On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:36 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> > topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
>
> -1
>
> Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0
> release?
>
>
I think we need some
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
-1
Do we need some general policy for such changes after the 3.0
release?
Kurt
-1 post closing of the vote for the record
Tomas
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 14:19 +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
> Proposed by Shane Lontis
> Public: yes
> opened: 2021-08-17
> closed: 2021-mm-dd
> accepted: yes/no (for: X, against:
The vote has closed and passed.
Pauli
topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
Proposed by Shane Lontis
Public: yes
opened: 2021-08-17
closed: 2021-08-18
accepted: yes (for: 5, against: 1, abstained: 1, not voted: 3)
Dmitry [+1]
+1
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:19 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
> Proposed by Shane Lontis
> Public: yes
> opened: 2021-08-17
> closed: 2021-mm-dd
> accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)
>
>Dmitry
topic: Accept PR#16286 into 3.0 subject to the normal review process
Proposed by Shane Lontis
Public: yes
opened: 2021-08-17
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)
Dmitry [ ]
Matt [-1]
Pauli [+1]
Tim[ 0]
Richard
