On 05/09/2012 11:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com
mailto:ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Nice!
Here is the simplified version of my code (without ampq support,
counter stored directly to mysql db).
https://github.com/ss7pro/rescnt
Code is started from main.py which is constantly collecting counters
from libvirt and storing them in a mysql database.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Tomasz
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the simplified version of my code (without ampq support,
counter stored directly to mysql db).
https://github.com/ss7pro/rescnt
Code is started from main.py which is constantly collecting counters
from
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Nice!
For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection from
storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute node to require access to the
database server (that's an issue with nova that
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Nice!
For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection
from
storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute
I agree. Do you have any plans how to coordinate our efforts ?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
Hi
I could not agree more and this is the reason why I/O shows in the list of
meters shown in http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering (c5) disk IO in
megabyte per second has a high impact on the service
Hi,
I'd like to share my thoughts on metering openstack resources usage.
Except those data available from SystemUsageData and those mentioned
in blueprints some of the cloud providers charge for I/O on disk
drives (to prevent users from dd if=/dev/zero nosense and to teach
them properly
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur...@hp.com wrote:
Hi - I think a flexible aggregation scheme is needed; the levels of
aggregation available should be definable in the meter independent of the
sources of usage data themselves. If
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Fri, 04 May 2012 2:50
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Metering] schema and counter definitions
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur
On 05/04/2012 02:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur...@hp.com wrote:
Hi - I think a flexible aggregation scheme is needed; the levels of
aggregation available should be definable in the meter independent of
On 05/04/2012 11:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur...@hp.com wrote:
Hi - I think a flexible aggregation scheme is needed; the levels of
aggregation available should be definable in the meter independent of
Dachary
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Metering] schema and counter definitions
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Turner, Whit (Cloud Services)
whit.tur...@hp.com wrote:
Hi - I think a flexible aggregation scheme is needed; the levels of
aggregation available should be definable in the meter independent of the
sources of usage data themselves. If invoices need to be very
On 05/02/2012 07:19 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:05 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
- I agree that we don't want to go too far with aggregation and lose
On 05/02/2012 07:39 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:05 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
To prepare for the next meeting ( thursday 3rd, may 2012
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 10:08 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
My impression is that the notifications system is intended to cover
all
billable usage in at least Nova and Glance.
It's also my understanding. Regarding swift, how would you suggest we
approach the problem ? I see two possible courses:
There was a swift talk at the design summit that is related to (a):
http://etherpad.openstack.org/FolsomSwiftStatsd.
There is a good summary in the referenced blog post:
http://www.swiftstack.com/blog/2012/04/11/swift-monitoring-with-statsd/
-David
On 5/2/2012 4:19 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary
On 05/01/2012 04:38 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
To prepare for the next meeting ( thursday 3rd, may 2012
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda ) I cleaned up and
reorganized the Metering blueprint so that it ( hopefully )
incorporates all the information
I'm glad to see people championing the effort to implement metering. Is
there someway to refocus the enthusiasm for solving the metering problem
into engineering a general solution in OpenStack?
I'm just going to apologize in advance, but I don't think this project is
headed in the right
On 05/01/2012 05:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30,
On 05/01/2012 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
To prepare for the next meeting ( thursday 3rd, may 2012
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda ) I cleaned up and
reorganized the Metering blueprint so that it (
Hey,
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:05 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
- I agree that we don't want to go too far with aggregation and lose
useful data like which instances have
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 23:05 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Loic,
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:15 +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
To prepare for the next meeting ( thursday 3rd, may 2012
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda ) I cleaned
Hi,
To prepare for the next meeting ( thursday 3rd, may 2012
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda ) I cleaned up and
reorganized the Metering blueprint so that it ( hopefully ) incorporates all
the information temporarily stored in the etherpad (
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content of the following sections:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#Counters
I think the rationale of the counter aggregation needs to be explained. My
understanding is that the metering system will be
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content of the following sections:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#Counters
I think the rationale of the counter aggregation
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content of the following sections:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content of the
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com
Agreed, I would get as much low-level data as possible and let other systems
combine that as they want to form whatever billing model they choose.
On 4/30/12 6:49 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary
36 matches
Mail list logo
