FastDB also appears to use locking, while LMDB is MVCC and readers
Yeah, MVCC is the right thing ..
require no locks, so even with all of the other disadvantages out of the
way, LMDB will scale better across multiple CPUs.
So _one_ LMDB can be concurrently used from multiple threads and
Tobias Oberstein wrote:
FastDB also appears to use locking, while LMDB is MVCC and readers
Yeah, MVCC is the right thing ..
require no locks, so even with all of the other disadvantages out of the
way, LMDB will scale better across multiple CPUs.
So _one_ LMDB can be concurrently used from
Tobias Oberstein wrote:
Am 21.03.2013 21:58, schrieb Howard Chu:
Tobias Oberstein wrote:
Hello,
I have read the - very interesting - performance comparison
http://symas.com/mdb/microbench/
I'd like to ask if someone did benchmark LMDB (and/or the others)
against
Hello,
I have read the - very interesting - performance comparison
http://symas.com/mdb/microbench/
I'd like to ask if someone did benchmark LMDB (and/or the others)
against http://www.garret.ru/fastdb.html
FastDB is an in-memory ACID database that works via shadow paging, and
without a
