[PATCH] Fix has_better_load evaluation

Fixes two bugs: 1) if condition in is_better_candidate previously always evaluated to false. 2) below_load_threshold actually implemented above_load_threshold Signed-off-by: Daniel Albers --- policy.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c

[usteer] Fix has_better_load evaluation

Fixes two bugs: 1) if condition in is_better_candidate previously always evaluated to false. 2) below_load_threshold actually implemented above_load_threshold Fixes #5 --- policy.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c index

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

Hi, > Le 8 mai 2024 à 09:30, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit : > > Hi, > >> [...] >> Let me explain why: >> Currently the snapshot builders are only building **target-specific** >> packages as well as packages included in the image by default. (We call >> that "phase1"). That means that a single build

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

Hi, [...] Let me explain why: Currently the snapshot builders are only building **target-specific** packages as well as packages included in the image by default. (We call that "phase1"). That means that a single build takes around 2~3 hours, depending on the target and the machine carrying out

Re: Install LuCI for snapshots builds

On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 03:32, Rich Brown wrote: > > Daniel, > > I find your comment persuasive. I was not aware of the cost of including LuCI > In the nightly builds. I withdraw my "+1" for including LuCI. > > On May 7, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > > ...That means that a single build