2014-02-10 22:48 GMT+01:00 Warron S French warron.s.fre...@aero.org:
Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only
Yeah, I think Clement is aware of it already though.
This was fixed yesterday.
Clément.
On 07/02/14 21:01, Howard Chu wrote:
I've tested all the way up to 6.0.20. Didn't notice anything good or bad
about any of them, and all are slower than LMDB.
OK thanks for confirming this but the post on the Debian bug reporter
list
--On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:36 AM + Mark Cairney
mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
What version of BDB are you linked to? There are consistent reports of
deadlock issues with BDB 5.3. I would recommend against using that
version
of BDB. 4.7.25+patches has been solid for me. All
Mailstop: CH1-230
Desk: 571-307-5311
Cell: 703-967-8936
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com
To: Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk,
openldap-technical@openldap.org,
Date: 02/10/2014 04:09 PM
Subject:Re: Recommended version of BDB package
Sent by:openldap-technical
--On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:33 PM -0500 Warron S French
warron.s.fre...@aero.org wrote:
Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only
I noticed that the new OpenLDAP-LTB RPMs for CentOS are dependent on
berkeleydb-4.7, but they are failing and referencing berkeleydb-4.6.
It's kind of
To: Warron S French warron.s.fre...@aero.org,
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Date: 02/10/2014 04:46 PM
Subject:Re: Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low
Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only
--On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:33 PM -0500 Warron S French
warron.s.fre
Hi,
Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38,
Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and
found the following Debian bug report which suggests that BDB 5.X is
problematic with OpenLDAP.
What's the best version of BDB to go with- I see
--On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney
mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38,
Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and found
the following Debian bug report which suggests that BDB
On 07/02/2014 17:38, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney
mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38,
Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and
found
the
Mark Cairney wrote:
On 07/02/2014 17:38, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney
mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38,
Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible
10 matches
Mail list logo