I have no virus scanner, it's virtual machine.
I mean that in the same ENV and test condition, the windows version of
2.2.30 is 10x faster than the windows version of 2.4.38.
I'm reading the source code of 2.4.38 now, and i found the thread pool
related code(daemon.c tpool.c connection.c) has
Ferne Quinlan shimmy...@gmail.com schrieb am 18.12.2013 um 15:04 in
Nachricht
CAGMAECrG16Lc7viyQU7Z_uHfviBB04CcgZoqw2=h23dgse3...@mail.gmail.com:
Thanks for your reply.
But my test result is:
1. OpenLDAP 2.4.38 on Windows is about 10x slower than it on Linux. Not 2x
nor 3x as you say.
Thanks for your reply.
But my test result is:
1. OpenLDAP 2.4.38 on Windows is about 10x slower than it on Linux. Not 2x
nor 3x as you say.
2. OpenLDAP 2.2.30(the previous version we used) on Windows is almost the
same fast as Linux.
That makes me confused. Is there something related changed from
Hi,
Is there someone use openldap on windows? I found the query performance on
windows is too bad, Any solution or relevant official documents?
Ferne Quinlan wrote:
Hi,
Is there someone use openldap on windows?I found the query performance on
windows is too bad, Any solution or relevant official documents?
This has always been true. In our tests, while OpenLDAP on Windows is usually
over 10x faster than e.g. ActiveDirectory, it is
