[OPSAWG] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-03

2024-01-12 Thread Joseph Touch via Datatracker
Reviewer: Joseph Touch Review result: Ready with Issues This review is performed as part of the INTAREA cross-area review. There do not appear to be any INTAREA issues in this document. NOTE: as author of the UDP options on which this document is based, I have some other concerns noted below,

Re: [OPSAWG] New I-D -> Guidelines for Charactering "OAM"

2024-01-12 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Greg, Thanks for your thoughtful inspection of our draft. Carlos and I wanted to be sure that all of the discussions of this draft were indexed on one list, and we wanted to avoid multiple copies going to people who are subscribed to multiple lists. So we asked that follow-ups went

Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754)

2024-01-12 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Rebecca, authors, OPSAWG, I think that this errata is valid for both 5.1 and 6.1. I also noted a similar bug for 5.3 for the user_msg_len field. I’ve updated the errata report to also cover this. My intent is verify this errata. Authors, OPSAWG, please let me know if you have any opinion

[OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC8886 (6298)

2024-01-12 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8886, "Secure Device Install". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6298 -- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by:

[OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC8886 (6300)

2024-01-12 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8886, "Secure Device Install". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6300 -- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: