Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de schrieb am 16.12.2013 um 21:50 in
Nachricht alpine.bsf.2.00.1312162147180.27...@pohjola.cksoft.de:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karsten Heymann wrote:
Hi,
when setting up a cluster with 1+x masters and 1+x slaves, is it possible
to use a single cn=config
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Howard Chu wrote:
Christian Kratzer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karsten Heymann wrote:
Hi,
when setting up a cluster with 1+x masters and 1+x slaves, is it possible
to use a single cn=config replicated between all of these? Or do masters
and slaves need to have
Christian Kratzer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Howard Chu wrote:
Christian Kratzer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karsten Heymann wrote:
Hi,
when setting up a cluster with 1+x masters and 1+x slaves, is it possible
to use a single cn=config replicated between all of these? Or do
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Howard Chu wrote:
snipp/
One of the changes that has been waiting in the wings for a long time is to
move syncrepl config out of the olcDatabase entry and into its own olcOverlay
entry. At that point a lot of config needs will make a lot more sense, and
there'll be no
Hi,
thank you all for the clarification.
2013/12/17 Christian Kratzer ck-li...@cksoft.de
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Howard Chu wrote:
snipp/
One of the changes that has been waiting in the wings for a long time is
to move syncrepl config out of the olcDatabase entry and into its own
Hi,
when setting up a cluster with 1+x masters and 1+x slaves, is it possible
to use a single cn=config replicated between all of these? Or do masters
and slaves need to have different settings anyhow. I'd like not to have to
manage schema information and acls in two places.
Best,
Karsten
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Karsten Heymann wrote:
Hi,
when setting up a cluster with 1+x masters and 1+x slaves, is it possible
to use a single cn=config replicated between all of these? Or do masters
and slaves need to have different settings anyhow. I'd like not to have to
manage schema
