Hi Naveen:
The sooner you submit your blueprint the better, as Neutron core devs
can comment on it and help answer questions for you. You can implement
an ML2 MechanismDriver or a monolithic plugin, but if you file the BP
we can help you decide which may be better for your environment.
Keep in
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, NAVEEN R K REDDY naveen.kunare...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin,
1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release. The
question we have is there any deadline for the plugin
FYI:
I have moved the ML2 meeting per my email below. The new
timeslot per the meeting page [1] is Wednesday at 1600UTC
on #openstack-meeting-alt.
Thanks!
Kyle
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#ML2_Network_sub-team_meeting
On Nov 26, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest
Yes, this is all great Salvatore and Armando! Thank you for all of this work
and the explanation behind it all.
Kyle
On Dec 2, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Salvatore and Armando, thanks for your great work and detailed explanation!
Eugene.
On Mon,
On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Hi all,
At Cloudbase we are heavily using VMware Workstation and Fusion for
development, demos and PoCs, so we thought: why not replacing our automation
scripts with a fully functional Nova driver and
Some of the key people cannot make the meeting today, so
we're canceling it for today. I would ask that people review
the following two patches this week and we'll discuss them
in detail next week if they haven't merged by then:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21946/
On Nov 27, 2013, at 1:29 PM, George Shuklin george.shuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for reply!
Few more question:
AFAIK bridge tools is not very fast (compare to OVS), so adding them between
OVS and tap (instead of yet another OVS switch) is kinda slow everything
down. Why just not
Folks:
I'd like to propose moving the weekly ML2 meeting [1]. The new
proposed time is Wednesdays at 1600 UTC, and will be in the
#openstack-meeting-alt channel. Please respond back if this time
conflicts for you, otherwise starting next week on 12-4-2013
we'll have the meeting at the new time.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been recently debugging some issues I've had with the OVS agent, and I
found out that in many cases (possibly every case) the code just logs errors
from ovs-vsctl and ovs-ofctl without taking any action
HI all!
The Neutron Policy sub-team had it's first IRC meeting today [1].
Relevant logs from the meeting are here [2]. We're hoping to
continue the discussion going forward. I've noted action items
in both the meeting logs and on the wiki page. We'll cover those
for the next meeting we have.
On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
One more thing...
I'm thinking about the use case for Floating IPs in a NAT-less IPv6
OpenStack environment.
I can think in two use cases in a IPv6-Only Tenant Subnet:
1- the Floating IP might be used to
Yong, if you read Mark's proposal closely, the third party tests will only run
when the specific third party code is touched, or when the Jenkins user submits
code.
On Nov 17, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com wrote:
For third party testing, I am afraid these tests
On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Kanthi P pavuluri.kan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We are planning to implement quantum security groups using openflows for ovs
plugin instead of iptables which is the case now.
Doing so we can avoid the extra linux bridge which is connected between the
vnet
Folks:
The agenda for this week's ML2 meeting has been posted. I'd like
to focus 30 minutes or so on ML2 testing, and the rest on the
TypeDriver Summit Session. We need to add Tempest tests
around the main Open Source components of ML2. What is
lacking now is LinuxBridge and L2 Population Tempest
One other note: The meeting is still at 1400UTC, which for
people in most parts of the US means it's an hour earlier
now. If this meeting time isn't good for folks, we can discuss
moving this to a different time.
Thanks,
Kyle
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest
On Nov 15, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
Neutron Tempest code sprint to improve the status of Neutron tests in
Tempest
[1] for next week?
Thanks,
Kyle
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy
Thanks,
Mohammad
graycol.gifKyle Mestery (kmestery) ---11/13/2013 01:09:02 PM---On Nov 13,
2013, at 10:36 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote:
From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest
://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZbOFxAoibZbJmDWx1oOrOsDcov6Cuom5aaBIrupCD9E/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Stein, Manuel (Manuel)
manuel.st...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Kyle,
I'm
policy intent is left to the underlying plugin. This would be a good
thing to discuss at our meeting next week.
Thanks,
Kyle
Thanks,
Tim
- Original Message -
| From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Prasad Miriyala pmiriy...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi All,
A blueprint has been registered to add Nova vif driver support for Juniper
vrouter.
The Juniper OpenContrail Controller is a logically centralized but physically
distributed Software Defined Networking
.
That's what I suspect we need more input on from the rest of the Neutron
core team.
Thanks,
Kyle
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Prasad Miriyala pmiriy...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi All,
A blueprint has been
Hi folks! Hope everyone had a safe trip back from Hong Kong. Friday
afternoon in the Neutron sessions we discussed the Group-based
Policy Abstraction BP [1]. It was decided we would try to have a weekly
IRC meeting to drive out further requirements with the hope of coming
up with a list of
On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
+1, lets do it!
___
On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi.
I looked at the detailed API specification submitted by Edgar.
I think that the document Edgar shared does a fine job in discussion how an
API for managing logical topologies should work.
On the other hand,
On Nov 4, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Kyle Mestery (kmestery)'s message of 2013-11-05 06:35:04 +0800:
On Nov 2, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi.
I looked at the detailed API specification submitted by Edgar.
I think
How about if we do a developers lounge chat at 2PM Thursday?
On Nov 4, 2013, at 10:20 PM, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guys,
I just checked the schedule of unconference sessions. There are no free slots
anymore.
Yi
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
Hi Erik and
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2013-10-31 06:30:32 -0700:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 15:37 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
This is a bit of a social norms thread
I've been consistently asking for tests in reviews for a
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote:
On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
[...]
If we want to grow the committer base and help people to become
better reviewers, taking the time to show them the ropes is part of
the game.
hijacking
On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:15 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote:
On 10/31/2013 07:05 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
[...]
If we want to grow
Yong:
It's been a while, but I've had success with Ryu in the past. As Kaneko
points out, explaining the details of the issues you're hitting would help
us narrow things down.
Thanks,
Kyle
On Oct 27, 2013, at 5:09 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko ykaneko0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yong,
Could you explain
I think the trunk port BP referenced below (and registered by myself) would
likely solve this use case. There is no design summit session to discuss this,
but I hope to have an unconference slot in Hong Kong to discuss this with folks
who are interested.
Thanks,
Kyle
On Oct 28, 2013, at 4:34
Hi folks:
We don't really have an agenda today, so we're going to cancel the
ML2 meeting today. Depending on what ML2 items get selected for
the Summit, we'll likely meet next week to plan the discussions around
those.
One other note: Please keep an eye open for any bug fixes we should
backport
On Oct 22, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Gopi Krishna B gopi97...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Currently in Neutron the integration bridge (br-int) and other bridges
configured over each physical nic (e.g. br-eth0, br-eth1 etc) are being
configured in Compute and Network nodes. What is the logic behind or
Count me in on this discussion as well. May make sense to have a lightning talk
at the summit, or an unconference slot.
On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
swaminathan.vasude...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for your interests in the DVR feature.
We should
Folks:
A few of the key people cannot make today's ML2 meeting, so I'm going to cancel
it today. If you haven't filed your design summit sessions on ML2, please do so
by tomorrow! We have a list of them on the ML2 meeting page here [1] which we
collected over the past two weeks.
Also, Sukhdev
Whoops, hit send too quickly. The Url for [2] is:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51992/
On Oct 16, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
Folks:
A few of the key people cannot make today's ML2 meeting, so I'm going to
cancel it today. If you haven't filed
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:01 AM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
Current OVS Agent is creating tunnel with dst_port as the port configured in
INI file on Compute Node. If all the compute nodes on VXLAN network are
configured for DEFAULT port it is fine.
When any of the
Folks:
Just an update regarding the change to move devstack to default
to the ML2 Neutron plugin instead of the OVS plugin. The patch [1]
merged yesterday. Full tempest tests were passed with this, but
just a heads up for those using devstack without specifying a
Neutron plugin specifically.
Hi!
Next week at our regularly scheduled ML2 meeting [1] Wednesday at 1400 UTC
we'll be spending the majority of the meeting brainstorming topics for the
Icehouse Design Summit. I've added this to the agenda [2] with a couple of
high-level items that have already come up. If you have ideas for
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:05 AM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
We have gone through the below link for new plug-in development.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#Developing_a_Neutron_Plugin
Just want to confirm that is it mandatory to be Core Neutron
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
I just downloaded devstack and I am getting this error:
2013-08-06 11:28:28.938 TRACE nova Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-08-06 11:28:28.938 TRACE nova File /usr/local/bin/nova-api, line 10,
in module
Neutron and devstack folks:
I've written up some notes [1] on how I'd like to add per-MechanismDriver
support into devstack for ML2. This will be very nice to have as the number of
ML2 MechanismDrivers increase. My approach for this will allow for complex
configurations via localrc variables
While working on the OpenDaylight ML2 MechanismDriver, one thing which cropped
up was configuration file options for MechanismDrivers and were those should be
stored. I was initially of the opinion we should put all configuration sections
into the ml2 configuration file, but this could get
On Aug 4, 2013, at 1:20 AM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
Anyone in the community is working on the OpenStack Controller and OpenFlow
Controller Integration for Network and VM Information sharing.
High level approach on this is attached to this mail as PPT.
Idea is
On Aug 2, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Addepalli Srini-B22160 b22...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, current OVS Quantum agent is assuming that there are two
Openflow bridges (br-int and br-tun).
“br_tun”, I think, is introduced to take care of overlay tunnels.
With flow based
On Jul 31, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Remo Mattei r...@mattei.org wrote:
Hi everyone, I wonder if anyone has seen this error where neutron does
not start. here is the error I get with devstack. Any suggestions are
welcomed.
Remo
remo@openstack-ub:~/devstack$ cd /opt/stack/neutron python =
It is with great news I'm happy to report the Modular Layer 2 Neutron plugin
[1] is now fully supported in devstack. Instructions for configuring devstack
with ML2 are located here [2]. The ML2 team would greatly appreciate people
trying out ML2 with Neutron and devstack and reporting any
On Jul 18, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Aaron Rosen aro...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to raise another design failure of why creating the port on
nova-compute is bad. Previously, we have encountered this bug
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1160442). What was causing the issue
was
I've pushed out a review [1] to enable support for setting additional ML2
options when running with devstack. Since H2, ML2 has now added support for
both GRE and VXLAN tunnels, and the patch below allows for this configuration
when running with devstack. Feedback from folks on the Neutron ML2
On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Aaron Rosen aro...@nicira.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
[arosen] - sure, in this case though then we'll have to add even more
queries between nova-compute and quantum as nova-compute will need to query
I agree with Andre's concerns around the implications of polling in what Aaron
is proposing, and in fact, this is one reason the existing change is so nice.
The ML2 sub-team talked about this at a recent meeting, and we liked the
approach which Yong had taken with the patch. But as Andre says,
On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi Ivar,
thanks for your interest in Openstack and Neutron.
A few replies inline; I hope you'll find them useful.
Salvatore
On 10 July 2013 02:40, Ivar Lazzaro i...@embrane.com wrote:
Hi,
My name is Ivar
On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Filipe Manco filipe.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just published a blueprint for some work I'm starting right now. I would
appreciate if someone can take a look and give some comments.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/campus-network
Thank
also.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33148/
[2]
http://logs.openstack.org/33148/19/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron/1144/console.html
Thanks
Nachi
2013/7/9 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com:
I'm currently hitting issues with a patch [1] not passing Jenkins due
Just a reminder, we have our weekly ML2 sub team meeting Wednesday at 1400UTC.
The agenda is on the meeting page here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2
We have a number of ML2 related blueprints in review with a hope of getting
them in for H2 tomorrow, we'll focus on those in the
blueprint.
Thanks!
Kyle
It would help me if you have the time to take a look at the blueprint and
comment on the ML2 parts.
Thanks for your help!
Filipe Manco
http://about.me/fmanco
2013/7/9 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com
On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Filipe Manco filipe.ma
Folks:
I've written up some design notes [1] on the changes I'm making to the OVS
Agent, with the end result being something which functions with both the
existing standalone OVS Plugin, as well as in the context of ML2 where we can
support multiple plugins and tunneling technologies
Fixed, sorry about that!
On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com
wrote:
Hi Kyle,
It seems that the document is locked, could you provide the access code?
Thanks,
Edgar
On 7/2/13 8:32 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
I've been spending
commit.
Thanks,
Kyle
On 2 July 2013 23:05, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org
wrote:
On 2013-07-02 20:14:35 + (+), Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
I'm trying to submit a gerrit review for a commit which
59 matches
Mail list logo
