Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only

2014-02-11 Thread Clément OUDOT
2014-02-10 22:48 GMT+01:00 Warron S French warron.s.fre...@aero.org: Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only Yeah, I think Clement is aware of it already though. This was fixed yesterday. Clément.

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-10 Thread Mark Cairney
On 07/02/14 21:01, Howard Chu wrote: I've tested all the way up to 6.0.20. Didn't notice anything good or bad about any of them, and all are slower than LMDB. OK thanks for confirming this but the post on the Debian bug reporter list

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-10 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:36 AM + Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote: What version of BDB are you linked to? There are consistent reports of deadlock issues with BDB 5.3. I would recommend against using that version of BDB. 4.7.25+patches has been solid for me. All

Re: Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only

2014-02-10 Thread Warron S French
Mailstop: CH1-230 Desk: 571-307-5311 Cell: 703-967-8936 From: Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com To: Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk, openldap-technical@openldap.org, Date: 02/10/2014 04:09 PM Subject:Re: Recommended version of BDB package Sent by:openldap-technical

Re: Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only

2014-02-10 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:33 PM -0500 Warron S French warron.s.fre...@aero.org wrote: Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only I noticed that the new OpenLDAP-LTB RPMs for CentOS are dependent on berkeleydb-4.7, but they are failing and referencing berkeleydb-4.6. It's kind of

Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only

2014-02-10 Thread Warron S French
To: Warron S French warron.s.fre...@aero.org, Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org Date: 02/10/2014 04:46 PM Subject:Re: Re: Recommended version of BDB package --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only --On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:33 PM -0500 Warron S French warron.s.fre

Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-07 Thread Mark Cairney
Hi, Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38, Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and found the following Debian bug report which suggests that BDB 5.X is problematic with OpenLDAP. What's the best version of BDB to go with- I see

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-07 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote: Hi, Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38, Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and found the following Debian bug report which suggests that BDB

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-07 Thread Mark Cairney
On 07/02/2014 17:38, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote: Hi, Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38, Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and found the

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

2014-02-07 Thread Howard Chu
Mark Cairney wrote: On 07/02/2014 17:38, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM + Mark Cairney mark.cair...@ed.ac.uk wrote: Hi, Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38, Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible