Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Erno Kuvaja wrote: > [...] > So this raises a question: If it is integral part of Glare becoming > part of big tent, does it mean that we as OpenStack Community > fundamentally agree on that goal? because in that case I would be way > less supportive. [...] Approving Glare as an official

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/13/2017 08:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor >> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 14:20

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/12/2017 02:02 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 19:21 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/13/2017 08:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> >> On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor >>> wrote: >>> On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 11/07/17 19:21 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Third, all these changes can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Third, all these changes can be hidden in Glare client. So if we try a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

++ As I was not sure how to word it without sounding too opinionated without appropriate technical jargon. When most folks hear "mostly the same" regarding a critical component, and sometimes not so critical ones, that raises all kinds of red flags. I could not think from purely code aspect of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Third, all these changes can be hidden in Glare client. So if we try a little, we can achieve 100% compatibility there,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> For example, deactivating an image in Glance looks like *POST* >> /v2/images/{image_id}/actions/deactivate with empty body. >> At one time, Chris Dent advised us to avoid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: For example, deactivating an image in Glance looks like *POST* /v2/images/{image_id}/actions/deactivate with empty body. At one time, Chris Dent advised us to avoid such decisions, and simply change the status of the artifact to 'deactivated' using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> Thank you for asking this! It's really very important and interesting, so >> I'm going to explain those things more detailed. >> >> First, when we designed Glare, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin mfedo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > >> On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> >>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >> > wrote: >>> >>> Given all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Monty Taylor wrote: However, as you said, conceptually the calls are very similar so making an API controller that can be registered in the catalog as "image" should be fairly easy to do, no? In general I think we should always keep this strategy in mind when we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Thank you for asking this! It's really very important and interesting, so I'm going to explain those things more detailed. First, when we designed Glare, we kept in mind the compatibility with Glance, and I can tell that Glance data from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > wrote: Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can become the successful drop-in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Thank you for asking this! It's really very important and interesting, so I'm going to explain those things more detailed. First, when we designed Glare, we kept in mind the compatibility with Glance, and I can tell that Glance data from the database can be ported to Glare with a simple script

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > wrote: Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can become the successful drop-in replacement. Can you clarify this? Let’s assume I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > wrote: Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can become the successful drop-in replacement. Can you clarify this? Let’s assume I have a decent-sized

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Given all the advantages and features of Glare, I believe that it can become > the successful drop-in replacement. Can you clarify this? Let’s assume I have a decent-sized deployment running Glance. If I were to remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Hello Mike :) WRT the PTG, if you get approved as an official project before the end of the month, we would love to have you! The PTG isn't formatted the same as the Forum though. The PTG is more project focused technical discussions amongst project contributors- think midcycle rather than

[openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Hello! Recently I applied for inclusion of Glare in the list of official OpenStack projects: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479285/ In this regard, I would like to ask the community what other things can be improved in the project to meet all the necessary requirements. Also in this thread I