-
Inactive hide details for Sandy Walsh ---09/17/2013 02:27:00 AM---Hey
y'all! I took a little time to review most of the OpenStaSandy Walsh
---09/17/2013 02:27:00 AM---Hey y'all! I took a little time to review
most of the OpenStack projects
Email: flw...@cn.ibm.com
China Systems Technology Laboratory in Beijing
-
Inactive hide details for Sandy Walsh ---09/18/2013 08:43:03 PM---On
09/18/2013 04:49 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote: Hi Sandy,Sandy Walsh
---09/18/2013
makes sense. I've updated the report to reflect
his.
It would be nice to have the notification driver available out of the
box (perhaps as a plugin).
Cheers
-S
-Josh
On 9/16/13 11:20 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey y'all!
I took a little time to review most
Notifications work great.
Actually StackTach has a web interface where you can watch the notifications
coming through in real-time. We're slowing trying to get Ceilometer to have
this functionality.
StackTach works with Nova and Glance events currently.
https://github.com/rackerlabs/stacktach
Ceilometer, as it stands, ignores most notifications. We are working on full
event capture, but it's not there yet.
If you need to capture all events today, you might want to consider looking at
StackTach
https://github.com/rackerlabs/stacktach
-S
On 01/12/2014 10:03 PM, Shengjie Min wrote:
Hey guys,
In Ceilometer, is there a type of meter allows me to charge users based
on the uptime of the instances they have instead of cpu, memory utilisation?
All the best,
Shengjie
You may want to look at StackTach. It collects
OpenStack (and Python in general) isn't big on the classic Gang-of-Four Design
Patterns.
OpenStack code seems to stem more from a set of idioms starting with
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BasicDesignTenets
Beyond that, PEP8 and the HACKING guide are table-stakes.
From there, look at the main
Cool idea!
-S
From: Juerg Haefliger [jue...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 7:00 AM
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org Openstack
Subject: [Openstack] Announcing Dwarf - OpenStack API on top of libvirt/kvm
Hi all,
I have this little pet project of mine
Hi!
Nova can publish notifications on the queue whenever anything important happens.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/SystemUsageData
Tools like YAGI can consume these events and send them to downstream systems.
Or you could use something like StackTach to consume them and expose them via a
On 5/20/2014 7:32 AM, Narayanan, Krishnaprasad wrote:
Hallo all,
In our project, I need information about the VM related operations such as
creation, deletion, resizing, migration, reboot, etc. In one of my earlier
emails dated on 16th April 2014, I received replies from the forum about the
Side note: many groups are using StackTach to collect and persist the events
and then just accessing the StackTach database directly to generate their
usage/performance reports.
From: Narayanan, Krishnaprasad [naray...@uni-mainz.de]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Hi Lee,
At Rackspace we use StackTach to gather our billing/usage information (with
verification and reconciliation). We are heavy into our v3 development
currently.
While we haven't addressed the financial aspects of billing it might be
something worth talking about, though it's a little
From: Michael Mester (micmeste) [micme...@cisco.com]
Guys,
Im curious on who is using Zabbix to monitor their openstack deployment. I
know there is quite a bit of value to having the single pane of glass as well
as the scripting and API capabilities. I have
From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com]
The zmq driver in oslo.messaging, used for internal communication
between OpenStack services, has been without a maintainer for a
significant period of time. It isn’t actively tested, and it isn’t
clear whether or not it works. The Oslo team would like
From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com]
On Sep 5, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com]
The zmq driver in oslo.messaging, used for internal communication
between OpenStack services, has been without a maintainer
While not a billing system. Rackspace (and some others) use StackTach to
collect accurate (and verified) usage data from Nova and Glance.
https://github.com/stackforge/stacktach
We're getting close to GA for our new StackTach architecture (v3), which we
will be demoing at the Paris summit.
Sort of.
Openstack RPC-over-AMQP (oslo.messaging) automatically ack()'s all messages
that are received. So, it becomes the responsibility of the sender to retry.
For example, the scheduler in Nova does this. However, if the client fails
before getting the message, AMQP will automatically
Enable notifications on the compute nodes and you'll get
compute.instance.create.end and compute.instance.delete.end notifications for
these operations. It sounds like you only have them enabled on the
scheduler/api nodes currently.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/SystemUsageData
?Been keeping an eye on that project, but don't know of anyone running it
against OpenStack. Certainly shows promise though.
You may want to look at Monasca first though ... a little more tailored to the
OpenStack world. The monitoring/logging and big data world seem to be circling
on
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space
discussed
On 8/11/2014 5:29 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable
On 8/11/2014 6:49 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
not
cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
Many
folks feel that this technology is a viable
Sounds very interesting. We're currently collecting detailed (and verified)
usage information in StackTach and are keen to see what CloudKitty is able to
offer. My one wish is that you keep the components as small pip
redistributables with low coupling to promote reuse with other projects. Many
On 8/14/2014 11:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote:
Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite useful
technology. For many-to-many session its limit of 10 participants can be
an
Maybe we need to think about this from a distributed software perspective?
* Divide and Conquer?
Can we split the topics to create more manageable sub-groups? This way it's not
core-vs-non-core but intererested-vs-moderately-interested. (of course, this
is much the way the mailing list
On 8/14/2014 6:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Joe Gordon
joe.gord...@gmail.commailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann
d...@doughellmann.commailto:d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn
On 8/16/2014 10:09 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Sandy Walsh wrote:
I recently suggested that the Ceilometer API (and integration tests)
be separated from the implementation (two repos) so others might plug
in a different implementation while maintaining compatibility
On 8/18/2014 9:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Here's why folk are questioning Ceilometer:
Nova is a set of tools to abstract virtualization implementations.
Neutron is a set of tools to abstract SDN/NFV implementations.
Cinder is a set of tools to abstract block-device
Hey y'all,
We've started a screencast series on the StackTach.v3 dev efforts [1]. It's
still early-days, so subscribe to the playlist for updates.
The videos start with the StackTach/Ceilometer integration presentation at the
Hong Kong summit, which is useful for background and motivation but
Is there anything slated for the Paris summit around this?
I just spent nearly a week parsing Nova notifications and the pain of no schema
has overtaken me.
We're chatting with IBM about CADF and getting down to specifics on their
applicability to notifications. Once I get StackTach.v3 into
On 9/3/2014 11:32 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Sandy Walsh wrote:
We're chatting with IBM about CADF and getting down to specifics on
their applicability to notifications. Once I get StackTach.v3 into
production I'm keen to get started on revisiting the notification
format
. It's just a strawman, so
bend/spindle/mutilate.
Look forward to feedback!
-S
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NotificationsAndCADF
On 9/3/2014 12:30 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 9/3/2014 11:32 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Sandy Walsh wrote:
We're chatting with IBM about CADF
For those of you playing the home game ... just added four new screencasts to
the StackTach.v3 playlist.
These are technical deep dives into the code added over the last week or so,
with demos.
For the more complex topics I spend a little time on the background and
rationale.
StackTach.v3:
Jay Pipes - Wednesday, September 10, 2014 3:56 PM
On 09/03/2014 11:21 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 9/3/2014 11:32 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
I took some notes on this a few weeks ago and extracted what seemed
to be the two main threads or ideas the were revealed by the
conversation that happened
Hey Phil, (sorry for top-post, web client)
There's no firm rule for requiring .start/.end and I think your criteria
defines it well. Long running transactions (or multi complex-step transactions).
The main motivator behind .start/.end code was .error notifications not getting
generated in many
+1, the high-level code should deal with top-level exceptions and generate
.error notifications (though it's a little spotty). Ideally we shouldn't need
three events for simple operations.
The use of .start/.end vs. logging is a bit of a blurry line. At its heart a
notification should provide
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:51 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] - do we need .start and .end notifications
in all cases ?
On 09/22/2014 07:37 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote
)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Nomination of Sandy Walsh to core team
Hi There!
I¹m not 100% sure what the process is around electing an individual to the
core team (i.e., can a non-core person nominate someone?). However, I
believe the ceilometer core team could use a member who is more
On 12/18/2013 06:28 AM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
I would copy that question. Looks like integration plan didn't work out,
and healthnmon development either stalled or gone shadow..
Anyone have information on that?
I think that's the case. There was no mention of Healthnmon at the last
summit.
On 12/18/2013 01:44 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 12/18/2013 06:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 12/18/2013 9:42 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
The question came up in this patch [1], how do we deprecate and remove
keys in the notification payload? In this case I need to deprecate and
replace
On 12/18/2013 03:00 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
We really need proper versioning for notifications. We've had a
blueprint open for about a year, but AFAICT, nobody is actively working
on it.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/versioned-notifications
IBM is behind this effort
On 01/29/2014 11:50 AM, Swann Croiset wrote:
Hi stackers,
I would like to sharemy wonder here about Notifications.
I'm working [1] on Heat notifications and I noticed that :
1/ Heat uses his context to store 'password'
2/ Heat and Nova store 'auth_token' in context too. Didn't check
The notification system can specify multiple queues to publish to, so each of
your dependent services can feed from a separate queue.
However, this is a critical bug in oslo.messaging that has broken this feature.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1277204
Hopefully it'll get fixed quickly
At the Nova mid-cycle meetup we've been talking about the problem of helping
new contributors. It got into a discussion of karma, code reviews, bug fixes
and establishing a name for yourself before screaming in a chat room can
someone look at my branch. We want this experience to be positive,
This brings up something that's been gnawing at me for a while now ... why use
entry-point based loaders at all? I don't see the problem they're trying to
solve. (I thought I got it for a while, but I was clearly fooling myself)
1. If you use the load all drivers in this category feature,
And sorry, as to your original problem, the loadables approach is kinda
messy since only the classes that are loaded when *that* module are
loaded are used (vs. explicitly specifying them in a config). You may
get different results when the flow changes.
Either entry-points or config would give
On 03/04/2014 05:00 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:11 -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
Now, the actual concern is not related to any of that, but about whether
we're going to open this up as a new thing we support. In general, my
reaction to adding new APIs people expect to be
DSL's are tricky beasts. On one hand I like giving a tool to
non-developers so they can do their jobs, but I always cringe when the
DSL reinvents the wheel for basic stuff (compound assignment
expressions, conditionals, etc).
YAML isn't really a DSL per se, in the sense that it has no language
language implement the basics (expressions,
assignment...) and then building the domain ontop of that. Just seems more
natural IMHO, and is similar to what linq (in c#) has done.
My 3 cents.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Mar 6, 2014, at 5:33 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa
Yep, great idea. Do it.
On 03/07/2014 02:53 AM, Chris Behrens wrote:
On Mar 6, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
[…]
I think a dedicated git repo for this makes sense.
openstack/nova-blueprints or something, or openstack/nova-proposals if
we want to be a bit less
You may want to consider StackTach for troubleshooting (that's what it was
initially created for)
https://github.com/rackerlabs/stacktach
It will consume and record the events as well as give you a gui and cmdline
tools for tracing calls by server, request_id, event type, etc.
Ping me if you
Big +1
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:18 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi][TC] Withdraw graduation request
This is a very mature stance and well-written email. Thanks,
On 03/31/2014 10:55 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
I believe that ordering of notifications at different levels is not
guaranteed when receiving those notifications using a notification
listener in olso.messaging.
I.e. with something like:
notifier = notifier.Notifier(get_transport(CONF),
On 04/02/2014 05:47 PM, Gordon Chung wrote:
I'd like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Ceilometer.
Woot!
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 10/10/2013 06:16 PM, Neal, Phil wrote:
Greetings all, I'm looking at how to expand the ability of our CM
instance to consume notifications and have a quick question about
the configuration and flow...
For the notifications central agent , we rely on the services (i.e.
glance, cinder)
On 10/15/2013 12:28 PM, Neal, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Walsh [mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:20 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Notifications from non-local
exchanges
Notifications work great.
Actually StackTach has a web interface where you can watch the notifications
coming through in real-time. We're slowing trying to get Ceilometer to have
this functionality.
StackTach works with Nova and Glance events currently.
https://github.com/rackerlabs/stacktach
Here's the current adoption of notifications in OpenStack ... hope it helps!
http://www.sandywalsh.com/2013/09/notification-usage-in-openstack-report.html
-S
From: Qing He [qing...@radisys.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:48 PM
To: OpenStack
Hey y'all,
Here are a few notes I put together around some ideas for alarm improvements.
In order to set it up I spent a little time talking about the Ceilometer
architecture in general, including some of the things we have planned for
IceHouse.
I think Parts 1-3 will be useful to anyone
On 10/30/2013 03:10 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
I will -2 any patch that adds zookeeper as a dependency to Heat.
Certainly any distributed locking solution should be plugin based and
optional. Just as a database-oriented solution could be the default plugin.
Re: the Java issue, we already have
of this test splitting in general anyway.
-S
On 10/30/2013 04:20 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 10/30/2013 03:10 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
I will -2 any patch that adds zookeeper as a dependency to Heat.
Certainly any distributed locking solution should be plugin based and
optional. Just as a database
On 10/30/2013 04:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 31 October 2013 08:37, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
Doh, sorry, left out the important part I had originally intended.
The ZK unit tests could be split to not run by default, but if you're a
ZK shop ... run them yourself
On 10/30/2013 08:08 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/30/2013 12:20 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 10/30/2013 03:10 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
I will -2 any patch that adds zookeeper as a dependency to Heat.
Certainly any distributed locking solution should be plugin based and
optional. Just
On 10/31/2013 11:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Yes. I'm strongly opposed to ZooKeeper finding its way into the already
complex pile of things we use.
Monty, is that just because the stack is very complicated now, or
something personal against ZK (or Java specifically)?
Curious.
-S
On 10/30/2013 11:37 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a while now,
and I get the occasional push-back. I think this falls into a few
broad camps:
A - there is no test suite at all, adding one in
Seeing this thread reminded me:
We need support in the update script for entry points in olso setup.cfg to make
their way into the target project.
So, if update is getting some love, please keep that in mind.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
+1 on the inline method. It makes it clear when a notification should be
emitted and, as you say, handles the exception handling better.
Also, if it makes sense for Horizon, consider bracketing long-running
operations in .start/.end pairs. This will help with performance tuning
and early error
Hey!
We've ballparked that we need to store a million events per day. To that end,
we're flip-flopping between sql and no-sql solutions, hybrid solutions that
include elastic search and other schemes. Seems every road we go down has some
limitations. So, we've started working on test suite for
On 11/29/2013 11:41 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote:
I'm very interested in performance results for Ceilometer. Now we have
successfully installed Ceilometer in the HA-lab with 200 computes and 3
controllers. Now it works pretty good with MySQL. Our next
, where the bottlenecks are coming from, etc.
It might be nice to standardize on that so we can compare results?
-S
Thanks,
Nadya
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey!
We've ballparked that we
So, as I mention in the branch, what about deployments that haven't
transitioned to the library but would like to cherry pick this feature?
after it starts moving into a library can leave a very big gap when the
functionality isn't available to users.
-S
On 11/29/2013 03:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
So, as I mention in the branch, what about deployments that haven't
transitioned to the library but would like to cherry
On 12/01/2013 06:40 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com
mailto:sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 11/29/2013 03:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Sandy Walsh
On 12/06/2013 03:45 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov wrote:
Hello all,
We would like to push further the discussion on unified guest agent. You
may find the details of our proposal at [1].
Also let me clarify why we started this conversation. Savanna currently
utilizes SSH to install/configure
On 6/17/2014 7:04 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Folks,
A question for the taskflow ninjas.
Any thoughts on best practice WRT $subject?
Specifically I have in mind this ceilometer review[1] which adopts
the approach of using very fine-grained tasks (at the level of an
individual alarm
Nice ... that's always bugged me.
From: wu jiang [win...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:30 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Why is there a 'None' task_state between
'SCHEDULING'
Something to consider is the create the queue in advance feature is done for
notifications, so we don't drop important messages on the floor by having an
Exchange with no associated Queue.
For RPC operations, this may not be required (we assume the service is
available). If this check is truly
should be able to disable it for RPC in
oslo.messaging.
(I say should because I'm not positive some aspect of openstack doesn't
depend on the queue existing. Thinking about the scheduler mostly)
-S
On 06/27/2014 05:16 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Something to consider is the create the queue in advance
woot!
From: Mike Bayer [mba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Openstack and SQLAlchemy
Hi all -
For those who don't know me, I'm Mike
On 7/10/2014 5:52 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
TL;DR: do we need to stabilize notifications behind a versioned
and discoverable contract?
Thanks for dusting this off. Versioning and published schemas for
notifications are important to the StackTach team. It would be nice to
get this
On 7/10/2014 2:59 PM, Daniel Dyer wrote:
From my perspective, the requirement is to be able to have a consistent and
predictable format for notifications that are being sent from all services.
This means:
1. a set of required fields that all events contain and have consistent
meaning
2. a
On 7/10/2014 12:10 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Julien Danjou wrote:
My initial plan was to leverage a library like voluptuous to do schema
based validation on the sender side. That would allow for receiver to
introspect schema and know the data structure to expect. I didn't
On 7/15/2014 3:51 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 10:04 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
The data format that Ironic will send was part of the spec proposed
and could have been reviewed. I think there's still time to change it
tho, if
On 7/11/2014 6:08 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
The data format that Ironic will send was part of the spec proposed
and could have been reviewed. I think there's still time to change it
tho, if you have a better format talk to Haomeng which is the guys
If all you want to do is publish a notification you can use oslo.messaging
directly. Or, for something lighter weight, we have Notabene, which is a small
wrapper on Kombu.
An example of how our notification simulator/generator uses it is available
here:
On 04/15/2014 10:07 AM, George Monday wrote:
Hey there,
I've got a quick question about the RabbitMQ exchanges. We are writing
listeners
for the RabbitMQ exchanges. The basic information about the tasks like
compute.instance.create.[start|stop] etc. as stored in the 'payload'
attribute
Also, I find setting this in my localrc/local.conf helps debugging:
# get an actual log file vs. screen scrollback
LOGFILE=/opt/stack/logs/stack.sh.log
# gimme all the info
VERBOSE=True
# don't pull from git every time I run stack.sh
RECLONE=False
# make the logs readable
LOG_COLOR=False
On 5/6/2014 10:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
John Dickinson wrote:
One of the advantages of the program concept within OpenStack is that
separate code projects with complementary goals can be managed under the
same program without needing to be the same codebase. The most obvious
example
On 5/6/2014 1:48 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sandy Walsh wrote:
I'd be curious to know more what managed means in this situation? Is
the core project expected to allocate time in the IRC meeting to the
concerns of these adjacent projects? What if the core project doesn't
agree
From: Chris Dent [chd...@redhat.com] Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:07 PM
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Good goals. When Producer and Consumer know what to expect, things are
good ... I know to find the Instance ID here. When the consumer
wants to deal with a notification as a generic
From: Sandy Walsh [sandy.wa...@rackspace.com] Tuesday, October 07, 2014 6:07 PM
Haven't had any time to get anything written down (pressing deadlines with
StackTach.v3) but open to suggestions. Perhaps we should just add something to
the olso.messaging etherpad to find time at the summit
From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com] Tuesday, October 14, 2014 7:19 PM
It might be more appropriate to put it on the cross-project session list:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics
Done ... thanks!
___
Does this mean we're losing request-id's?
Will they still appear in the Context objects?
And there was the effort to keep consistent request-id's in cross-service
requests, will this deprecation affect that?
-S
From: Steven Hardy [sha...@redhat.com]
20, 2014 at 02:17:54PM +, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Does this mean we're losing request-id's?
No, it just means the implementation has moved from oslo-incubator[1] to
oslo.middleware[2].
The issue I'm highlighting is that those projects using the code now have
to update their api-paste.ini files
Nice work Angus ... great idea. Would love to see more of this.
-S
From: Angus Salkeld [asalk...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 1:32 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] How can we get
Hey y'all!
I'm taking a page from Angus and trying to pull together a list of StackTach
users. We're moving quickly on our V3 implementation and I'd like to ensure
we're addressing the problems you've faced/are facing with older versions.
For example, I know initial setup has been a concern
Thanks ... we'll be sure to address your concerns.
And there's the list we've compiled here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics
(section 4)
-S
From: Chris Dent [chd...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 2:45 PM
To:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-notifications
The big takeaways:
1. We want the schema to be external so other languages can utilize them.
2. JSON-Schema seems fine, but AVRO has traction in the Big Data world and
should be considered.
3. The challenge of have text-file based
Hey y'all,
To avoid cross-posting, please inform your -infra / -operations buddies about
this post.
We've just started thinking about where notification schema files should live
and how they should be deployed. Kind of a tricky problem. We could really use
your input on this problem ...
From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com] Thursday, November 20, 2014 3:51 PM
On Nov 20, 2014, at 8:12 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey y'all,
To avoid cross-posting, please inform your -infra / -operations buddies
about this post.
We've just started
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
