Jonathon,
How is it possible for someone to taint the nomination process? Are we
not allowed to promote our nominations? In light of the fact that the
process is closed and we can't know how many nominations we had
received, it seems fine to me to encourage nominations. Have some
unwritten rules
, Rick Clark wrote:
Jonathon,
How is it possible for someone to taint the nomination process? Are we
not allowed to promote our nominations? In light of the fact that the
process is closed and we can't know how many nominations we had
received, it seems fine to me to encourage nominations. Have
Who is the election official, running this election. Nomination should
be an open process, similar to the core dev process. It is currently
closed and subject to manipulation.
I would also suggest that if you are a candidate, you must not be
managing the process.
Rick
On 07/25/2012 06:44 PM,
On 02/04/2012 04:20 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2012/2/4 Soren Hansenso...@linux2go.dk:
The schedule on http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation says a
revised (or final?) mission statement would have been posted last week.
Ah, since I wrote my e-mail yesterday, it seems that page has been
to a provisional community
group that will pursue a foundation with vigor.
Rick Clark
On 01/04/2012 10:11 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
To adapt Mark Twain, rumors of the death of the foundation are greatly
exaggerated. = ) I hadn't actually heard that rumor yet and don't know where
it would be coming from
Hey Mark,
First of all, orthogonally, we are very lucky to not have Copyright
Assignment crushing this project. That is what the management at
Rackspace wanted, only NASA's inability to sign such a document
prevented it.
IANAL, but I was told by lawyers when we were in the planning stages of
I have a suggestion. Let's let the distros do whatever they want.
While we need a development platform, we are not required to provide
packages for each distribution. We got where we are today, because we
we have many ubuntu devs that are also openstack devs. Whether Ubuntu
takes the packages
On 08/25/2011 10:50 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
This is much more in line with other upstream projects.
http://pkg.jenkins-ci.org/debian/
http://download.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/
http://www.apache.org/dist/cassandra/debian
Hi All,
Is it required for new openstack API's to support both JSON and XML, or
would it be acceptable to only support JSON?
Cheers,
Rick
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
Both Dan and I are traveling today. So, unless someone really objects,
we would like to reschedule today's netstack meeting to the same time
tomorrow.
Cheers,
Rick Clark
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack
On 05/04/2011 06:58 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/5/3 Stephen Spectorstephen.spec...@openstack.org:
Finally, Hawaii sounds great until you see the cost of a Diet Coke in a
hotel – it is just too expensive.
Heh.. Have you even been to Europe? :)
At the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Prague, the
a few comments about a forum:
+ While I agree with Thierry that most end user apps have forums, some
SA/Dev oriented software also have forums.
+ I think there is a need for a place where people can ask simple
questions they would not feel comfortable asking on the ML.
- Forums are very
On 05/03/2011 09:36 AM, Jordan Rinke wrote:
Interesting because Ron very specifically mentioned being able to find
useful and relevant information on the Ubuntu forums without bothering devs
at the beginning of this discussion (which Soren then noted as an excellent
point).
I think there is
are working internally at my company to assign resources
to this effort.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+alex=mellanox@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+alex=mellanox@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Rick Clark
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:29 PM
To: Dan
On 05/02/2011 01:19 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
Thanks Rick,
CC'ing the openstack-list, based on Vish's request that all openstack
networking discussion be on the main list until we get too chatty and people
want to boot us off :)
I was planning to forward it to the list as well. That's where
Since the number of projects seems to be increasing daily, I think we
should create a #openstack-meeting schedule page on the wiki, so we
don't accidentally conflict. It would also be a central place to see
what teams are having IRC meetings and when to lurk.
I don't see any real reason to
+1
On 04/15/2011 02:55 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi all,
Ed Leafe (dabo) has been one of those developers that has stepped up
to the plate in code reviews and mailing list discussions. I'd like to
propose he join nova-core.
Cheers,
jay
___
As many of you know there are a few Network as a Service proposals
floating around. All of the authors are working to combine them into
something we all want to move forward with. Hopefully by the summit we
will have one blueprint to rule them all.
I would like to make a couple suggestions
Therefore, at this time, we are only proposing moving the code hosting
functionality to GitHub, and not radically changing any other parts of
the development and release process.
Soren, Monty, and Thierry, who are the developers responsible for
keeping our release management and
Blueprints serve three purposes. I don't claim they do them well, or
that we are using them well
1) they help us schedule technical discussions at the summit. We could
obviously do it some other way, but that is on of the current uses.
2) They let the various dev groups know what is being
+1
On 03/24/2011 02:40 PM, Trey Morris wrote:
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend more time reviewing code :)
Thanks,
-tr3buchet
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is
Jorge,
I thought this was supposed released as Creative Commons. All I can
find is the text below, which is not open. I think this is not
appropriate for something released as a part of openstack.
Rick
API v1.1 (03/01/11)
Copyright © 2009-2011 Rackspace US, Inc. All rights reserved.
This
I agree the 'os' designation is ambiguous and likely to cause some
confusion.
On 02/24/2011 04:36 PM, Eric Day wrote:
++
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:33:42PM -0800, Devin Carlen wrote:
This is a bit nitpicky but I'd rather see it called just nova, as in:
nova describe images
Who has strong
On 02/24/2011 04:53 PM, JC Smith wrote:
What about an interactive shell like IOS, vyatta, python shell, irb, etc
$ novashell
novashell show instances
novashell stop instance foo
novashell set instance foo memory 2048
novashell start instance foo
Then wrap it in SSHD and you can embed
+1 for jk0
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Jk0 has been contributing a lot and doing reviews even when they don't
count.
All reviews count :)
-jay
___
Soren will be running the network service infrastructure from the
Rackspace/Openstack side.
I want to temper this discussion by reminding everyone that Cactus will
be a testing/stabilization release. Feature freeze will come much
quicker and we want anything major changes to hit very early.
I
On 01/28/2011 08:55 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Rick Clark r...@openstack.org wrote:
I recognise the desire to do this for Cactus, but I feel that pulling
out the network controller (and/or volume controller) into their own
separate OpenStack subprojects is not a good
it is extremely
important that you you propose them by the deadline of February 3rd. It
will be extremely difficult to get an exception this release.
The Cactus release schedule is here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/CactusReleaseSchedule
Cheers,
Rick Clark
Project Lead
signature.asc
Description
style of the project, and probably a document describing the code review
process
After Cactus if the idea makes sense to split off then it can be pursued
then, but at the moment it is much too early to consider it.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Rick Clark r...@openstack.org wrote:
On 01/28
apropos background, and many of you may already know him.
http://openstack.org/blog/2010/09/community-manager-introduction/
He will be working hard planning our upcoming design summit. Please
give him a hardy welcome. I'm sure we will be hearing from him a lot.
Rick Clark
signature.asc
can read her personal blog and see a picture of her smiling face
here: http://justwriteclick.com/
I am sure you will all be hearing from her as she tries to whip our
release documentation into shape and helps build our community. I am
VERY excited to have her with us.
Rick Clark
OpenStack Chief
31 matches
Mail list logo
