On Wed, 22 May 2013, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On the other hand, not needing to interoperate with Google Talk might
free us to more aggressively work on network security improvements. I
say let's take this as an opportunity rather than a disappointment.
+1. I wonder what the correlation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On May 22, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On the other hand, not needing to interoperate with Google Talk might
free us to more aggressively work on network security improvements. I
say let's take this as an opportunity rather than
On 2013-05-22 18:22, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
PS: I am wondering whether the claimed chat spam problems mentioned in the
press articles are actually true?
It matches what was said before, search this list for spammy invites.
--
Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/22/13 10:32 AM, Kim Alvefur wrote:
On 2013-05-22 18:22, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
PS: I am wondering whether the claimed chat spam problems
mentioned in the press articles are actually true?
It matches what was said before, search this list
On 22 May 2013 16:02, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On the other hand, not needing to interoperate with Google Talk might
free us to more aggressively work on network security improvements. I
say let's take this as an opportunity rather than a disappointment.
Agreed. We're
I dont think it matters if they were true or not- Google and every other walled
garden uses spam as an excuse, and a poor excuse at that. Anybody can cut down
on spam by reducing access- real programmers/engineers/admins accept the
challenge of providing quality, open systems. This whole move
On 05/22/2013 04:47 PM, michael p wrote:
I dont think it matters if they were true or not- Google and every other walled
garden uses spam as an excuse, and a poor excuse at that. Anybody can cut down
on spam by reducing access- real programmers/engineers/admins accept the
challenge of
22 maj 2013 kl. 18:40 skrev Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im:
In any case, I say let's continue to focus on improving XMPP. When
people get sick of all these silos again, as I expect they will, we'll
be ready.
In the Stockholm Internet Forum today, it was highlighted that almost
all
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kim Alvefur z...@zash.se wrote:
On 2013-05-22 18:22, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
PS: I am wondering whether the claimed chat spam problems mentioned in
the press articles are actually true?
It matches what was said before, search this list for spammy invites.
On 2013-05-22 19:54, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kim Alvefur z...@zash.se wrote:
On 2013-05-22 18:22, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
PS: I am wondering whether the claimed chat spam problems mentioned in
the press articles are actually true?
It matches what was said
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/22/13 12:27 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
I think it was a bit over-the-top for Chee Chew to claim that
the majority of the server-to-server connectivity to the Google
Talk service was established
Am 22.05.2013 20:30, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't
understood the x part in xmpp.
Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-)
We had an on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP predated Google Talk and now we
start the
On 5/22/13 1:09 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
Am 22.05.2013 20:30, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't
understood the x part in xmpp.
Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-)
We had an on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP
Information is to be updated as follows:
domain: [lightwitch.org]
website: [http://www.lightwitch.org/im-service]
year launched: [2009]
country: [USA]
latitude: [40.73]
longitude: [-74.17]
CA: [StartSSL]
server software: [Metronome]
admin name: [Marco Cirillo]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/22/13 2:58 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote:
Information is to be updated as follows:
domain: [lightwitch.org] website:
[http://www.lightwitch.org/im-service] year launched: [2009]
country: [USA] latitude: [40.73] longitude: [-74.17] CA:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin, thanks for weighing in.
On 5/22/13 5:35 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
stpe...@stpeter.im mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 5/22/13
16 matches
Mail list logo
