Re: [Operators] vcard for jabber.tcpreset.net

). Peter On 4/4/19 10:47 AM, Seve Ferrer wrote: > Hi Peter, > > What is that list you mention? Would like to see if I'm able to help there. > > Seve. > > On 4 April 2019 18:36:04 CEST, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > On 4/4/19 3:49 AM, G1 wrote: > >

Re: [Operators] GDPR options for server operators

On 5/21/18 4:29 PM, Nikola Kolev wrote: > Hi, > > In the light of the coming GDPR, I'm trying to assess what is the > amount of work required in order for the service I'm providing to be in > compliance with the requirements imposed. Is there any useful data as a > result from all of the

Re: [Operators] GDPR & XSF 13 - Minutes

On 5/17/18 5:30 PM, Maxime Buquet wrote: > [1]: https://monal.im/blog/gdpr-removing-monal-from-the-eu/ "As GDPR approaches, I get the impression that it is an end of an era for the internet." This is my feeling as well. :( Peter signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Operators] GDPR & XSF 3 - Minutes

Also, someone from the Debian community has set up a discussion list here: https://www.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/gdpr-discuss Peter On 4/9/18 11:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Of interest: > > https://blog.mozilla.org/berlin/en/countdown-to-gdpr/ > > And if you're Berlin,

Re: [Operators] GDPR & XSF 3 - Minutes

Of interest: https://blog.mozilla.org/berlin/en/countdown-to-gdpr/ And if you're Berlin, join in person! :-) On 4/9/18 6:03 AM, David Banes wrote: > Re: Ge0rG > I think there is still no clear consensus whether IP addresses > are PII or not > > Yes IP addresses will be PII under GDPR,

Re: [Operators] Defunct XMPP servers

On 2/4/18 11:38 AM, Daniel Wachter wrote: > Good day, > > swissjabber.li has been defunct for weeks. It worked briefly two weeks > ago, in order to return to 'no connection' soon. Can we report this > somewhere so that it is removed from https://xmpp.net/directory.php . Done. Is this just

Re: [Operators] List of spam servers for ejabberd - new YAML format

On 9/2/17 10:12 AM, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:27:35 -0400 > Solomon Peachy wrote: > >> This crap can and will drive users away from federated XMPP >> altogether, and is a far bigger practical problem than non-encrypted >> S2S comms. > > Finally someone

Re: [Operators] Jid spammer list

On 2/18/17 1:43 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 08:07:09PM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: And IMO, this still-getting-worse spam problem is far more of a threat to the XMPP network than Google's lack of encrypted S2S support. I've started blocking entire domains now, as they're

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC @ .IM TLD

for instant messaging services (especially those based on the standard XMPP protocol developed at the Internet Engineering Task Force), and we would love to use DNSSEC for improved security of these servies. Best Regards, Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ ### On 2/1/16 8:06 AM, Thomas

[Operators] addressing the spam problem

Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for mitigating (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0268.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0275.html I suggest that we work on this problem

Re: [Operators] Annoying spam

On 11/10/15 8:30 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: Sam Whited writes: This doesn't answer the question directly, but I've been keeping a list of JIDs that I've seen sending spam: https://bitbucket.org/snippets/SamWhited/rLqKB/spammy-jids Feel free to add to it (I think you can

Re: [Operators] debian.org XMPP - using DANE / TLSA?

On 10/28/15 3:32 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: We are just reviewing the final configuration before announcing debian.org XMPP Can anybody comment on DANE / TLSA? Should we only talk to servers supporting this? Why wouldn't you talk to servers that use PKI certificates as long as you can

Re: [Operators] xmpp.net outage

On 10/8/15 7:02 AM, Vincent Lauton wrote: Was wondering what was going on. Sorry about the delay in posting - I was offline when this started and then traveling. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] xmpp.net outage

On 10/8/15 7:34 AM, Edwin Mons wrote: On 08/10/15 16:15, Peter Saint-Andre - wrote: On 10/8/15 7:02 AM, Mike Barnes wrote: I was looking at the possibility of setting up a functional equivalent to it in a couple of weeks anyway, but using the actual code would make that trivial. I'd be really

Re: [Operators] Annoying spam

email to hostmaster@, postmaster@, webmaster@, and xmpp@ those domains (sometimes you can look up an admin address in whois, too). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] Annoying spam

NOT maintained servers and post them on my homepage wth the reason why they were blocked. I hope some of the admins of ozerki.net, bin.vc, jabber.ru are in this list and see this. -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] Annoying spam

On 9/9/15 8:23 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - wrote: It might be time to revisit the old spam-prevention specs we started to define years ago. For the record, those were things like: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0267.html http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep

Re: [Operators] Ejabberd upgrades and mnesia multinode setup

Modded Sent from mobile, might be terse On Aug 5, 2015, at 5:25 PM, Mr. Glen J. Loftin glenlof...@loftintechnologies.com wrote: What do you all know about x-ass Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Mickaël Rémond mrem...@process-one.net wrote: Hello Holger, Holger

Re: [Operators] buycc.me spam domain

and ejabberdctl debug, mnesia:clear_table(s2s), ctrl-c, ctrl-c. Have a nice day. pinky 2015-05-13 15:08 GMT+02:00 Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net mailto:pe...@andyet.net: As far as I can determine, buycc.me http://buycc.me

[Operators] process changes for xmpp.net

to that repo so that I'm less of a blocker.) I'll also update the instructions at https://xmpp.net/register.php very soon. Thanks for your patience. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] process changes for xmpp.net

On 4/16/15 12:55 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: On 16 apr. 2015, at 17:48, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote: OK folks, I have finally gotten organized about xmpp.net! Yesterday Thijs modified the code so that the server list for https://xmpp.net/directory.php pulls automatically

Re: [Operators] R: Spamming/Bots on XMPP

On 2/9/15 2:59 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote: With an educated guess, I suppose your problem's name is called IBR. At jabber.org, we have lots of spambot registrations even once we turned off in-band registration. Turning off registration entirely solved that problem. ;-) Peter

Re: [Operators] Hey all,

, mailto:operators-requ...@xmpp.org?subject=unsubscribe I already unsubscribed that person. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] Is the Public Server Directory still maintained?

to the github repo? https://github.com/stpeter/xmppdotnet Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

[Operators] administrivia

BTW, I am modding anyone who posts off-topic messages to this list. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] SSLv3 is out.

to prevent these insecure clients from connecting than let them continue thinking everything is ok. +1 That's consistent with the UTA work: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-xmpp/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp/ Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/

Re: [Operators] removal of 0nl1ne.at

Hi Nik, You're right that the comment wasn't helpful - I used the same comment for every server that scored F. I'll reply more later - just running out the door here. Peter On 8/24/14, 8:32 AM, Nikolaus Polak wrote: Hello, I've no problem with the removal of 0nl1ne.at from the xmpp.net

Re: [Operators] Google status?

On 8/13/14, 1:30 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: A cynical person could also make a counter-strike: display some warning popup in the regular XMPP clients each time somebody tries to start a new chat with a user @gmail.com and doesn't receive a response in 2 minutes. Warning: the person you have

Re: [Operators] May 19th - Permanent encrypted XMPP network and Open Discussion Day

On 5/20/14, 1:12 AM, Robert Norris wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014, at 06:13 AM, Ludovic BOCQUET wrote: Do not forget to force encryption for S2S and C2S for have all encrypted connections, after this the XMPP network will be more secure. Somewhat late to the party but FastMail now has working

Re: [Operators] header intact

On 4/10/14, 2:35 AM, Edwin Mons wrote: On 10/04/14 11:18, kalei meyers wrote: Body gone ;-) Sender modded. :-)

[Operators] Fwd: [Security] Security Notice: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption with Highly-Compressed XMPP Stanzas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FYI. - Original Message Subject: [Security] Security Notice: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption with Highly-Compressed XMPP Stanzas Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:27:34 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im Reply-To: XMPP

Re: [Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

to be admins in these rooms and now need to be given admin rights, etc.). But, of course, I might be mistaken. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

On 2/7/14, 7:59 AM, Eric Koldeweij wrote: Please note that the status of that document is deferred and it is recommended to not implement this I'm happy to bring it back to life. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

NOT IMPLEMENT” warning someday, it is only confusing and is often the exact opposite of what should be done (i.e. work on implementing it and see what can be improved). Good point! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

for a little while. Now we have dedicated accounts set up that just create 100+ MUCs and then other accounts with similar usernames on other servers also get admin rights (we block those as well, btw). It sees best to lock down MUC creation so that only server admins can do it. Peter -- Peter Saint

Re: [Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

On 2/7/14, 2:13 PM, Mathias Ertl wrote: On 02/07/2014 06:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 2/7/14, 9:52 AM, Mathias Ertl wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Marco Cirillo wrote: Given the insistence... I just ended restricting room creation on conference.lightwitch.org

[Operators] DDoS attacks against jabber.org

Folks, The jabber.org IM service has experienced an ongoing DDoS attack over the last several days. The attack occurs over XMPP (not TCP) and has originated from JabberIDs registered with a broad cross-section of servers on the public XMPP network. As far as we have been able to determine,

Re: [Operators] Prosody vs. spammers - security measures?

about my practice? Hey guys, chill out. We're trying to solve a problem we have in common, not fight amongst ourselves. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Operators] Prosody vs. spammers - security measures?

really do need to figure out how to solve the problem of fake users. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/

Re: [Operators] Prosody vs. spammers - security measures?

On 2/3/14, 10:39 AM, David Banes wrote: On 3 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: On 2/3/14, 9:50 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Feb 03, Thomas Camaran cama...@gmail.com wrote: i have over 30k users with prodosy in more one domain but not have this problem Good

Re: [Operators] Prosody vs. spammers - security measures?

On 2/3/14, 10:54 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Feb 03, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: Good for you. Last year I had to close registrations to jabber.linux.it because there were more fake than real users. We really do need to figure out how to solve the problem of fake users. I

Re: [Operators] Prosody vs. spammers - security measures?

On 2/3/14, 11:03 AM, Marco Cirillo wrote: Il 03/02/2014 18:50, Peter Saint-Andre ha scritto: Truly I don't know what would really help. :( Peter Registration form with a long complex captcha + DEA filter + ip address based throttling, E-Mail verification + 1 Mail Address associated per XMPP

Re: [Operators] Removing SSLv3 from ejabberd 2.1.x and 13.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/06/2014 06:31 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: Also note that SSLv3 hasn't been shown to be any less secure than TLSv1 (in fact they are essentially the same), but TLSv1 is still very widely used. Therefore there is no security reason to disable

Re: [Operators] Security Test Day - feedback needed!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/05/2014 01:23 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On my personal server, I too plan to keep the encryption-required setting

Re: [Operators] Security Test Day - feedback needed!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/05/2014 03:41 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote: Il 05/01/2014 20:13, Mike Taylor ha scritto: So a lot of us flipped the encryption required flag for our Server-to-Server connections yesterday, how did it go? For my self it went very well, but I also

Re: [Operators] The Google issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/02/2014 04:50 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: Peter Saint-Andre: On 12/6/13 7:46 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:59:40AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Ideally, Google would decide to either shut off federation

Re: [Operators] The Google issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/6/13 7:46 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:59:40AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Ideally, Google would decide to either shut off federation with the XMPP network entirely or at least support unauthenticated TLS

Re: [Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

TCP is absolutely necessary these days. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

, let's please do it on the standa...@xmpp.org list: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: [Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

authenticated encryption, so I still think that POSH is useful in the short to medium term and DANE/DNSSEC is useful in the long term. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment

Re: [Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/3/13 10:49 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 03.12.2013 15:11, schrieb Matthew Wild: On 3 December 2013 08:11, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote: Am 02.12.2013 18:50, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: On 12/1/13 4:34 AM, Andreas Kuckartz

Re: [Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

% accurate. ;-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnMhVAAoJEOoGpJErxa2p1C4QAJY7gNr4

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

DNSSEC. Now I can add InterNetX to the list of providers I need to research. I'll pursue this more seriously for jabber.org here in the near future. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

- -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSjNP7AAoJEOoGpJErxa2p/m4P/3V1QR7af06IqCFiaSAJ4k/v

[Operators] DNSSEC

jabber.org signed. :) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSi4/HAAoJEOoGpJErxa2peMIP

Re: [Operators] DNSSEC

don't have a release date. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSi6fAAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pbEIP

Re: [Operators] Google post on Cipher selection

- -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJShmuwAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pJkQQAKtOQ78ceVBzFLtDC/8ZnJhC

Re: [Operators] About the IM Observatory and the old xml files

/ Do you plan to bring back the xml list? Would it be possible to have it with the full format (including description, homepage, coordinates...)? We're working on that part of it. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19

Re: [Operators] IM Observatory: Not recognising DigiCert root certificate

at your server. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJScngHAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pFIoP+wT8/QcJhShCaE

Re: [Operators] IM Observatory: Not recognising DigiCert root certificate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/31/2013 05:15 PM, Robert Norris wrote: [potentially taking us off-topic for this list, let me know] Not off-topic at all. On Fri, Nov 1, 2013, at 02:32 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: If I understand your scenario correctly, I think

Re: [Operators] IM Observatory @ xmpp.net

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2013 03:50 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: On 2013-10-30 at 10:22 +0100, Thijs Alkemade wrote: In my opinion, “trusted” should not mean “can xmpp.net make a connection it trusts” but rather “can (most) end users make a connection without

Re: [Operators] IM Observatory: Not recognising DigiCert root certificate

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Norris! I was thinking about you just the other day while walking around the streets of Portland, Oregon. :-) On 10/30/2013 07:44 PM, Robert Norris wrote: Just learned about the IM Observatory, cute idea. Of course I ran our server through it:

Re: [Operators] Fwd: [jdev] TLS Everywhere

secrecy (I don't call it perfect) isn't tied to elliptic curves. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] Fwd: [jdev] TLS Everywhere

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/13 12:46 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote: On 10/29/2013 12:59 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Re: [Operators] Message delivery

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/13 3:10 PM, Peter Kieser wrote: On 2013-10-28 2:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/13 2:54 PM, Peter Kieser wrote: What servers currently support this? ejabbered doesn't: https

[Operators] IM Observatory @ xmpp.net

) for all his work on this new service. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] Re-escalating update for the jappix.com xmpp public service entry.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/10/13 11:24 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: Am 11.09.2013 05:56, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: [2] openssl s_client -connect jappix.com:5222 -starttls xmpp -CAfile gandi.crt try -CApath /etc/ssl/certs instead Ah, thanks for the tip! That solved

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [lsd-25.ru]

us know when you've had a chance to fix that. Thanks! Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: suchat.org

. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSL94ZAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pSWAQAIf9WfXBSSD8xL96IY5IZDdV

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [jabberafrica.org]

longitude: 18.423889 CA: RapidSSL server software: Prosody admin name: Gunter Grodotzki admin JID: freaka...@jabberafrica.org description: free public XMPP server based in Cape Town, South Africa. Verified and added. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [jabberpl.org]

:) Verified and added. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSL+NuAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pPbAP

Re: [Operators] Please add my public XMPP service

website for this once I have time to do so) year launched: 2013 country: DE CA: StartSSL server software: Openfire admin name: Moonchild admin JID: moonch...@palemoon.net description: Jabber service offered by the Pale Moon browser project Verified and added. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [ch3kr.net]

] longitude: [50.81] CA: [StartSSL] server software: [ejabberd] admin name: [Torsten Reichard] admin JID: [t...@ch3kr.net] description: [Free Public Jabber Service] Verified and added. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service [patts.us]

to verify that the domain controller approves of this request. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

[Operators] Fwd: [xmpp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-xmpp-tls-00.txt

:35:08 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im To: XMPP x...@ietf.org FYI. - Original Message Subject: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-xmpp-tls-00.txt Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:32:08 -0700 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: i-d-annou

Re: [Operators] Re-escalating update for the jappix.com xmpp public service entry.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks. I'll try to complete a batch of updates tonight or tomorrow night. On 8/28/13 11:43 AM, Marco Cirillo wrote: Authorized to do it on behalf of the owner, The entry should be updated as follows: domain: [jappix.com] website:

Re: [Operators] [Members] [prosody-users] Re: [buddycloud-dev] Some thoughts on buddycloud security / enforcing SSL server to server in Prosody

Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSF5ooAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pgXgP/3soiRZBxOR/lntBUuYGlbn3

Re: [Operators] Some thoughts on xmpp security

. :-) Whether this needs to be an official XSF activity is another topic. I suggest the memb...@xmpp.org list is a good place to raise that issue. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http

Re: [Operators] Some thoughts on xmpp security

at all -- convincing the developers of your favorite IM client to support OTR (in all likelihood) is also important. But, this is the operators@xmpp.org list and I think that operators of XMPP service also need to clean up their act with regard to security. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [jabberpl.org]

(among others that have been verified) will be added with the next batch. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [miqote.com]

] * *longitude*: [9] * *CA*: [RapidSSL] * *server software*: [Prosody] * *admin name*: [Yonnji] * *admin JID*: [yon...@miqote.com] * *description*: [miqo'te jabber service] Verified and added. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: ultracoder.ru

...@ultracoder.ru description: Vsevolozhsk, Leningrad Region, Russia, conferences, ICQ-transport, etc. The operator of this server contacted me offlist and asked that it not be added to the list. Therefore this request will not be acted upon. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: voxnoctem.com

(unable to verify the first certificate) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: im.it-native.de

(unable to verify the first certificate) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [jabberafrica.org]

run at xmpp.net (I keep hoping to find time to code that up for Prosody). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: [Operators] Removal request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Done. On 5/25/13 6:58 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Will do. Sorry about the delay. Sent from mobile, might be terse On May 25, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Peter Schwindt operat...@schwindt-net.de wrote: I asked this before (1st of March

Re: [Operators] Update lightwitch.org public service data

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/4/13 9:10 AM, Marco Cirillo wrote: Il 22/05/2013 23:00, Peter Saint-Andre ha scritto: On 5/22/13 2:58 PM, Marco Cirillo wrote: Information is to be updated as follows: domain: [lightwitch.org] website: [http://www.lightwitch.org/im

Re: [Operators] public XMPP service: [xmpp.ru.net]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Given that ru.net is the entry in WHOIS and xmpp.ru.net is a third-level domain, it is unlikely that we'll be able to verify this server, but I'll send the usual verification request anyway... On 6/5/13 7:35 AM, Support wrote: Please add my public

Re: [Operators] Removal request

Will do. Sorry about the delay. Sent from mobile, might be terse On May 25, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Peter Schwindt operat...@schwindt-net.de wrote: I asked this before (1st of March), but it looks like it was just one mail inbetween hundreds ;-) R: I guess this goes out to stpeter: Please

Re: [Operators] spam resistance

of the entire network, and moreover, it was also an attractive target for spammers, so we'll have a lot of the pressure reduced. Right, so let's get to work. :-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools

Re: [Operators] Spam Registrations

is sending lots of invites or messages in a seemingly automated way, etc. We have a lot of work to do... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: [Operators] Spam Registrations

Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnjSpAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pzLkQAJyPzsrekmHKGUQKcfjM6iug

Re: [Operators] Spam Registrations

came up putting all the pieces I've seen on mailinglists these days together. There is no fundamental human right to an IM account at an open XMPP server. :-) So if there are hurdles to jump through for the typical user, I would not be deeply troubled. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https

Re: [Operators] spam resistance

for granted in email (perhaps because people think it's always been that way, even though it wasn't always that way), whereas it's a tough sell for anything else (IM, voice, video, social networking, etc.). I still don't quite understand why... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im

Re: [Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

case, I say let's continue to focus on improving XMPP. When people get sick of all these silos again, as I expect they will, we'll be ready. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http

Re: [Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/22/13 12:27 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: Am 22.05.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: I think it was a bit over-the-top for Chee Chew to claim that the majority of the server-to-server connectivity to the Google Talk service was established

Re: [Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

On 5/22/13 1:09 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: Am 22.05.2013 20:30, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't understood the x part in xmpp. Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-) We had an on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP

Re: [Operators] Update lightwitch.org public service data

] server software: [Metronome] admin name: [Marco Cirillo] admin JID: [mara...@lightwitch.org] description: [LW.Org IM public service.] Thanks. I'll do some updates to the website this weekend... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [Operators] spam resistance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin, thanks for weighing in. On 5/22/13 5:35 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/22/13 2

Re: [Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

. Seems to fit the pattern of them shutting down interconnecting services. Agreed. Maybe don't be evil has been changed to don't be open. ;-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http

  1   2   3   >