Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Stepping down as Watcher spec core

Thanks for all the hard work. best of luck, Susanne On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) < a.cha...@servionica.ru> wrote: > Antoine, > > Congratulations to the new step of your life! > You’ve set high level of project management and this is big honour to me > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

+1 On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Hidekazu Nakamura < hid-nakam...@vf.jp.nec.com> wrote: > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) > > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:48 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Nominate Yumeng Bao to the core team

+1 On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Hidekazu Nakamura < hid-nakam...@vf.jp.nec.com> wrote: > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) > > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:44 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Watcher] End-of-Ocata core team updates

Congrats everybody! well deserved. Jean-Emile thank you for all your hard work! On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Shedimbi, Prudhvi Rao < prudhvi.rao.shedi...@intel.com> wrote: > Thank You for giving me this opportunity. I will try to fulfill my role in > the Core team to the best of my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Watcher] Nominating licanwei to Watcher Core

+1 On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Vincent FRANÇOISE < vincent.franco...@b-com.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > +1 > > On 14/02/2017 11:27, ? ? wrote: > > His activity will help Watcher Team to make this project better. > -BEGIN PGP

Re: [openstack-dev] [Watcher] Nominating Prudhvi Rao Shedimbi to Watcher Core

+1 On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Prashanth Hari wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Joe Cropper > wrote: > >> +1 ! >> >> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Vincent FRANÇOISE < >> vincent.franco...@b-com.com> wrote: >> > >> > Team, >> > >> >

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Barcelona summit summary

Hi We had a super productive summit with many very active participants. Thanks to everybody who participated. Detailed minutes are available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-ocata-design-session We had a talk and 4 Watcher sessions during the summit. - The *first session*

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Mascot final choice

When will we know about the mascot as well as what the design looks like? Susanne On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Joe Cropper wrote: > +2 to Jellyfish! > > > On Jul 28, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Antoine Cabot > wrote: > > > > Hi Watcher team, > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Nominate Prashanth Hari as core for watcher-specs

+1 Susanne On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Чадин Александр wrote: > +1 > > ___ > Alexander Chadin, > Engineer > Software Solutions Department > Servionica Ltd. > Work email: a.cha...@servionica.ru > Mobile: +7(916)693-58-81 > > >

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Newton mid-cycle meetup details

The Watcher Newton mid-cycle developer meetup will take place in Hillsboro, OR on July 19-21 2016 For more details see the wiki [1] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_newton_mid-cycle_meetup_agenda Regards Susanne

[openstack-dev] [watcher] No IRC weekly meetings on December 23rd and 30th

Dear Watcher team Our weekly IRC meetings on December 23rd and 30th are canceled due to the holidays. Next meeting will take place on January 6th at the usual time on #openstack-meeting-4 at 1400 UTC. The team is atill available to answer questions and help on #openstack-watcher Regards Susanne

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next week's meeting make sense. Susanne On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups. Susanne On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups. Susanne On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: Hi All, I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in. https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

Make sense to me. Susanne On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote: Hi lbaas'ers, Now that lbaasv2 has shipped, the need for a regular weekly meeting is greatly reduced. I propose that we cancel the regular meeting, and discuss neutron-y things during

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Kilo Midcycle Meetup

Cool! Thx Susanne On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: It's set. We'll be having the meetup on Feb 2-6 in San Antonio at RAX HQ. I'll add a list of hotels and the address on the etherpad. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-kilo-meetup

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] meeting day/time change

Works for me. Susanne On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#LBaaS_meeting That is updated for lbaas and advanced services with the new times. Thanks, Brandon On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:07 +, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Mid-cycle hack-a-thon

Are we talking about a 5 day Hackathon or 3 day with 2 days (Mon Fri) for travel? On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.com wrote: Any chance it could actually be the week AFTER? Or is that to close to the holidays? _ On Nov 6, 2014 7:21 AM, Stephen Balukoff

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

Jorge I understand your use cases around capturing of metrics, etc. Today we mine the logs for usage information on our Hadoop cluster. In the future we'll capture all the metrics via ceilometer. IMHO the amphorae should have an interface that allow for the logs to be moved to various backends

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Floating IP management

Nice diagrams. :-) Thanks. Susanne On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Phillip Toohill phillip.tooh...@rackspace.com wrote: Diagrams in jpeg format.. On 10/12/14 10:06 PM, Phillip Toohill phillip.tooh...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello all, Heres some additional diagrams and docs. Not

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

-09-01 at 10:18 -0400, Susanne Balle wrote: Kyle, Adam, Based on this thread Kyle is suggesting the follow moving forward plan: 1) We incubate Neutron LBaaS V2 in the “Neutron” incubator “and freeze LBaas V1.0” 2) “Eventually” It graduates into a project under the networking

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia] Hi Susanne, I'm just trying to gain a good understanding of the situation here. More comments and questions inline. Salvatore On 2 September 2014 16:34, Susanne Balle sleipnir

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Using Nova Scheduling Affinity and AntiAffinity

Just wanted to let you know that sahara has move to server groups for anti-affinity. This is IMHO the way we should so it as well. Susanne Jenkins (Code Review) rev...@openstack.org 5:46 PM (0 minutes ago) to Andrew, Sahara, Alexander, Sergey, Michael, Sergey, Vitaly, Dmitry, Trevor Jenkins has

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

is still fully-open-source and (by way of our plan) available as part of OpenStack core. --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Friday

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

, Stephen On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong

[openstack-dev] Design sessions for Neutron LBaaS. What do we want/need?

LBaaS team, As we discussed in the Weekly LBaaS meeting this morning we should make sure we get the design sessions scheduled that we are interested in. We currently agreed on the following: * Neutron LBaaS. we want to schedule 2 sessions. I am assuming that we want to go over status and also

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBass] Design sessions for Neutron LBaaS. What do we want/need?

With a corrected Subject. Susanne On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: LBaaS team, As we discussed in the Weekly LBaaS meeting this morning we should make sure we get the design sessions scheduled that we are interested in. We currently agreed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Using Nova Scheduling Affinity and AntiAffinity

Brandon I am not sure how ready that nova feature is for general use and have asked our nova lead about that. He is on vacation but should be back by the start of next week. I believe this is the right approach for us moving forward. We cannot make it mandatory to run the 2 filters but we can

Re: [openstack-dev] Design sessions for Neutron LBaaS. What do we want/need?

Let's use a different email thread to discuss if Octavia should be part of the Neutron incubator project right away or not. I would like to keep the two discussions separate. Susanne On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: LBaaS team, As we discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBass] Design sessions for Neutron LBaaS. What do we want/need?

to have that discussion in another thread, or should we use this one? Stephen On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: With a corrected Subject. Susanne On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: LBaaS team, As we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Octavia VM image design

I agree with Michael. We need to use the OpenStack tooling. Sahara is encountering some of the same issues we are as they are building up their hadoop VM/clusters. See http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/userdoc/vanilla_plugin.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Using Nova Scheduling Affinity and AntiAffinity

was hoping we could do a combination of both but we can make it work with those filters I believe. Thanks, Brandon On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 14:56 -0400, Susanne Balle wrote: Brandon I am

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong in Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator. The Pros: * Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the info on incubation: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects Susanne On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use cases with regards to VIP and routers

, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: Gang, I was asked the following questions around our Neutron LBaaS use cases: 1. Will there be a scenario where the ³VIP² port will be in a different Node, from all the Member ³VMs² in a pool. 2. Also how likely is it for the LBaaS configured subnet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

I agree with Doug as well. We should update the current patch. Susanne On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, I took a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105331/ and had one minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Minutes from 8/6/2014 meeting

Great notes! thanks it helped me catch up after vacation. :) On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote: On where to capture notes like this long-term: I would say the wiki is more searchable for now. When we make the transition to IRC meetings, then the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use cases with regards to VIP and routers

Gang, I was asked the following questions around our Neutron LBaaS use cases: 1. Will there be a scenario where the “VIP” port will be in a different Node, from all the Member “VMs” in a pool. 2. Also how likely is it for the LBaaS configured subnet to not have a “router” and just use the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] topics for Thurday's Weekly LBaaS meeting's agenda

Hi I would like to discuss what talks we plan to do at the Paris' summit and who will be submitting what? The deadline for submitting talks is July 28 so it is approaching. Also how many working sessions do we need? and what prep work do we need to do before the summit. I am personally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS API Version 2 WIP in gerrit

Will take a look :-) Thanks for the huge amount of work put into this. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.com wrote: Hi Brandon I think the patch should be broken into few standalone sub patches. As for now it is huge and review is a challenge :) Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Status of entities that do not exist in a driver backend

+1 to QUEUED status. On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi German, That actually brings up another thing that needs to be done. There is no DELETED state. When an entity is deleted, it is deleted from the database. I'd prefer a DELETED state

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Flavor framework: Conclusion

+1 On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: We're coming down to the wire here with regards to Neutron BPs in Juno, and I wanted to bring up the topic of the flavor framework BP. This is a critical BP for things like LBaaS, FWaaS, etc. We need this work

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS Mid Cycle Sprint

We are now on: #openstack-lbaas The #neutron-lbaas is now deprecated. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Dustin Lundquist dus...@null-ptr.net wrote: Actually the channel name is #neutron-lbaas. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: Also, pop into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API

What was discussed at yesterday's Neutron core meeting? On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: Any core neutron people have a chance to give their opinions on this yet? Thanks, Brandon On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 15:28 +, Buraschi, Andres wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS operator scale service --- Next steps and goals.

We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below. Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if you disagree :-) For simplicity in the rest of the email and so I can differentiate between all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS operator scale service --- Next steps and goals.

*From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:36 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Cc:* Cuddy, Tim; Balle, Susanne; vbhamidip...@paypal.com *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS operator scale

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS operator scale service --- Next steps and goals.

We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below. Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if you disagree :-) For simplicity in the rest of the email and so I can differentiate between all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

Great summit!! fantastic to meeting you all in person. We now have agreement on the Object model. How do we turn that into blueprints and also how do we start making progress on the rest of the items we agree upon at the summit? Susanne On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Brandon Logan

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][FWaaS][VPNaaS] Minutes from meeting around Advanced Services (particularly LBaaS) and Neutron

All, Thank you for attending the meeting around the Advanced Services and Neutron yesterday in the Neutron pod. We had a great meeting. The goal of this session was to discuss how the current Neutron LBaaS doesn't fit the need of what is now defined as operators e.g. large scale (private,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][FWaaS][VPNaaS] Advanced Services (particularly LBaaS) and Neutron

susanne.ba...@hp.comwrote: Reminder that we plan to meet tomorrow Tuesday May 13 at 2pm at the Neutron pod on level 3. Susanne Sent from my iPhone On May 7, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.commailto: sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Advanced Services/LBaaS Stackers, We

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][FWaaS][VPNaaS] Advanced Services (particularly LBaaS) and Neutron

Hi Advanced Services/LBaaS Stackers, We are setting up a meeting to discuss if it makes sense to separate the advanced services (LBaaS, FW, VPNaaS) from Neutron into separate projects. We want a healthy discussion around the pros and cons of separating the advanced services from Neutron and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][FWaaS][VPNaaS] Advanced Services (particularly LBaaS) and Neutron

://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AdvancedServices_and_Neutron a note recalling two technical challenges that do not exists when LBaaS runs as a Neutron extension. -Sam. *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 07, 2014 2:45 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit Sessions

Kyle Will the Neutron pod location be a known place to attendees? Will there be signs, etc? Thanks Susanne On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote: On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Tina TSOU tina.tsou.zout...@huawei.com wrote: Dear Kyle, Thanks for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Juno-Summit] availability of the project project pod rooms on Monday May 12th?

Thierry How do I reserve a pod for a specific time and day. I am getting ready to setup a meeting. Susanne On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Carl Baldwin wrote: Is there a map, a list, or some other official reference? I may like to use a pod for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] HA functionality discussion

I agree that the HA should be hidden to the user/tenant. IMHO a tenant should just use a load-balancer as a “managed” black box where the service is resilient in itself. Our current Libra/LBaaS implementation in the HP public cloud uses a pool of standby LB to replace failing tenant’s LB. Our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data from Operators needed.

to prioritize requirements based on the operator data that gets provided. We can move it over to the other page if you think that makes sense. See everyone on the weekly meeting tomorrow! Cheers, --Jorge *From: *Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com *Reply-To: *OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well. Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me directions on how to test it and contribute to the project. Susanne On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta henriquecostatr...@gmail.com wrote: @Oleg, @Sylvain,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data from Operators needed.

I added two more. I am still working on our HA use cases. Susanne On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: I added our priorities. I hope its formatted well enough. I just took a stab in the dark. Thanks, Kevin -- *From:* Eugene

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

Geoff I noticed the following two blueprints: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/adv-services-in-vms This blueprint defines a framework for creating, managing and deploying Neutron advanced services implemented as virtual machines. The goal is to enable advanced network services

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

is what allows this. The challenging aspect is ensuring different drivers support the API contract in the same way. What components should drivers share is also and interesting conversation to be had. Cheers, --Jorge From: Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

it because hopefully most cloud operators will use the same driver that addresses those basic needs, but worst case scenarios we have a ton of drivers that do a lot of similar things but are just different enough to warrant a separate driver. -- *From:* Susanne Balle

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: That for sure can be implemented. I only would recommend to implement such kind of management system out of Neutron/LBaaS tree, e.g. to only have client within Libra driver that will communicate with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi John, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey j...@dewey.ws wrote: I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Glossary

Looks good, Thanks Susanne On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi, Here's the wiki page with a list of terms we're usually operate when discussing lbaas object model: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Glossary Feel free to

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services concept

the db, etc. and have a new LB running. Regards Susanne -- Susanne Balle HP Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

My apologies if you receive this twice. I seems to have problems with my gmail account. Hi Neutron LBaaS folks, I have been getting up to speed on the Neutron LBaaS implementation and have been wondering how to make it fit our needs in HP public cloud as well as as an enterprise-grade load

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and managed services

Eugene, Thanks for your comments, See inline: Susanne On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Susanne, a couple of comments inline: We would like to discuss adding the concept of managed services to the Neutron LBaaS either directly or via

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

+1. Count me in. Susanne On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: +1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in Atlanta would be great. - Stephen On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: I

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards

What I'd like to find out now: 1) who's interested in this topic? Please include me. 2) who's interested in helping flesh out the guidelines for various log levels? Please include me. 3) who's interested in helping get these kinds of patches into various projects in OpenStack? 4) which