Re: slapd dying, what next?

2010-02-08 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, February 08, 2010 11:05 AM -0600 Bryan J. Maupin bmau...@uta.edu wrote: Make sure your OpenLDAP build, etc, has debugging symbols. I've never done this, so just to be sure, to do this I need to pass CFLAGS=-g -O0 when running configure, then make install STRIP= when it's time

Re: slapd dying, what next?

2010-01-25 Thread Bryan J. Maupin
Well, I went ahead and built just the minimal tcmalloc (and upgraded it to 1.5 while I was at it), since that seemed to be something that needed to be fixed anyway. I installed it to one of our replica servers, and it ran for about 3 days, and then slapd died again this morning. So next I'm

slapd dying, what next?

2010-01-21 Thread Bryan J. Maupin
A few weeks ago, we upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.4.19. All seemed well, for about 4 weeks, and then within the last few days (starting Jan 14), slapd has been dying on our replica servers. It doesn't seem to follow any pattern, and the system seems fine when slapd dies; it isn't out of memory, and

Re: slapd dying, what next?

2010-01-21 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:39 AM -0600 Bryan J. Maupin bmau...@uta.edu wrote: We're running on RHEL 5.4, with Heimdal 1.2.1-3, OpenSSL 0.9.8k, Cyrus-SASL 2.1.23, BDB 4.7.25 (with patches), libunwind 0.99 (for Google tcmalloc), Google tcmalloc 1.3. libunwind is not required for

Re: slapd dying, what next?

2010-01-21 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:20 PM -0600 Bryan J. Maupin bmau...@uta.edu wrote: Using --enable-minimal will only create libtcmalloc_minimal.so, so you're saying that's enough, and we don't need libtcmalloc.so, which is what we're linking to now? Thanks! That's correct. :) --Quanah --