Veloso Varas, Sebastián (TECH-IT) wrote:
I would like to know if any of you. has had experience of integration of
AD with LDAP. My idea is to have a core LDAP and AD users consume.
Not sure what you really want. If you want simple replication from OpenLDAP to
AD this is not possible
On 05/24/10 03:34 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 05/24/10 01:11 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
What have you done to test it? As the README says, it operates when a
write operation occurs that may affect the membership of a given group.
Yes it does, I was was using the wrong search (searching on
Hi Dieter!
We tried
Sizelimit unlimited
In slapd.conf, but the effect is the same, slapd answers size limit
exceeded. The search request command is
/home/openldap/openldap-2.4.21-install/bin/ldapsearch -h localhost -p
9389 -D cn=openldapadmin -w welcome -b o=CustomerCA,c=de -s
Am Tue, 25 May 2010 15:51:40 +0200
schrieb Lehnert, Hartmut hartmut.lehn...@secunet.com:
Hi Dieter!
Thank you very much! I used CFLAGS=-DLDAP_COMP_MATCH when configuring
the slapd and now it's able to load our component match module.
But some problems are still left: When running the
Haven't heard anything on this yet...
If someone could point me to some documentation, or better, graphic
illustration, of how OpenLDAP 'works', perhaps I can figure this out on my own.
Thanks,
- chris
-Original Message-
From:
Am Tue, 25 May 2010 16:16:52 +0200
hi Hartmut,
schrieb Lehnert, Hartmut hartmut.lehn...@secunet.com:
Hi Dieter!
We tried
Sizelimit unlimited
Limits have to be defined on both sides server side and client side.
In slapd.conf, but the effect is the same, slapd answers size limit
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:11 AM +0200 masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote:
This way, the modification is atomic. As usual, this could be
accomplished by stacking an overlay that intercepts modifications to
specified attributes, like unicodePwd.
Can you formalize
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:11 AM +0200 masar...@aero.polimi.it wrote:
This way, the modification is atomic. As usual, this could be
accomplished by stacking an overlay that intercepts modifications to
specified attributes, like unicodePwd.
Can you formalize
Hello again,
My earlier thread appears to have been hijacked, so I'm starting a new
one for the summary of my investigations.
My current understanding is as follows:
There are three overlays that can use yes to manage groups dynamically:
dynlist, autogroup and memberof.
- dynlist works
Ian Collins wrote:
Hello again,
My earlier thread appears to have been hijacked, so I'm starting a new
one for the summary of my investigations.
My current understanding is as follows:
There are three overlays that can use yes to manage groups dynamically:
dynlist, autogroup and memberof.
On 05/26/10 02:40 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Hello again,
My earlier thread appears to have been hijacked, so I'm starting a new
one for the summary of my investigations.
My current understanding is as follows:
There are three overlays that can use yes to manage groups
Ian Collins wrote:
On 05/26/10 02:40 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Hello again,
My earlier thread appears to have been hijacked, so I'm starting a new
one for the summary of my investigations.
My current understanding is as follows:
There are three overlays that can use yes to
12 matches
Mail list logo
