Dieter Klünter die...@dkluenter.de writes:
Hi Quanah,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:38:16AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 6:31 PM +0100 Dieter Klünter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a problem with OpenLDAP-2.4.23. That is I am trying to
setup
--On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:04 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Any idea what is going on?
On the master, in the accesslog overlay section for the main DB, you're
missing the following parameter:
logsuccess TRUE
On the master, in the accesslog database
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com writes:
--On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:04 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Any idea what is going on?
On the master, in the accesslog overlay section for the main DB,
you're missing the following parameter:
logsuccess TRUE
--On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:33 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
On the master, in the accesslog database section, you are missing the
syncprov overlay:
overlay syncprov
syncprov-nopresent TRUE
syncprov-reloadhint TRUE
This I realised after running test043 too, but
--On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:23 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
I am not convinced, as the consumer conducts a search operation on the
log database and not a sync operation, unless the consumer maintains a
local logdatabase. But others may clarify this.
There is
Hi,
I am facing a problem with OpenLDAP-2.4.23. That is I am trying to setup
a delta replication based on accesslog. Although the accesslog database
contains new entries and the log database is successfully read, no
replication ever takes place, while a setup without accesslog replicates
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 6:31 PM +0100 Dieter Klünter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a problem with OpenLDAP-2.4.23. That is I am trying to setup
a delta replication based on accesslog. Although the accesslog database
contains new entries and the log database is successfully
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 9:31 PM +0100 Dieter Klünter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Hi Quanah,
but I'm not sure, whether the consumer had read the accesslog database
and replicated based on this information, because no access to cn=log
has been logged.
If the replica has no data when it
Hi Quanah,
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com writes:
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 6:31 PM +0100 Dieter Klünter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a problem with OpenLDAP-2.4.23. That is I am trying to setup
a delta replication based on accesslog. Although the accesslog
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 10:05 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Hi Quanah,
Are you sure, that only a logbase statement as part of syncrepl
statements as reference to delta synchronization is sufficient?
Egh, no, you're right. I have:
syncrepl
--On Monday, November 29, 2010 10:46 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com writes:
OK, this is what I had, so going back to original configuration.
You had scope specified, and the missing new line between the syncrepl and
updateref
11 matches
Mail list logo