On 28/08/13 14:28 -0400, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com
wrote:
What was wrong with qpid, rabbitmq, activemq, zeromq, ${your favorite
queue here} that required marconi?
That's a good question. The features supported by
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
What was wrong with qpid, rabbitmq, activemq, zeromq, ${your favorite
queue here} that required marconi?
That's a good question. The features supported by AMQP brokers, ZMQ, and
Marconi certainly do
On 26/08/13 15:34 -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi Kurt,
There's a thread that John Griffith started about 3rd party storage drivers,
where the code lives, how to review, how to ensure quality and maintenance, see
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/012557.html.
It won't
What was wrong with qpid, rabbitmq, activemq, zeromq, ${your favorite
queue here} that required marconi?
That's a good question. The features supported by AMQP brokers, ZMQ, and
Marconi certainly do overlap in some areas. At the same time, however, each of
these options offer distinct
Thanks, this does help clear up my understanding of how this fits in.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/08/13 16:29 +, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
What was wrong with qpid, rabbitmq, activemq, zeromq, ${your favorite
Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Contributors,
As you may already know, over the last seven months, contributors from a
variety of companies and backgrounds have been designing and developing the
Marconi project, a highly-scalable and redundant messaging service.
Marconi was proposed
