I have now closed this vote:
topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the
normal
review process
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-10-19
closed: 2021-10-20
accepted: yes (for: 4, against: 2, abstained: 4, not voted: 0)
Dmitry [+0]
0
Pauli
On 19/10/21 8:07 pm, Matt Caswell wrote:
topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to
the normal review process
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-10-19
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)
On the basis of further discussion I'm changing my vote to 0 which enables
this to pass now.
Tim.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 5:18 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 19/10/2021 19:31, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> > I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes
> > from today's
On 19/10/2021 19:31, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes
from today's meeting, but until then here is my recap.
We decided in the meeting that posting the minutes to the list wasn't
necessary and we would just push them to the repo:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the
> normal review process
+1
Kurt
I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes
from today's meeting, but until then here is my recap.
The discussion mostly focused on why the changes in #16725 are a
bugfix and not a new feature, which would be a prerequisite to be
admissible to be merged in the 3.0 branch.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the
> normal review process
So we have various people voting -1. Does someone want to explain
why they vote -1?
Kurt
topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the
normal review process
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-10-19
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)
Dmitry [+0]
Matt [+1]
Pauli [ ]