On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 05:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17,
On 09/01/2016 05:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
However, the current gate system
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> > However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files
>> >
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files affected.
> > So we can also run a scenario covering ironic on THT check/gate if
> >
Hi!
Looks great! Ironic currently requires a few manual steps, I wonder how
we do them, but I guess we can figure out later.
On 08/24/2016 08:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Ok I have PoC ready for review and feedback:
- First iteration of scenario001 job in TripleO CI:
Ok I have PoC ready for review and feedback:
- First iteration of scenario001 job in TripleO CI:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/360039
I checked, and the job is not triggered if we don't touch Sahara files directly.
- Patch in THT that tries to modify Sahara files:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:20 AM, James Slagle wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files affected.
>> So we can also run a scenario covering ironic on THT
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files affected.
> So we can also run a scenario covering ironic on THT check/gate if
> puppet/services/*ironic* is affected, but not in the other cases. This
On 08/17/2016 03:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:49 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi everyone, happy Monday :)
I'd like to start the discussion about CI-testing the optional
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:49 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> Hi everyone, happy Monday :)
>>
>> I'd like to start the discussion about CI-testing the optional composable
>> services in the CI (I'm
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi everyone, happy Monday :)
>
> I'd like to start the discussion about CI-testing the optional composable
> services in the CI (I'm primarily interested in Ironic, but I know there are
> a lot more).
>
> Currently
On 08/15/2016 10:54 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi everyone, happy Monday :)
I'd like to start the discussion about CI-testing the optional
composable services in the CI (I'm primarily interested in Ironic, but I
know there are a lot more).
thanks for bringing this up, with "pluggability" comes
Hi everyone, happy Monday :)
I'd like to start the discussion about CI-testing the optional
composable services in the CI (I'm primarily interested in Ironic, but I
know there are a lot more).
Currently every time we change something in an optional service, we have
to create a DO-NOT-MERGE
14 matches
Mail list logo