On 10/08/23 22:36, Thibaut wrote:
Le 10 août 2023 à 22:25, Philip Prindeville
a écrit :
On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB NVMe
stick that
On 2023-08-10 22:36, Thibaut wrote:
Le 10 août 2023 à 22:25, Philip Prindeville
a écrit :
On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB NVMe
stick that
> Le 10 août 2023 à 22:25, Philip Prindeville
> a écrit :
>
>
>
>> On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB
>>> NVMe stick that would make a
> On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB
>> NVMe stick that would make a decent file server/NAS...
>>> On Aug 6, 2023, at 11:46 AM, Paul D wrote:
On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB NVMe
stick that would make a decent file server/NAS...
On Aug 6, 2023, at 11:46 AM, Paul D wrote:
Pretty sure not. I'm receptive to ZFS and have used it in a few
> On Aug 8, 2023, at 3:14 PM, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Alberto. I'm wondering how much work making it cross-build packages
>> is going to be...
>>
>> Digging into it now...
>>
>
> You should take a look at ksmbd package. It does compile an out-of-tree
> module.
>
> Thanks, Alberto. I'm wondering how much work making it cross-build packages
> is going to be...
>
> Digging into it now...
>
You should take a look at ksmbd package. It does compile an out-of-tree module.
Maintaining a package like that might be challenging for a stable
version. The kernel
Thanks, Alberto. I'm wondering how much work making it cross-build packages is
going to be...
Digging into it now...
> On Aug 7, 2023, at 3:23 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
> ZFS would be useful for any device with a few GB of RAM that has data drives
> (a NAS for example). I've used ZFS
ZFS would be useful for any device with a few GB of RAM that has data
drives (a NAS for example). I've used ZFS extensively on x86 systems
with other Linux distros (Debian/Proxmox and OpenSUSE).
I think ZFS support is a good thing.
Booting from ZFS is probably not necessary for OpenWrt but zfs
I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB NVMe
stick that would make a decent file server/NAS...
> On Aug 6, 2023, at 11:46 AM, Paul D wrote:
>
> Pretty sure not. I'm receptive to ZFS and have used it in a few projects.
> Openwrt tends to focus on (devices
Pretty sure not. I'm receptive to ZFS and have used it in a few
projects. Openwrt tends to focus on (devices with) smaller flash drives.
Other FS better suited to such env.
No ZFS is in available software packages today, in any case.
On 2023-08-06 00:53, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Has
Has anyone tried to package ZFS (more correctly, OpenZFS) for OpenWRT? Is
there any interest in doing so?
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
12 matches
Mail list logo