On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:41:00 +0100 (CET)
Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de wrote:
set following in slapd.conf
shm_key 100
Everything works well (thanks Christian and others!). I just want to
know if these logs are just warnings or messages after a reboot
(Note: shm_key is set
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:51:40 -0800
Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote:
I wonder whether switching to back-mdb would be a better solution.
If the machine is 64 bit, yes absolutely. If the machine is 32 bit,
depends on how large the DB can grow, since there's a 2-3GB limit on
the address space.
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, richard lucassen wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:51:40 -0800
Howard Chu h...@symas.com wrote:
I wonder whether switching to back-mdb would be a better solution.
If the machine is 64 bit, yes absolutely. If the machine is 32 bit,
depends on how large the DB can grow,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:14:14 +0100 (CET)
Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de wrote:
What happens if I symlink these files to a RAMDISK? And what happens
after a reboot or power outage? Do I get a corrupted database?
as others have said before configuring a shm_id would prevent those
files
Kratzer
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP on CF disk
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:14:14 +0100 (CET)
Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de wrote:
What happens if I symlink these files to a RAMDISK? And what happens
after a reboot or power outage? Do I get a corrupted database?
as others have said before
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:41:00 +0100 (CET)
Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de wrote:
set following in slapd.conf
shm_key 100
Ok, now I see, I looked at man slapd.conf, but apparently it's
mentioned in man slapd-bdb. And I did not find this because I googled
for shm-key instead of
You should be specifying shm-key to benefit from shared mem vs memory mapped
files
++Cyrille
Le 7 nov. 2013 à 12:04, richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org a
écrit :
Hello list,
I want to migrate some OpenLDAP servers from 3.5 disks to CF-disks.
The data in the OpenLDAP is only
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:08:28 +
Maucci, Cyrille cyrille.mau...@hp.com wrote:
You should be specifying shm-key to benefit from shared mem vs memory
mapped files
Ok, thanks for your answer Cyrille. Unfortunately, I'm not an OpenLDAP
guru, so I googled around a bit and found a lot of Zimbra
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:41:27 +0100
richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org wrote:
Oops:
Note: Although the slapd-config(5) system stores its configuration as
(text-based) LDIF files, you should never edit any of the LDIF files
directly. Configuration changes should be performed via LDAP
Maucci, Cyrille cyrille.mau...@hp.com wrote:
You should be specifying shm-key to benefit from shared mem vs memory mapped
files
I wonder whether switching to back-mdb would be a better solution.
Ciao, Michael.
Le 7 nov. 2013 à 12:04, richard lucassen mailingli...@lucassen.org a
écrit :
Michael Ströder wrote:
Maucci, Cyrille cyrille.mau...@hp.com wrote:
You should be specifying shm-key to benefit from shared mem vs memory mapped
files
I wonder whether switching to back-mdb would be a better solution.
If the machine is 64 bit, yes absolutely. If the machine is 32 bit,
--On Thursday, November 07, 2013 3:22 PM +0100 Michael Ströder
mich...@stroeder.com wrote:
Maucci, Cyrille cyrille.mau...@hp.com wrote:
You should be specifying shm-key to benefit from shared mem vs memory
mapped files
I wonder whether switching to back-mdb would be a better solution.
It
12 matches
Mail list logo
