Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-12-03 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi, Sure they must have the same provider. Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways: - implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes provider for the instance. - explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance. In that case provider attribute will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-12-02 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi Eugene, Iwamoto You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons. I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have different providers or not. (I think it should be same.) Thanks Itsuto Ofa On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-12-01 Thread IWAMOTO Toshihiro
At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, Itsuro ODA wrote: Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-28 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Itsuro, I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that illustrate proposed API. Please see the updated page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change Thanks, Eugene. On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-28 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi Eugene, Thank you for the response. I have a comment. I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. What do you think ? I'm looking forward to your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-28 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi, I can't find the 28th meeting log. (Does not logs automatically generated ?) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-28 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi, I found it in /meeting/nuetron_lbaas. (neutron - nuetron) On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:51:56 +0900 Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote: Hi, I can't find the 28th meeting log. (Does not logs automatically generated ?) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-27 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Neutron folks, LBaaS subteam meeting will be on Thursday, 27, at 14-00 UTC as usual. We'll discuss current progress and continue with feature design. Thanks, Eugene. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Thursday subteam meeting

2013-11-27 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi, I'd like to review about LoadblancerInstance API specification. Please update wiki page before the meeting. (It is a little bit hard to follow in the IRC for me since I'm not English native. so I'd like to consider for the API beforehand.) Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:47