On 25/01/2019 20:16, Andrew Tucker wrote:
> I was doing some comparisons of XTS and GCM mode using the EVP APIs and found
> a
> discrepancy that seems to be an issue with XTS.
>
> In GCM mode if the buffer is encrypted in one call to EVP_EncryptUpdate or
> with
> several calls with smaller
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:09:40PM +0700, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> We could use this to determine what SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ is indicating. As it
> seems SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ could indicate two conditions in this scenario:
>
> 1) No pending bytes - Additional handshake messages were processed,
I was doing some comparisons of XTS and GCM mode using the EVP APIs and
found a discrepancy that seems to be an issue with XTS.
In GCM mode if the buffer is encrypted in one call to EVP_EncryptUpdate or
with several calls with smaller buffers the resulting ciphertext is the
same, as I would
Yes, it is a certificate error: a very stupid one.
I've used the wrong CA cert - from a different hierarchy.
I'm sorry for the hassle.
Nevertheless thanks for your support.
Carsten
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] Im Auftrag von