Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-20 Thread Matt Caswell
I have now closed this vote: topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened: 2021-10-19 closed: 2021-10-20 accepted: yes (for: 4, against: 2, abstained: 4, not voted: 0) Dmitry [+0]

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-20 Thread Dr Paul Dale
0 Pauli On 19/10/21 8:07 pm, Matt Caswell wrote: topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened: 2021-10-19 closed: 2021-mm-dd accepted:  yes/no  (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)  

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-20 Thread Tim Hudson
On the basis of further discussion I'm changing my vote to 0 which enables this to pass now. Tim. On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 5:18 PM Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 19/10/2021 19:31, Nicola Tuveri wrote: > > I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes > > from today's

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-20 Thread Matt Caswell
On 19/10/2021 19:31, Nicola Tuveri wrote: I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes from today's meeting, but until then here is my recap. We decided in the meeting that posting the minutes to the list wasn't necessary and we would just push them to the repo:

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the > normal review process +1 Kurt

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-19 Thread Nicola Tuveri
I believe Matt will find the time at some point to post the minutes from today's meeting, but until then here is my recap. The discussion mostly focused on why the changes in #16725 are a bugfix and not a new feature, which would be a prerequisite to be admissible to be merged in the 3.0 branch.

Re: OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:07:26AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the > normal review process So we have various people voting -1. Does someone want to explain why they vote -1? Kurt

OTC VOTE: Accept PR#16725

2021-10-19 Thread Matt Caswell
topic: Accept PR#16725 as a bug fix for backport into 3.0 subject to the normal review process Proposed by Matt Caswell Public: yes opened: 2021-10-19 closed: 2021-mm-dd accepted: yes/no (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T) Dmitry [+0] Matt [+1] Pauli [ ]