nothing else to do besides get faster
servers or add more replicas.
Thanks,
Amol.
- Original Message -
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: 03/12/12 03:36 AM
To: Amol Kulkarni
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
--On Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:51 AM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka
/queue at the consumer side which overflows? Can it be tuned?
Does a busy server drop replication requests?
Thanks,
Amol.
- Original Message -
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: 03/12/12 03:36 AM
To: Amol Kulkarni
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
--On Sunday, March 11, 2012 8
--On Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:51 AM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:
I see that I'm outdated in my tuning as per
http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/OpenLDAP_Performance_Tuning.
I'll do these changes and observe the servers.
In the mean time a new observation regarding syncrepl is
; there is no such thing as instantaneous propagation of
information in the real world.
Thanks and Regards,
Amol Kulkarni.
- Original Message -
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: 03/09/12 11:57 PM
To: Amol Kulkarni, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
-
From: Howard Chu
Sent: 03/10/12 01:29 PM
To: Amol Kulkarni
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
Amol Kulkarni wrote: Dear Quanah, Thanks a lot for these 2 pointers.
I'll check out the 2.4.30 version. We had used delta syncrepl earlier but our
accesslog size used to grow suddenly
--On Saturday, March 10, 2012 2:34 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:
That depends entirely on the speed of your server and network.
Taking the server part first - I'm also doubt that my provider server is
underpowered.
Following are the ldap specific parameters on our
-
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: 03/11/12 02:05 AM
To: Amol Kulkarni, Howard Chu
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
--On Saturday, March 10, 2012 2:34 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:That depends entirely on the speed of
your server and network. Taking the server
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
- 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and 50 consumers on wan
- The replication type is push - refreshAndPersist.
- There are about 0.5 million nodes
- The physical size of ldap folder is about 5gb.
- All the
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
This is your #1 issue.
- 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and 50 consumers on wan
This is your #2 issue.
Upgrade to a
On 3/9/2012 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version 2.4.23
This is your #1 issue.
..
Upgrade to a stable release.
Can we get rid of the
ashish gawarikar wrote:
Can we get rid of the stable version on openldap.org, which still says
2.4.23 is the stable version?
How about following-up here?
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/20/msg00046.html
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 10:45 AM -0800 ashish gawarikar
ash...@sendmail.com wrote:
On 3/9/2012 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni
amolkulka...@gmx.com wrote:
I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl :
- openldap version
Subject: Re: slow or inconsistent syncrepl
--On Friday, March 09, 2012 2:20 PM +0100 Amol Kulkarni amolkulka...@gmx.com
wrote: I have a following openldap setup with syncrepl : - openldap version
2.4.23 This is your #1 issue. - 1 provider and about 10 consumers in lan and
50 consumers on wan
13 matches
Mail list logo
