Hi, all
I find a problem about pci-passthrough.
Test scenario:
1)There are two compute nodes in the environment named A and B. A has two NICs
of vendor_id='8086' and product_id='105e', B has two NICs of vendor_id='8086'
and product_id='10c9'.
2)I configured pci_alias={vendor_id:8086,
Hi all,
I want to know what's the name of IRC channel for novaclient? I want to ask
something about one BP.
And I don't know whether it exists or not, I don't find it in wiki[1].
If you know the information, please tell me. Thanks very much.
Best Wishes,
wingwj
---
[1].
Hi, all
I search the current blueprints and old mails in the mail list, but find
nothing about Guest NUMA and setting memory binding policies.
I just find a blueprint about vcpu topology and a blueprint about CPU binding.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-libvirt-vcpu-topology
Hi,
This is the same channel as nova – that is #openstack-nova
Thanks
Gary
From: wu jiang win...@gmail.commailto:win...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March
Hi everyone!
During investigation of this bug [1] I found weird things in horizon
page layout. And it looks like there are errors deep inside.
First, the* 'div.sidebar'* container has property *'float:left'
*without any width set while all guidelines [2] say that the width
should be set.
Was
Hi, stackers:
Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk formats,
including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support offline-extend volumes
currently.
Offline-extend volume will force the instance to be shutoff or the volume
to be detached. I think
Hi,
I recently deploy Bare-metal node instance using Heat Template. However, Nova
failed to spawn due to a timeout error. When I look into the code I found that
the timeout is related to Nova downloading disk image from Glance. The
nova-schedule.log shows below:
2014-02-28 02:49:48.046 2136
Greetings,
I wanted to ask if some cores could take a look at these reviews, The code
was pushed since 2 months and didn't get a lot of reviews. All of these
blueprints
are approved for icehouse-3.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65452/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65108/
Hi Gary,
Thanks for your information. I'll consult the BP in there. :)
wingwj
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the same channel as nova - that is #openstack-nova
Thanks
Gary
From: wu jiang win...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack
James Slagle wrote:
I'd like to ask that the following repositories for TripleO be included
in next week's cutting of icehouse-3:
http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator
http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-image-elements
Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
Something that came up recently in the Cinder project is that one of the
backend device vendors wasn't happy with a feature that somebody was
working on and contributed a patch for. Instead of providing a
meaningful review and
1)
I found modules tracked in openstack-common.conf is not consistent with
actual
modules in directoy 'openstack/common' in some projects like Nova. I
drafted a script
to enforce the check in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76901/. Maybe need
more work
to improve it. Please help review :).
2)
Yes..I will send a mail to Eugene Nikanorov, requesting to add this to the
agenda in the coming weekly discussion.
Detailed requirement is as follows:
In the current implementation, only one LBaaS configuration is possible per
tenant. It is better to have multiple LBaaS configurations for each
Hi Nikanorov,
Please add the below requirement to the agenda of coming weekly discussion on
Thursday.
Regards,
Srikanth.
From: Srikanth Kumar Lingala [mailto:srikanth.ling...@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:18 PM
To: Stephen Balukoff; Veera Reddy
Cc:
Hello Joe, Thierry, Sylvain.
Joe, I pretty agree with Sylvain in how he had described Climate idea. I
hope it is more understandable now.
Thierry, thanks for answering. I'm sorry I did not send this email before :)
Thanks
Dina
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Sylvain Bauza
Forgot to put openstack-tc@ in the loop... Sorry for resending this email.
-Sylvain
Le 03/03/2014 13:42, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Dina Belova
Hi Yuhan
I am a bit familiar with this change as we tried it in out POC [1] for IPv6
dual-stack. It achieves a similar function, as best as I understand, by
allowing multiple external bridges (and, therefore, external interfaces).
The feature I am providing here achieves approximately the same
I created a new blueprint [1] which is triggered by the requirement to
allow IPv6 Router Advertisement security group rule on compute node in my
on-going code review [2].
Currently, only security group rule direction, protocol, ethertype and port
range are supported by neutron security group rule
Maybe I am misunderstanding the debate, but imho Every OpenStack Service (XaaS)
needs to be listed in the Service Catalog as being available (and stable and
tested), and every instance of that service, when started, needs a service ID,
and every X created by that service needs a UUID aka object
Hi guys,
By checking the status of the patch at [1] by arezmerita, I noticed that it
didn’t get any reviews since the last upload on Jan 31th (after a comprehensive
round of reviews started on Dec 10th).
During a chat on #openstack-horizon, jpich noticed that the BP [2] was not
targetted, so
- Original Message -
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:14:19 -0500 (EST)
Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
[SNIP]
My feeling both with my product hat and my upstream documentation
contributor hat on knowing some of the issues we've had there in the
past is that one release
I'm please to announce that OpenStack Swift 1.13 has been released.
This release has some important new features (highlighted below), and
it also serves as a good checkpoint before Swift's final release in
the Icehouse cycle.
Launchpad page for this release:
On 03/01/14 at 07:24am, Jay Lau wrote:
Hey,
Sorry to bring this up again. There are also some discussions here:
http://markmail.org/message/5zotly4qktaf34ei
You can also search [Runtime Policy] in your email list.
Not sure if we can put this to Gantt and enable Gantt provide both initial
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.net
wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
Le 03/03/2014 05:33, Joe Gordon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:32
On 03/03/2014 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/03/2014 11:24 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
It looks like my patch fixes the first unit test failure. Though we
still need a fix for the 2nd problem:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'AbstractType'
Replying to myself...
It
On 03/02/2014 02:32 PM, Dina Belova wrote:
Hello, folks!
I'd like to request Climate project review for incubation. Here is
official incubation application:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/Incubation
Additionally due to the project scope and the roadmap, we don't see any
there are a lot of rules for HA or LB, so I think it might be a better idea
to scope the framework and leave the policy as plugins.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 03/01/14 at 07:24am, Jay Lau wrote:
Hey,
Sorry to bring this up again. There
On 03/02/2014 03:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/02/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I hope to get support from core reviewers here, so that we can fix-up
the SQLA 0.9.x compat ASAP, preferably before b3. Of course, I'll make
sure all we do works with both 0.8 and 0.9 version of SQLA.
On 2014-02-28 20:26, jackychen wrote:
hi,
I have commit a patch to sync notifier module under horizon with
oslo-incubator, I met the gate-horizon-python error, all the errors are aimed
at DatabseError.
Code Review Link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76439/ [1]
The specific
On 03/03/2014 08:14 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
I would be interested in your opinion on the impact of a V2
version release which had backwards incompatibility in only one
area - and that is input validation. So only apps/SDKs which are
currently misusing the API (I think the most common problem
Yes, it would be great if we can have a simple framework for future run
time policy plugins. ;-)
2014-03-03 23:12 GMT+08:00 laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.com:
there are a lot of rules for HA or LB, so I think it might be a better
idea to scope the framework and leave the policy as plugins.
On 03/03/14 at 03:00pm, Matthew Booth wrote:
PEP 8, under 'Programming Recommendations' recommends against implicit
comparison to None. This isn't just stylistic, either: we were actually
bitten by it in the VMware driver
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1262288). The bug was hard to
spot,
Hi all,
Just a friendly reminder we will have a workshop and QA meeting on
Freeonde #openstack-meeting channel today at 18:00 UTC (13:00 EST) for
folks interested in setting up or debugging third party CI platforms.
See you there!
Best,
-jay
___
+1
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On March 3, 2014 10:12:43 AM Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:30 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
Hey,
I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
recently. Unfortunately the folks that
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:51:59AM +0800, Xuhan Peng wrote:
Abishek,
The two attributes are editable if you look at Sean's patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52983/27/neutron/api/v2/attributes.py. The
allow_put is set to be True for these two attributes.
Xuhan
+1 - the attributes can
Hi Jay-
Thank you for the reminder.
Waiting to meet you at the IRC webchat.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Thanks for joining us today #openstack-meeting for our weekly community meeting.
As always, meeting minutes and log:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-03-03-16.00.html
Log:
Hi, team!
Please look at the commit .
Module 'mistral/model' now is responsible for object model representation
which is used for accessing properties of actions, tasks etc.
We have a name problem - looks like we should rename module 'mistral/model'
since we have DB models and they are
Hi Sean,
2014-03-03 16:04 GMT+01:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
At a high level this feels like this should be part of scheduling.
Scheduling might include resources you want right now, but it could
include resources you want in the future. It also makes sense for
scheduling to include
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday March 4th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
On 03/03/2014 10:00 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
PEP 8, under 'Programming Recommendations' recommends against implicit
comparison to None. This isn't just stylistic, either: we were actually
bitten by it in the VMware driver
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1262288). The bug was hard to
On 3 March 2014 11:27, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
It will certainly hurt the first one we nail on the wall. So here is one
reputational pressure: you don't want to be that company.
[1] http://fnords.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/the-dilemma-of-open-innovation/
-1.
That's a
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang zhangleiqi...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi, stackers:
Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk
formats, including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support
offline-extend volumes currently.
Offline-extend volume will
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.net
wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try to further explain.
Le
Joe, as said, Amazon reservation is not like implemented in Climate - and
really we had different original use cases to have the same result. Amazon
instances reservations do not guarantee that instance will be provided to
user, as in Climate we started implemented reservations possibilities with
Luke Gorrie wrote:
That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined
group.
I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to
openstack-dev to see if my reputation will be in tatters in the morning.
This spoiled my day today, and I have nothing to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
Capacity planning not falling under Compute's umbrella is news to me,
are you referring to Gantt and scheduling in general? Perhaps I don't
fully understand the full extent of what 'capacity planning' actually
is.
We
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
experts) I am inclined to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
Joe, as said, Amazon reservation is not like implemented in Climate - and
really we had different original use cases to have the same result. Amazon
instances reservations do not guarantee that instance will be provided to
On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
cheaper
Why? How does this save a provider money?
If an operator has zero information about the level of future demand,
they will have to spend a *lot* of money on excess capacity or
I updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO and the link at the
All TripleO Reviews at the bottom to include it.
On 03/02/2014 12:07 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a new repository to provide common code for tuskar and the
seed initialisation logic - the post heat completion initial
Hi folks, I’d like to propose adding Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a core reviewer
on the Marconi team. He has been contributing regularly over the past couple of
months, and has proven to be a careful reviewer with good judgment.
All Marconi ATC’s, please respond with a +1 or –1.
Cheers,
Kurt G.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving the existing v2 API instead of
putting out
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
cheaper
Why? How does this save a provider money?
If an operator has zero information about the level of future
Oh, Sylvain, you were first :)
I have just small things to add here: Joe, resource usage planning is great
feature, that, I believe, is not supported in OS services now. Resource
planning will allow cloud providers to react on future picks of loads,
because they *will know* about that. As Zane
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi folks, I’d like to propose adding Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a
core reviewer on the Marconi team. He has been contributing regularly
over the past couple of months, and has proven to be a careful
reviewer
On 03/03/2014 01:35 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
cheaper
Why? How does this save a provider money?
If an operator has
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
2014-03-03 18:32 GMT+01:00 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
This sounds like something that belongs in nova, Phil Day has an
elegant solution for this:
+1
From: Cindy Pallares
cindy.pallar...@gmail.commailto:cindy.pallar...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 1:41 PM
To: OpenStack Development
On 03/03/2014 01:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
1) What about tasks?
In some cases, the proposed integration of tasks is backwards
compatible. A task ID will be added to a header. The biggest point of
debate was if and how
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
Oh, Sylvain, you were first :)
I have just small things to add here: Joe, resource usage planning is great
feature, that, I believe, is not supported in OS services now. Resource
planning will allow cloud providers to
On 03/03/14 at 10:27am, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving
Guido kindly updated PEP-257 for us[1]. So now the hacking guide content
accurately matches PEP-257 (no extra line required at the end of a multi-line
docstring).
This alone should resolve the patch and comments that initiated this discussion.
With regards to automating the checks and gates,
Hi all,
This is just one another example of MySQL not having production ready
defaults. The original idea was to force setting the SQL mode to
TRADITIONAL in code in projects using oslo.db code when they are ready
(unit and functional tests pass). So the warning was actually for
developers rather
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.net
On 3 March 2014 23:12, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
James Slagle wrote:
I'd like to ask that the following repositories for TripleO be included
in next week's cutting of icehouse-3:
http://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator
On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
sets) and discussing the changes with some former coworkers (MySQL
experts) I am inclined to believe
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/03/2014 01:35 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/14 12:32, Joe Gordon wrote:
- if you're reserving resources far before you'll need them, it'll be
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:25 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
I believe we have some agreement here. Other openstack services should
be able to use a strongly typed identifier for users. I just think if
we want to go that
Thanks Khanh,
I see the potential issue with using threads. Thanks for pointing out. On using
containers, that sounds like a cool configuration but that should have a bigger
footprint on the host resources than just a separate service instance like I'm
doing. I have to admit that 100 fake
So that definitely got lost in translation somewhere, and is about to
have us spam icehouse users with messages that make them think their
openstack cluster is going to burn to the ground. Is there proposed
reviews to set those defaults in projects up already?
Remember - WARN is a level seen by
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:09 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 12:05 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Having done some work with MySQL (specifically around similar data
sets) and discussing the changes with
Thanks John,
What I'm trying to do is to run an asynchronous task that pre-organizes the
target hosts for an image. Then scheduler only need to read the top of the list
or priority queue. We have a paper proposed for the summit that will explain
the approach, hopefully it gets accepted so we
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/2014 01:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
1) What about tasks?
In some cases, the proposed integration of tasks is backwards
compatible. A task
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:18 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:25 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
I believe we have some agreement here. Other openstack
services should
Reminder that tomorrow we're back on the meeting schedule after having
last week off. Extra special note that the meeting is moved up a day
to Tuesday instead of being on a Wednesday last time.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#python-openstacksdk_Meeting
Date/Time: Tuesday 4 March -
-1 from me. Sounds like a way to avoid badly needed change and
innovation in the API. When, for example, would we be able to propose a
patch that removed API extensions entirely?
The inconsistent naming, capitalization, numerous worthless or pointless
API extensions, ability to do similar or
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:25 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So that definitely got lost in translation somewhere, and is about to
have us spam icehouse users with messages that make them think their
openstack cluster is going to burn to the ground. Is there proposed
reviews to set those defaults in
Hi all,
I'm working on a bug to fix the documentation for POST /servers.
Apparently, you can attach one or more networks to a server when you initially
boot it, but the networks element and associated attributes are not
documented here: http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute.html
Anyway, I
On 03/02/2014 09:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Coming in at slightly less than 1 million log lines in the last 7 days:
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 16:53 +, trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Jay-
I have the following doubts with my CI setup.
Hope presenting them before the meeting might help me with some more
guidance.
[1] sandbox-dvsm-tempest-full runs all the test cases where few fail, causing
David Peraza david_per...@persistentsys.com писал(а) в своём письме Mon,
03 Mar 2014 21:27:01 +0200:
Using compute inside LXC, I created 100 computes per physical host. Here
is what I did, it's very simple:
- Creating a LXC with logical volume
- Installing a fake nova-compute inside
On 03/03/2014 02:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
-1 from me. Sounds like a way to avoid badly needed change and
innovation in the API. When, for example, would we be able to propose a
patch that removed API extensions entirely?
v3 didn't address this at all, anyway. I'm not even sure there's
On 02/28/2014 04:22 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/26/2014 11:34 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/26/2014 11:24 AM, David Ripton wrote:
I'd like to release a new version of sqlalchemy-migrate in the next
couple of days. The only major new feature is DB2 support. If anyone
thinks this is a bad
Overall I think Climate is trying to address some very real use cases,
but its unclear to me where these solutions should live or how to
solve them. Furthermore I understand what a reservation means for nova
but I am not sure what it means in Cinder, Swift etc.
To give a few examples:
* I think
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 10:19 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
1) I'm not entirely sure that a provider attribute is even
necessary to
expose in any API. What is important is for a scheduler to
know which
drivers are capable of servicing a set of
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 01:31 -0800, Gary Duan wrote:
What are the parameters that will be part of flavor definition? As I
am thinking of it now, the parameter could be performance and capacity
related, for example, throughput, max. session number and so on; or
capability related, for example,
Here’s an interesting hack. People are getting creative in the way they use
Marconi (this patch uses Rackspace’s deployment of Marconi).
https://github.com/paulczar/logstash-contrib/commit/8bfe93caf1c66d94690e9d9c2ecf9ee6b458b1d9
@kgriffs
___
This seems like a reasonable and well thought out approach but It feels
like we are removing our ability to innovate. I know we are worried about
maintaining multiple APIs, but I’m still leaning towards putting the v3
API out and just keeping v2 around for a long time. Yes, its a maintenance
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:32:04 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
The v3 API effort has produced a lot of excellent work. However, the
majority opinion seems to be that we should avoid the cost of
maintaining two APIs if at all possible. We should apply what has
been learned to
I think its also pretty unfair on the people who put a lot of work
into the v3 API. We're seriously going to delete their code after they
put a year into it?
To me OpenStack isn't just the users, its also the development
community. I think we do measurable harm to that development community
by
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 15:24 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/03/2014 02:59 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
-1 from me. Sounds like a way to avoid badly needed change and
innovation in the API. When, for example, would we be able to propose a
patch that removed API extensions entirely?
v3 didn't
Thanks Sergey,
Will look into this, but still have the same question, would introducing
containers increase my footprint per fake compute service? I can run multiple
compute service in same hosts without containers. Containers give you a nice
isolation and another way to try a more realistic
On 2014-03-02 17:49:29 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
That said, infra isn't spinning up nodes properly, but manual testing
brings up nodes just fine with plenty of network speed, so we're not
sure whats up.
There were a couple problems... nova seemed very sure we were over
quota
On 03/01/2014 03:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't
participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some
community awareness.
[...]
Thanks for
Dear Solly:
I cobbled together a working prototype of Guru Meditation for Swift
just to see how it worked. I did not use Oslo classes, but used the
code from Dan's prototype and from your Nova review. Here's the
Gerrit link:
https://review.openstack.org/70513
Looking at the collected
David Peraza david_per...@persistentsys.com писал(а) в своём письме Mon,
03 Mar 2014 23:52:12 +0200:
Thanks Sergey,
Will look into this, but still have the same question, would introducing
containers increase my footprint per fake compute service?
Yes. There is more then one processes
On 03/03/2014 04:25 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
This seems like a reasonable and well thought out approach but It
feels like we are removing our ability to innovate.
I think part of this exercise is trying to think through what freedom
we *would* have to innovate in v2 with a set of changes
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving the existing v2 API instead of
putting out
On 3/3/2014 12:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion about the future of the v3 API
recently. There has been growing support for the idea that we should
change course and focus on evolving
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
