Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-16 Thread Joe Gordon
I am happy to help to but I don't have much extra bandwidth at the moment, so I can only play a supporting role as a core and not a leadership role. On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: I'm happy to help, although I'm pretty busy... Michael On Fri, Jul

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-16 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Monty thanks a lot! By the way there are 2 more guys that have a lot of experience with sqlalchemy-migrate: 1) Roman (rpodolyaka) 2) Viktor (vsergeyev) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I am happy to help to but I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-13 Thread Michael Still
I'm happy to help, although I'm pretty busy... Michael On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Hi Sean, I agree to help with sqlalchemy-migrate until we remove it. But probably there should be one more person mikal Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Fri,

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Monty Taylor wrote: This brings us to the most important question: Who wants to be on the core team? That's the important question indeed. Accepting it (permanently or temporarily) under stackforge is an easy decision. But it's useless unless we have a set of people sufficiently interested in

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-12 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/12/2013 04:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: This brings us to the most important question: Who wants to be on the core team? That's the important question indeed. Accepting it (permanently or temporarily) under stackforge is an easy decision. But it's useless unless we

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-12 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi Sean, I agree to help with sqlalchemy-migrate until we remove it. But probably there should be one more person mikal Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 07/12/2013 04:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: This

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-12 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/12/2013 07:37 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi Sean, I agree to help with sqlalchemy-migrate until we remove it. But probably there should be one more person mikal Done. https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate This is up and active, and it will run unittests. Right now it

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-12 Thread David Ripton
On 07/12/2013 07:31 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/12/2013 04:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: This brings us to the most important question: Who wants to be on the core team? That's the important question indeed. Accepting it (permanently or temporarily) under stackforge is an

[openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Discussing with Jan Dittberner, who is upstream for sqlalchemy-migrate, it appears that he doesn't have time to maintain it. Is the OpenStack project willing to take over? Jan is ok to hand over everything, moving to Github, give access to Pypi, etc. Below is his reply to me when I asked

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread David Ripton
OpenStack is currently divided. Older projects like Nova use sqlalchemy-migrate. Some newer projects like Neutron use alembic. I'd personally like to see everything in Alembic, but migrating all the Nova scripts in a way that didn't break compatibility will be a big challenge. It's easier

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/11/2013 02:40 PM, David Ripton wrote: OpenStack is currently divided. Older projects like Nova use sqlalchemy-migrate. Some newer projects like Neutron use alembic. I'd personally like to see everything in Alembic, but migrating all the Nova scripts in a way that didn't break

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/11/2013 03:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 07/11/2013 02:40 PM, David Ripton wrote: OpenStack is currently divided. Older projects like Nova use sqlalchemy-migrate. Some newer projects like Neutron use alembic. I'd personally like to see everything in Alembic, but migrating all

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/12/2013 07:29 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: We've got the upstream pypi and rtfd credentials now, the project should be moved in to openstack systems soon enough. I also went through and cleaned up build and test stuff work work like our stuff works (if we're going to be maintaining it, we

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-07-12 08:01:58 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] You might as well want to apply Fedora's patch (thanks to Pádraig Brady) for SQLAlchemy 0.8: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-migrate.git/commit/?id=603ed1d1 which was the reason I started the discussion with Jan

Re: [openstack-dev] SQLAlchemy-migrate needs a new maintainer

2013-07-11 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/11/2013 08:01 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 07/12/2013 07:29 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: We've got the upstream pypi and rtfd credentials now, the project should be moved in to openstack systems soon enough. I also went through and cleaned up build and test stuff work work like our stuff