Thanks.
What is the default maxsize ?
f.g.
> Le 10 sept. 2020 à 17:05, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:40 AM +0200 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As I understand mdb database should be in
> Le 31 août 2020 à 21:22, Howard Chu a écrit :
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:09 AM +0200 Frédéric Goudal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering about the correc
Hello,
I have an ldap master that from some reason has multiple CSN :
contextCSN: 20130927152219.157851Z#00#001#00
contextCSN: 20131127140429.597497Z#00#002#00
contextCSN: 20141208130549.278599Z#00#004#00
contextCSN: 20200831094837.531411Z#00#00a#00
Some are
Hello,
As I understand mdb database should be in memory.
Is there a way to calculate the correct amount of memory that should be
allocated to a server so the database fit with no swap ?
I guess the maxsize attribute should be set to a correct value too..
Thanks in advance
f.g.
Hello,
I’m wondering about the correct way to resync a directory in a push
configuration…
The setup is the following (as described in the documentation) :
- on the master I have added a second suffix with the hidden property and the
same suffix value.
- this suffix have an ldap backend on
Hello,
I have a strange problem of synchronization, since yesterday my slave servers
have a small difference of 2 or 3 minutes with the master. I mean the context
CSN of the slave is 3 mn earlier than contextCSN of the master.
My first question is the following : how the timestamp of the
Hello,
I’m in the way to replace our main ldap server with the moe nest recent
version. As the OS of the current one is quite old we will host it on a new
computer.
For now the architecture is the following :
master-ldap with two local replica via syncprov and another replica with a
proxy
> Le 5 mars 2021 à 17:31, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Friday, March 5, 2021 10:03 AM +0100 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the correction I understand better now.
>>
>> And than another quest
Hello,
I have a production ldap with some acl set. For historical reason the
synchronizationn is done with the root dn which is bad.
I want to add a user to perform synchronization it must have the right to read
everytthing.
is the acl :
access to * by dn.exact= break
added in first
unt a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, March 4, 2021 5:44 PM +0100 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a production ldap with some acl set. For historical reason the
>> synchronizationn is done with the root dn which is bad. I want to add
son-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:07 PM +0100 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> It works, I show you :
>>
>> against 2.4.0 openldap server
>>
>> nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 636
>>
>> So… it still d
> Le 22 févr. 2022 à 17:48, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
> --On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:45 AM +0100 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> For a legacy application we need to drop the ssl version available on our
>> openldap server.
>>
…
What do I miss ?
Or is it a feature ?
Thanks in advance
f.g.
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
0
modifiersName: cn=config
modifyTimestamp: 20220222083441Z
contextCSN: 20210308104755.920794Z#00#00e#00
contextCSN: 20211122120925.101869Z#00#018#00
contextCSN: 20220222083441.609985Z#00#019#00
So… it still does not work. What can I do ?
f.g.
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
Hello,
Well in fact I have found the problem : the access data base was corrupted due
to a previous lack of disk space.
Anyway I will fill a bugreport.
f.g.
> Le 13 sept. 2023 à 18:52, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 6:19 PM +0200
L && (*a)->a_nvals ==
(*a)->a_vals ) || ( nvals != NULL && ( ( (*a)->a_vals == NULL && (*a)->a_nvals
== NULL ) || ( (*a)->a_nvals != (*a)->a_vals ) ) )' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Is it a bug ?
f.g.
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
change our logging to query contextCSN through an
> ldapsearch, but we see advantages (no network, no authentication, etc, etc)
> in using slapcat as well.
>
> Is there anything we can do to update on-disk contextCSN more often..?
> We would expect " syncprov-checkpoint 100 1&q
(objectclass=posixgroup)
(memberuid=%uid%))
where %uid% would be the uid attribute value of the considered object. Or do I
miss solething ?
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
of objectClass GroupOfNames that will be
used to build the myMemberOf value (thus allowing to restrict the groups where
to search for membership ?
f.g.
> Le 17 oct. 2022 à 16:25, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Monday, October 17, 2022 4:51 PM +0200 Frédéric G
is
very low. OS is ubuntu 20.04
I don’t know where to dig...
Thanks in advance
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
on the master.
But I have a second problem on a more complex setup (replication in push mode)
and I will try to see what slapd watcher can do for me.
Thanks.
Fred.
> Le 13 oct. 2022 à 14:27, Shawn McKinney a écrit :
>
>
>
>> On Oct 12, 2022, at 9:25 AM, Frédéric
aster in 2.5 and consumers in 2.4 work's fine ?
>
> Thank's in advance for your replies.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Olivier
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
.
And to be a bit more precise, if we have a big number of values is one of the
two way best ?
Thanks in advance
f.g.
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
17:29, Howard Chu a écrit :
>
> Frédéric Goudal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I have to update records with mutlivalued attributes, and I wonder what is
>> the best (fastest, or lighter for the server) to do :
>>
>> - either just set the value w
ou have an explanation of the first anwser ? Is there any param that can be
in the request to cause the err=4 ? Maybe I should rise the logLevel to find
the difference between the two requests ?
Thanks in advance for any hint...
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
loadd isn’t ?
Thanks.
f.g.
—
Frédéric Goudal
Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP
+33 556 84 23 11
> Le 27 mars 2024 à 15:35, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:28 AM +0100 Frédéric Goudal
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to analyse the requests done to my ldapserver from a nas.
>> While br
27 matches
Mail list logo