On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:11:53AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: OTC approve the release of 3.0 beta2 on Thursday 29th July
+1
Kurt
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR 16050 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process
> Proposed by Tim Hudson
> Public: yes
> opened: 2021-07-20
> closed: 2021-07-27
> accepted: no (for: 1, against: 3, abstained: 4, not voted: 1)
I don't find a call
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR 16128 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process
+1
Kurt
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:18:27AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: We should accept PR #16118 into 3.0 when completed and subject to the
>normal review process
This already seems to be merged, so I'll vote 0.
Kurt
> topic: We should fix the issue described in #16088 for 3.0
After reading #16088, I have no idea what this vote means, so I
will vote -1.
Please stop referring to a github issue or pull request as vote
text and actually describe what we're voting on.
Since this describes a regression against
topic: OTC approve the release of 3.0 beta2 on Thursday 29th July
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-07-27
closed: 2021-07-27
accepted: yes/no (for: 7, against: 0, abstained: 0, not voted: 2)
Matt [+1]
Pauli [+1]
Tim[+1]
Richard[+1]
Shane
topic: Accept PR 16050 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process
Proposed by Tim Hudson
Public: yes
opened: 2021-07-20
closed: 2021-07-27
accepted: no (for: 1, against: 3, abstained: 4, not voted: 1)
This vote is now closed:
accepted: yes (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 0, not voted:1)
On 22/07/2021 13:51, Matt Caswell wrote:
topic: Accept PR 16128 in 3.0 subject to our normal review process
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-07-22
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no
