, that would certainly help make its release
be more towards the near future than the far future.
I would surely like to test it. However, I haven't got a clue on
building the
2012/2/1 Michael Ströder mich...@stroeder.com
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:40 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
mich...@stroeder.com wrote:
Nick Milas wrote:
On 1/2/2012 12:19 μμ, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Any direction on how to test the build and to check out
Hi,
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some moment.
I attached two logs excepts in sync.log.
In the first except there is only a DEL
Jan 31 09:16:01 ldapserver slapd[10641]: conn=79138 op=2 DEL
Hi,
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some moment.
I attached two logs excepts in sync.log.
In the first except there is only a DEL
Jan 31 09:16:01 ldapserver slapd[10641]: conn=79138 op=2 DEL
Marc Patermann wrote:
Hi,
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some moment.
Already known, ITS#7052.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
Hi,
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 12:08 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some moment.
Already known, ITS#7052.
Thanks.
So this is fixed in 2.6.27 (and later).
The
Marc Patermann wrote:
Hi,
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 12:08 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some moment.
Already known, ITS#7052.
Thanks.
So this is fixed in
Howard,
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 14:22 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 12:08 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some
moment.
Already
Howard,
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 14:22 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
Howard Chu schrieb (31.01.2012 12:08 Uhr):
Marc Patermann wrote:
under some circumstances DEL don't get replicated to the consumers
(SyncRepl). I think this has to do with other changes at the some
moment.
Already
On 31/1/2012 6:35 μμ, Marc Patermann wrote:
an additional fix will be in 2.4.29
Is there an anticipated (even approximate) release date for 2.4.29?
Thanks,
Nick
--On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:58 PM +0200 Nick Milas
n...@eurobjects.com wrote:
On 31/1/2012 6:35 μμ, Marc Patermann wrote:
an additional fix will be in 2.4.29
Is there an anticipated (even approximate) release date for 2.4.29?
We never announce release dates. However, if you were
30 matches
Mail list logo