No, you are never supposed to muck with any of the files inside slapd.d.
You slapadd the LDIF files, same way you would load any other LDIF file
into slapd.
Hi Howard,
I'm still having problems understanding the basis for this design.
Can you please elaborate on why the files in slapd.d are
b...@bitrate.net wrote:
On 2010.09.02 11.30, Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
cn=config is a slapd database and should be treated as such. The
contents are not vanilla LDIF files, and database internals are always
subject to change. It was designed to be used like other LDAP databases
No, you are never supposed to muck with any of the files inside slapd.d.
You slapadd the LDIF files, same way you would load any other LDIF file
into slapd.
Wow, okay. The online documentation doesn't make that clear at all
(especially when it talks about converting your old config).
Will Dowling wrote:
No, you are never supposed to muck with any of the files inside slapd.d.
You slapadd the LDIF files, same way you would load any other LDIF file
into slapd.
Wow, okay. The online documentation doesn't make that clear at all
(especially when it talks about converting your
Hi Guys,
Hope this is the right list for this, haven't been lurking here
previously so I don't have a feel for things yet.
I'm upgrading our OpenLDAP servers to use directory based configuration
under Ubuntu/Lucid and am having some problems including the provided
Cosine and iNetOrgPerson
--On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:46 PM +0800 Will Dowling
will+lists_openl...@autodeist.com wrote:
I hope this makes sense and that someone is able to help me understand
directory based configuration a little better.
You can't just symlink them. You have to copy them over, and then
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:46 PM +0800 Will Dowling
will+lists_openl...@autodeist.com wrote:
I hope this makes sense and that someone is able to help me understand
directory based configuration a little better.
You can't just symlink them. You have to
