Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP

2011-10-26 Thread Brett @Google
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Sébastien Bernard s...@frankengul.orgwrote: Le 21/10/2011 01:55, Brett @Google a écrit : I was talking about the NEED for such a document, not talking about who authored / would author it. My point (perhaps unclear) was that openldap should have such a

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP

2011-10-21 Thread Sébastien Bernard
Le 21/10/2011 01:55, Brett @Google a écrit : I was talking about the NEED for such a document, not talking about who authored / would author it. My point (perhaps unclear) was that openldap should have such a document, or at least not 'dis those who try.. Maybe, the quick-start guide could

Google hits for OpenLDAP (was: Securing cn=config and allowing micro-engineering)

2011-10-20 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
Howard Chu writes: Zytrax.com is not a reliable source of OpenLDAP documentation. Most of what they advise is misguided or flat wrong. Yet Google(OpenLDAP cn=config)'s two first hits are at Zytrax. It's not surprising people keep using that stuff. Maybe the OpenLDAP site could be improved to

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP (was: Securing cn=config and allowing micro-engineering)

2011-10-20 Thread Brett @Google
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Hallvard B Furuseth h.b.furus...@usit.uio.no wrote: Howard Chu writes: Zytrax.com is not a reliable source of OpenLDAP documentation. Most of what they advise is misguided or flat wrong. Yet Google(OpenLDAP cn=config)'s two first hits are at Zytrax.

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP (was: Securing cn=config and allowing micro-engineering)

2011-10-20 Thread Giles Coochey
On Thu, October 20, 2011 16:20, Brett @Google wrote: I think the popularity of Zytrax guide on google indicates that there is a need for some simple guide or howto of how to get some sort of trivial ldap server running, in the first instance. Zytrax might fail with regard to accuracy in

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP (was: Securing cn=config and allowing micro-engineering)

2011-10-20 Thread Hallvard B Furuseth
Brett @Google writes: I think the popularity of Zytrax guide on google indicates that there is a need for some simple guide or howto of how to get some sort of trivial ldap server running, in the first instance. True enough, but also OpenLDAP website doesn't look like a shining example of

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP

2011-10-20 Thread Howard Chu
Brett @Google wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Hallvard B Furuseth h.b.furus...@usit.uio.no mailto:h.b.furus...@usit.uio.no wrote: Howard Chu writes: Zytrax.com is not a reliable source of OpenLDAP documentation. Most of what they advise is misguided or flat wrong.

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP

2011-10-20 Thread Michael Ströder
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote: Brett @Google writes: I think the popularity of Zytrax guide on google indicates that there is a need for some simple guide or howto of how to get some sort of trivial ldap server running, in the first instance. True enough, but also OpenLDAP website doesn't look

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP

2011-10-20 Thread Brett @Google
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote: Brett @Google wrote: Zytrax might fail with regard to accuracy in specific details as it seems to be infrequently updated (last August 2010, before that July 2009), but taken asis it gets people going such that they can at

Re: Google hits for OpenLDAP (was: Securing cn=config and allowing micro-engineering)

2011-10-20 Thread Brett @Google
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Gavin Henry ghe...@openldap.org wrote: Do we skip that bit and just talk about config or what? I'd be inclined to document a source build, from the current release, at least then people would end up with a newer version and dependencies were provided (bdb