On 8/28/13 11:28 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Hi Developers,
Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Hi Developers,
Let me explain my point of view on this topic and
On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Hi Developers,
Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your thoughts
in order to merge this new feature ASAP.
My
:29 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Cc: Robert Kukura; Armando Migliaccio; Nachi Ueno; Sumit Naiksatam
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] About multihost patch review
On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana emag
First 'be like nova-network' is a merit for some deployments.
second, To allow admin to decide which network will be multihosted at
runtime will enable the neutron to continue using the current network node
(dhcp agent) mode at the same time.
If we force the network multihosted when the
On Aug 26, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Hi Developers,
Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your thoughts
in order to merge this new feature ASAP.
My understanding is that multi-host is nova-network HA and we are
implementing
On Aug 26, 2013, at 9:39 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com wrote:
First 'be like nova-network' is a merit for some deployments.
I'm afraid 'merit' is a bit vague for me. Would you please elaborate?
second, To allow admin to decide which network will be multihosted at runtime
On 27/08/13 15:23, Maru Newby wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 9:39 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com wrote:
First 'be like nova-network' is a merit for some deployments.
I'm afraid 'merit' is a bit vague for me. Would you please elaborate?
One area of 'merit' in this area is for
On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 27/08/13 15:23, Maru Newby wrote:
On Aug 26, 2013, at 9:39 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com wrote:
First 'be like nova-network' is a merit for some deployments.
I'm afraid 'merit' is a bit vague for me.
Hi,
Edgar Magana has commented to say:
'This is the part that for me is confusing and I will need some
clarification from the community. Do we expect to have the multi-host
feature as an extension or something that will natural work as long as the
deployment include more than one Network Node. In
Hi Developers,
Let me explain my point of view on this topic and please share your thoughts
in order to merge this new feature ASAP.
My understanding is that multi-host is nova-network HA and we are
implementing this bp
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-multihost for the
11 matches
Mail list logo