On 24 August 2016 at 10:30, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 22 August 2016 at 18:25, Armando M. wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 22 August 2016 at 09:51, Armando M. wrote:
>>
>>> Neutrinos,
>>>
>>> Since the merge of test [1], a race has surfaced, which
Armando M. wrote:
> One more update:
>
> We're not quite out of the woods, yet so approve/recheck gently please.
>
> Things have become slightly better but we still have a pending fix for
> Neutron [1]. Recently we also observed zuul nodes dying unexpectedly on the
> OSIC cloud (that runs
On 22 August 2016 at 18:25, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 22 August 2016 at 09:51, Armando M. wrote:
>
>> Neutrinos,
>>
>> Since the merge of test [1], a race has surfaced, which leads to failure
>> as reported in [2]. A number of Neutron's jobs are affected,
On 22 August 2016 at 09:51, Armando M. wrote:
> Neutrinos,
>
> Since the merge of test [1], a race has surfaced, which leads to failure
> as reported in [2]. A number of Neutron's jobs are affected, and even
> though the failure is only intermittent, it is particularly bad for
Neutrinos,
Since the merge of test [1], a race has surfaced, which leads to failure as
reported in [2]. A number of Neutron's jobs are affected, and even though
the failure is only intermittent, it is particularly bad for the linux
bridge job.
If I can ask you to hold your +2/+W until [3] puts